Background and study aim: Polyp miss rates during colonoscopy have been calculated in a few tandem or back-to-back colonoscopy studies. Our objective was to assess the adenoma miss rate while limiting technique or operator expertise biases, i. e. by performing a large multicenter study, with same-day back-to-back video colonoscopy, done by two different operators in randomized order and blinded to the other examination.
Patients and methods: 294 patients at 11 centers were included. Among the 286 analyzable tandem colonoscopies, miss rates were calculated in both a lesion- and patient-based analysis. Each of these rates was determined for polyps overall, for adenomas, and then for lesions larger than 5 mm, and for advanced adenomas. Univariate and logistic regression analysis were performed to define independent variables associated with missed polyps or adenomas.
Results: The miss rates for polyps, adenomas, polyps ≥ 5 mm, adenomas ≥ 5 mm, and advanced adenomas were, respectively, 28 %, 20 %, 12 %, 9 % and 11 %. None of the masses with a carcinomatous (n = 3) or carcinoid component (n = 1) was missed. The specific lesion miss rates for patients with polyps and adenomas were respectively 36 % and 26 % but the corresponding rates were 23 % and 9.4 % when calculated for all 286 patients. The diameter (1-mm increments) and number of polyps (≥ 3) were independently associated with a lower polyp miss rate, whereas sessile or flat shape and left location were significantly associated with a higher miss rate. Adequacy of cleansing, presence of diverticula, and duration of withdrawal for the first procedure were not associated with adenoma miss rate.
Conclusions: We confirm a significant miss rate for polyps or adenoma during colonoscopy. Detection of flat polyps is an issue that must be focused on to improve the quality of colonoscopy.
References
1
Hixson L J, Fennerty M B, Sampliner R E. et al .
Prospective study of the frequency and size distribution of polyps missed by colonoscopy.
J Natl Cancer Inst.
1990;
82
1769-1772
2
Rex D K, Cutler C S, Lemmel G T. et al .
Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies.
Gastroenterology.
1997;
112
24-28
3
Bensen S, Mott L A, Dain B. et al .
The colonoscopic miss rate and true one-year recurrence of colorectal neoplastic polyps.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1999;
94
194-199
4
Kasugal K, Miyata M, Hashimoto T. et al .
Assessment of miss and incidence rates of neoplastic polyps at colonoscopy.
Dig Endosc.
2005;
17
44-49
5
Winawer S J, Zauber A G, Ho M N. et al. .
Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy.
N Engl J Med.
1993;
329
1977-1981
6
Winawer S J, Zauber A G.
Colonoscopic polypectomy and the incidence of colorectal cancer.
Gut.
2001;
48
753-754
7
Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler C M. et al .
Does a negative screening colonoscopy ever need to be repeated?.
Gut.
1996;
55
1145-1150
8
Rex D K, Bond J H, Feld A D.
Medical-legal risks of incident cancers after clearing colonoscopy.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2001;
96
952-957
9
Rex D K, Lieberman D A.
Feasibility of colonoscopy screening: discussion of issues and recommendations regarding implementation.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2001;
54
662-667
10
Haseman J H, Lemmel G T, Rahmani E Y, Rex D K.
Failure of colonoscopy to detect colorectal cancer; evaluation of 47 cases in 20 hospitals.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1997;
45
451-455
11
Bressler B, Paszat L F, Winden C. et al .
Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer; a population-based analysis.
Gastroenterology.
2004;
127
452-456
12
Schoen R E.
Surveillance after positive and negative colonoscopy examinations; issues, yields, and use.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2003;
98
1237-1246
13
Pabby A, Schoen R E, Weissfeld J L. et al .
Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary polyp prevention trial.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2005;
61
385-391
14
Graham M, Jegendirabose P, Leiper K.
WED-E-278 colonoscopic miss-rate for colorectal cancer in usual clinical practice.
Endoscopy.
2005;
37
A275
15
Panadès A, Seoane A, Torra S. et al .
MON-G-274 colonoscopic miss rates for colorectal cancer.
Gut.
2005;
54
A139
16
Robertson D J, Mott L, Baron J A,. the Polyp Prevention Study Group .
Colorectal cancer after ”clearing” colonoscopy: experience from 3 large adenoma chemoprevention trials.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2003;
98
S123
17
Lieberman D.
Quality and colonoscopy; a new imperative.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2005;
61
392-394
18
Ee H C, Semmens J B, Hoffman N E. for the Perth Teaching Hospitals Endoscopy Group .
Complete colonoscopy rarely misses cancer.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2002;
55
167-171
19
Pickhardt P J, Choi J R, Hwang I. et al .
Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults.
New Engl J Med.
2003;
349
2191-2200
20
Cotton P B, Durkalski V L, Pineau B C. et al .
Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia.
JAMA.
2004;
291
1713-1719
21
Van Rijn J, Reitsma J B, Stoker J. et al .
Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2006;
101
343-350
22
Church J M.
Clinical significance of small colorectal polyps.
Dis Colon Rectum.
2004;
47
481-485
23
Gschwantler M, Kriwanek S, Langner E. et al .
High-grade dysplasia and invasive carcinoma in colorectal adenomas: a multivariate analysis of the impact of adenoma and patient characteristics.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2002;
14
183-188
24
Nusko G, Mansmann U, Altendorf-Hofmann A. et al .
Risk of invasive carcinoma in colorectal adenomas assessed by size and site.
Int J Colorect Dis.
1997;
12
267-271
25
Butterly L F, Chase M P, Pohl H, Fiarman G S.
Prevalence of clinically important histology in small adenomas.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2006;
4
343-348
26
Bressler B, Paszat L, Rothwell D. et al .
Predictors of missed colorectal cancer during colonoscopy: a population-based analysis.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
61
AB107
27
Sanchez W, Harewood G C, Petersen B T.
Evaluation of polyp detection in relation to procedure time of screening or surveillance colonoscopy.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2004;
99
1941-1945
28
Barclay R I, Vicari J J, Doughty A S. et al .
Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.
N Engl J Med.
2006;
355
2533-2541
29
Rex D K.
Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2000;
51
33-36
30
Simmons D T, Harewood G C, Baron T H. et al .
Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther.
2006;
24
965-971
D. Heresbach, MD, PhD
Service des Maladies de #l’Appareil Digestif CHU Pontchaillou
35033 Rennes Cedex 09 France
Fax: +33-299-284189
Email: denis.heresbach@chu-rennes.fr