Identification and characterisation of a novel aberrant pattern of intron 1 inversion with concomitant large insertion and deletion within the F8 gene

Summary

Intron 1 inversion (Inv1) is a recurrent causative mutation of haemophilia A (HA) and is responsible for 1–5% of severe HA. Inv1 occurs as a result of intra-chromosomal homologous recombination between int1h-1 within intron 1 and int1h-2 located in approximately 125 kb telomeric to the F8 gene. In this report, we presented a previously undescribed aberrant type of Inv1 with complex genomic rearrangement in a pedigree with severe HA. The breakpoints of the rearrangement were identified by the genome walking technique; copy number variations (CNVs) of the F8 gene and X chromosome were detected by AccuCopy technique, Affymetrix CytoScan HD CNV assay and quantitative PCR (qPCR); the F8 transcripts related to the aberrant Inv1 were analysed by reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR). We have characterised the exact breakpoints of the complex rearrangement, and determined the location and size of the insertion and deletion. The rearrangements can be summarised as an aberrant pattern of Inv1 with a deletion of 2.56 kb and a duplication of 227.3 kb inserted in the rejoining junction within the F8 gene. Our results suggested that this complex genomic rearrangement was generated by two distinct repair mechanisms of fork stalling and template switching/microhomology-mediated break-induced replication (FoSTeS/MMBIR) and nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR).

Keywords

Copy number variants - genomic rearrangement - haemophilia A - intron 1 inversion

• References

• 1 Lenting PJ, van Mourik JA, Mertens K. The life cycle of coagulation factor VIII in view of its structure and function. Blood 1998; 92: 3983-3996.
• 2 Gouw SC, van den Berg HM, Oldenburg J. et al. F8 gene mutation type and inhibitor development in patients with severe haemophilia A: systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood 2012; 119: 2922-2934.
• 3 Lakich D, Kazazian Jr HH, Antonarakis SE. et al. Inversions disrupting the factor VIII gene are a common cause of severe haemophilia A. Nat Genet 1993; 05: 236-241.
• 4 Bagnall RD, Waseem N, Green PM. et al. Recurrent inversion breaking intron 1 of the factor VIII gene is a frequent cause of severe haemophilia A. Blood 2002; 99: 168-174.
• 5 Brinke A, Tagliavacca L, Naylor J. et al. Two chimaeric transcription units result from an inversion breaking intron 1 of the factor VIII gene and a region reportedly affected by reciprocal translocations in T-cell leukaemia. Hum Mol Genet 1996; 05: 1945-1951.
• 6 Schroder J, El-Maarri O, Schwaab R. et al. Factor VIII intron-1 inversion: frequency and inhibitor prevalence. J Thromb Haemost 2006; 04: 1141-1143.
• 7 Sanna V, Ceglia C, Tarsitano M. et al. Aberrant F8 gene intron 1 inversion with concomitant duplication and deletion in a severe haemophilia A patient from Southern Italy. J Thromb Haemost 2013; 11: 195-197.
• 8 Pio SF, Oliveira GC, Soares S. et al. An aberrant pattern for intron 1 inversion of factor VIII gene. Haemophilia 2011; 17: 708-709.
• 9 Zimmermann MA, Oldenburg J, Muller CR. et al. Unusual genomic rearrangements in introns 1 and 22 of the F8 gene. Hamostaseologie 2011; 31 (Suppl. 01) S69-73.
• 10 Badoz M, Pellechia D, Fretigny M. et al. Unusual intron 1 inversion with concomitant large duplication within the F8 gene in a severe haemophilia A patient. J Thromb Haemost 2009; 07 (Suppl. 02) s807.
• 11 Lu YL, Wang XF, Ding QL. et al. Prevalence of the factor 8 gene intron 1 inversion in Chinese haemophiliacs and its application to carrier detection and prenatal diagnosis in haemophilia A families. Haemophilia 2011; 17: 541-542.
• 12 Guo H, Xiong J. A specific and versatile genome walking technique. Gene 2006; 381: 18-23.
• 13 You GL, Ding QL, Lu YL. et al. Characterisation of large deletions in the F8 gene using multiple competitive amplification and the genome walking technique. J Thromb Haemost 2013; 11: 1103-1110.
• 14 Liu YG, Whittier RF. Thermal asymmetric interlaced PCR: automatable amplification and sequencing of insert end fragments from P1 and YAC clones for chromosome walking. Genomics 1995; 25: 674-681.
• 15 Du R, Lu C, Jiang Z. et al. Efficient typing of copy number variations in a segmental duplication-mediated rearrangement hotspot using multiplex competitive amplification. J Hum Genet 2012; 57: 545-551.
• 16 El-Maarri O, Herbiniaux U, Graw J. et al. Analysis of mRNA in haemophilia A patients with undetectable mutations reveals normal splicing in the factor VIII gene. J Thromb Haemost 2005; 03: 332-339.
• 17 El-Maarri O, Singer H, Klein C. et al. Lack of F8 mRNA: a novel mechanism leading to haemophilia A. Blood 2006; 107: 2759-2765.
• 18 Hastings PJ, Lupski JR, Rosenberg SM. et al. Mechanisms of change in gene copy number. Nat Rev Genet 2009; 10: 551-564.
• 19 Gu W, Zhang F, Lupski JR. Mechanisms for human genomic rearrangements. Pathogenetics 2008; 01: 4.
• 20 Zhang F, Khajavi M, Connolly AM. et al. The DNA replication FoSTeS/MMBIR mechanism can generate genomic, genic and exonic complex rearrangements in humans. Nat Genet 2009; 41: 849-853.
• 21 Lee JA, Carvalho CM, Lupski JR. A DNA replication mechanism for generating nonrecurrent rearrangements associated with genomic disorders. Cell 2007; 131: 1235-1247.
• 22 Hastings PJ, Ira G, Lupski JR. A microhomology-mediated break-induced replication model for the origin of human copy number variation. PLoS Genet 2009; 05: e1000327.
• 23 Vissers LE, Bhatt SS, Janssen IM. et al. Rare pathogenic microdeletions and tandem duplications are microhomology-mediated and stimulated by local genomic architecture. Hum Mol Genet 2009; 18: 3579-3593.