Background
Although the injury to the peripheral nervous system is a common clinical problem,
a clear understanding of both morphological and pathophysiological alterations associated
with this entity is incomplete [[1],[2],[3],[4]]. A basic understanding of specific peripheral nerve biology is critical for the
process of nerve degeneration and regeneration. In the clinical setting, the ability
to manipulate nerve biology at the cellular level provides a significant improvement
in nerve recovery [[2],[5]]. In the last decade, some substances such as tacrolimus, an immunosuppressive agent,
and alpha-lipoic acid have been shown to protect peripheral nerve from ischemic degeneration
[[6],[7]]. However, controversy still exists regarding peripheral nerve injuries with potentially
devastating results at the moment.
On the other hand, the pineal gland, a neuroendocrine transducer organ with neuronal
input and endocrine output, produces the hormone of darkness, melatonin (N-acetyl-5-methoxytryptamine),
shown in the peripheral nerve tissue [[8]]. It is well known that melatonin inhibits the process of peripheral nerve degeneration
and has a neuroprotective action in a variety of pathological processes including
ischemic injury, edema formation, and infarction in experimental studies [[3],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14]]. Recently, it was reported that this protective effect has been linked with its
inhibitory role on mitochondria via signaling [[15]]. Indeed, the growing knowledge about this substance is reflected in the steadily
increasing number of publications. To our knowledge, however, there is no stereological
study in the literature, which specifically addresses the effects of neonatal pinealectomy
on peripheral nerve architecture.
This study was undertaken to investigate the effects of neonatal pinealectomy upon
the ultrastructural features of peripheral nerve in the chickens, and thus to provide
a better understanding of the role of melatonin in nerve degeneration and regeneration.
Materials and methods
Reagents
Chloramine-T, p-dimetylaminobenzaldehyde, and L-hydroxyproline as standard were purchased
from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, USA). Sodium acetate, citric acid, perchloric
acid, n-propanol, sodium hydroxide, and acetic acid were purchased from Merck Chemical
Co. (Darmstadt, Germany).
Animals
The ethical committee of Ege University School of Medicine approved all experimental
procedures employed in the study. Experiments were performed using 30 newly hatched
Hybro Broiler chickens weighing 40-70 g each. Three day-old chicks were obtained from
a local hatchery (Institute of Agricultural Research of Erbeyli). They were kept in
individual cages under constant laboratory conditions (20 to 22°C room temperature
and a 12-hour light/dark cycle). They were given free access to commercial diet and
water ad libitum. The chickens were divided randomly into two groups: unpinealectomized
control group (n = 15) and surgical pinealectomy group (n = 15) on the day of experiment.
Neonatal pinealectomy
Neonatal pinealectomy was done under the general anesthesia of intraperitoneal sodium
pentobarbital (Nembutal sodium®, Abbott Laboratories Comp., İstanbul-Türkiye, 40 mg/kg), as described previously
[[16]]. In brief, after shaving the part of under surgical intervention was disinfected
using polyvidon iyod. In aseptic conditions, a 2-cm midline incision was made through
the skin above the superior sagittal sinus and was extended posteriorly to just below
the confluence of sinuses and a skull flap was raised with a scalpel. Then the pineal
gland, which lies just beneath the dura mater and between two cerebral hemispheres
and cerebellum, was taken out by using a microsurgical forceps after cutting from
its pedicle. The skin was sutured with vicryl 6/0.
Histology
At the end of the experiment (8 weeks later), 10 animals from each experimental group
were randomly selected and sacrificed for histopathological evaluation. In each animal,
right sciatic nerve was exposed and a nerve segment of 10 mm in length was carefully
removed. Then, the excised segments were cut into blocks of equal length followed
by fixation with 2% glutaraldehyde buffered in cacodylate 0.1 M and 2% paraformaldehyde
solution (pH 7.4) for 24 hours after fixation. After fixation tissues were rinsed
in cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) twice. Following this step, specimens were postfixed
in 1% osmium tetroxide for 2 hours, dehydrated in an ascending alcohol series and
took into propylene oxide two times. After this, the tissues were embedded in epoxy
resin. Following hardening, serial semi-thin sections of 1-μm thickness were cut by
using a LKB 11800 ultramicrotome (Bromma, Sweden). The resin was removed from epoxy
embedded tissue sections [[17],[18]]. Then, the sections were stained with 1% toluidine blue [[19]] and examined under light microscopy.
Stereological analysis
Stereological analyses of sciatic nerves by an observer blinded to the groups were
done according to principles described by Larsen [[20]] and Geuna et al. [[21]]. The sampled sections, 1-μm-thickness, were examined with a modified light microscope,
which has a counting frame in the eyepiece, and dial indicators attached to the stage
of microscopes [[22]]. To obtain an estimation of total axon number in an unbiased manner from nerve
cross-section, the unbiased counting frame with 900 μm2 in area was utilized [[23]]. The section of each nerve was examined in a systematic uniform random manner ([Fig. 1]) and nerve fibers were counted if they were in a countable position (Figs. [2] and [3A]). Area sampling of nerve section was done with a 100 × 100-μm successive, systemic-random
steps. This ensures that all locations within a nerve cross section are equally represented
and that all axon profiles are sampled with an equal probability regardless of shape,
size, orientation and location [[24],[25]]. Counting of axons was done with an objective (100× oil objective; NA = 1.25) and
total magnification was 1000 that allowed accurate recognition of myelinated nerve
fibers. Total axon number in each nerve was estimated by multiplying counted axon
numbers with reverse of the area fraction [[24]].
Figure 1 The point counting method for estimation of the cross section area of sciatic
nerve. The profile area of nerve can be estimated by placing a tested point grid on the
profile of nerve. The number of points, P, that hits the profile area multiplied by
the area associated with each grid point, a(p), is an unbiased estimate of cross section
area of nerve. A = a (p)·ΣP. The same approach can be also used for estimation of
cross section area of axon.
Figure 2 The counting principle of the axon number in nerve cross-section. The section of nerve is sampled in a systematic random manner to gain an unbiased
estimation of total axon number in a nerve. Each square represents a sampling area.
An unbiased counting frame is seen in the center of this area. The axons are counted
if nerve fiber being in the unbiased counting frame (f) in each sampling area. Estimates
of the total number of myelinated axons are calculated as the product of the number
of axons counted in a known fraction and multiplied by the inverse sampling fraction.
In this study, upper and right lines of unbiased counting frames represent the inclusion
lines (dot lines) and the lower and left lines including the extensions are the exclusion
lines. Any profile of myelinated nerve fiber section hitting the exclusion lines is
excluded and profile of nerve fiber hitting the inclusion lines and located inside
the frame are counted.
Figure 3 (A) A micrograph of nerve cross-section with an unbiased counting frame superimposed
on it. Axons within the unbiased counting frame that are in countable position were marked
with stars. Toluidine blue staining, scale bar = 10 μm. (B) The same micrograph with
the point counting grid superimposed on it. If an axon is crossed with the right corner
of the unbiased counting frame during systematic random sampling, cross section areas
of this axon was estimated by means of counting the test points of grid coincide into
the axon.
After the counting of the axons in a systematic random manner, myelin thickness and
axon cross-sectional area (CSA) were measured at a stereology workstation, consisting
of a modified light microscope (Leica, Germany), a motorized specimen stage for automatic
sampling (Prior, Rockland, MA, USA), an electronic microcator (Heidenhain, Traunreut,
Germany), a CCD colour video camera (JVC, Tokyo, Japan), a PC with frame grabber board
(type FlashPoint 3D, Integral Technologies, Indianapolis, IN, USA) and stereology
software (CAST; Olympus, Glostrup, Denmark) and a 17” PC monitor (Hyundai, South Korea)
([Fig. 3B]). Myelin thickness of an axon was measured with length measurement of the software
if it crossed with the right corner of the unbiased counting frame. After measuring
myelin thickness, measurement values of CSA for both axon and nerve were obtained
by superimposing of a test point grid [a(p) = 11,6 μm2] on that sampled axons (100× Leica, Plan Apo oil objective; NA = 1.40; 5107×). Coefficient
of error (CE) and coefficient of variation (CV) for stereological analysis were estimated
[[26],[27],[28]].
Biochemical measurement
In each animal, the left sciatic nerve was isolated and removed for biochemical analysis.
Samples of the sciatic nerve were stored at -85°C until the analysis for the collagen
content. The amino acid hydroxyproline was determined by a method of Reddy and Enwemeka
[[29]]. One hundred μl 2N NaOH were added each of tissue samples (approximately 20 mg),
and then samples were hydrolyzed by autoclaving at 120°C for 30 minutes. Then, hydrolyzed
samples were mixed with a buffered chloramine-T reagent, and the oxidation was allowed
to proceed for 25 minutes at room temperature. The chromophore was then developed
with the addition of Erlich’s reagent, and the absorbance of reddish purple complex
was measured at 550 nm using a spectrophotometer. Absorbance values were plotted against
the concentration of standard hydroxyproline, and the presence of hydroxyproline is
unknown tissue extracts was determined from standard curve. Based on an assumption
that 12.5% of collagen is hydroxyproline [[30],[31]], sciatic nerve total collagen content were measured and expressed as μg hydroxyproline/mg
of wet tissue weight.
Data analysis
All data are presented as the mean ± standard error of measurements (SEM). All statistical
procedures were performed using SPSS statistical software package program (9.0, SPSS
Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). The statistical analysis of the data was carried out by using
Mann-Whitney U-test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
All chickens showed no evidence of gross neurophysiologic deficit and no wound infections
were noted in the postoperative period. At the end of the experiment, histological
examination of the brains of the animals in neonatal pinealectomy group revealed that
the pineal gland had been removed at surgery and no extraneous tissue had been left
behind or had regenerated.
Histological examination of the specimens revealed an appearance of normal sciatic
nerve in control group, while the presence of partly myelin sheath degeneration, increasing
of vacuolization in the myelin and elevation of axon diameter in neonatal pinealectomy
group ([Fig. 4]). Quantitative stereological evaluations for axon numbers, thickness of the myelin
sheath of a nerve fiber, and CSA of both axon and nerve were performed in the sciatic
nerve segment in both experimental groups. The results of axon numbers in both groups
were summarized in [Table 1]. The axon number in surgical pinealectomy group was higher than the unpinealectomized
control group, although a significant difference was not observed between groups (p
< 0.05). The results of the mean myelin sheath thickness of a nerve fiber in all groups
were summarized in [Table 2]. The mean myelin sheath thickness was increased in neonatal pinealectomy group as
compared with unpinealectomized control group (1.821 ± 0.136 μm versus 1.715 ± 0.110
μm). However, no significant differences were found between groups (p > 0.05). In
the comparison of axonal CSA, a significant difference was found between surgical
pinealectomy and control group (p < 0.05) ([Table 3]). Thus, neonatal pinealectomy procedure resulted in an increased axon number, thickness
of the myelin sheath, and CSA of the axon. However, there was no significant difference
in the means of CSA of the nerve for both groups (p > 0.05) ([Table 4]).
Table 1
Comparison of the mean axon numbers for both groups of chickens at 8 weeks after neonatal
pinealectomy.
Groups
|
Number of axons*
|
Surgical pinealectomy group (n = 10)
|
6811.444 ± 249.367
|
Unpinealectomized control group (n = 10)
|
6168.000 ± 219.034
|
p value
|
0.07
|
* Data are presented as the means ± standard error of measurement (SEM).
Table 2
Comparison of the mean thickness of the myelin sheath for both groups of chickens
at 8 weeks after neonatal pinealectomy.
Groups
|
Thickness of the myelin sheath of the nerve fiber (μm)*
|
Surgical pinealectomy group (n = 10)
|
1.821 ± 0.136
|
Unpinealectomized control group (n = 10)
|
1.715 ± 0.110
|
p value
|
0.66
|
* Data are presented as the means ± standard error of measurement (SEM).
Table 3
Comparison of the mean cross-sectional area of the axon for both groups of chickens
at 8 weeks after neonatal pinealectomy.
Groups
|
CSA of the axon (μm2)*
|
Surgical pinealectomy group (n = 10)
|
21.483 ± 1.37
|
Unpinealectomized control group (n = 10)
|
17.523 ± 0.73†
|
p value
|
0.02
|
CSA cross-sectional area.
* Data are presented as the means ± standard error of measurement (SEM).
† Surgical pinealectomy group had significantly larger CSA than the unpinealectomized
control group (p < 0.05).
Table 4
Comparison of the mean cross-sectional area of the nerve for both groups of chickens
at 8 weeks after neonatal pinealectomy.
Groups
|
CSA of the nerve (μm2)
|
Surgical pinealectomy group (n = 10)
|
897270.727 ± 57135.478
|
Unpinealectomized control group (n = 10)
|
762857.143 ± 57688.719
|
p value
|
0.10
|
CSA cross-sectional area.
* Data are presented as the means ± standard error of measurement (SEM).
Figure 4 The micrographs of nerve cross-section of unpinealectomized control (A) and
surgical pinealectomy group (B) chickens. Partly myelin sheath degeneration, increasing of vacuolization in the myelin sheath
and elevation of axon diameter in the sciatic nerve of pinealectomy group were observed
in comparison of the control chickens (B). Toluidine blue staining, scale bar for
A and B = 10 μm.
The results of collagen content of the sciatic nerve of the chickens were summarized
in [Table 5]. Total collagen contents was found to be higher in neonatal pinealectomy group in
comparison with control group (1343.612 ± 106.167 μg/g wet tissue versus 916.823 ±
159.202 μg/g wet tissue), although there was no significant difference in the means
of hydroxyproline content of the sciatic nerves of the chickens for both groups (p
> 0.05).
Table 5
Comparison of the mean hydroxyproline contents of the nerve tissue in both groups
of chickens at 8 weeks after neonatal pinealectomy.
Groups
|
Tissue hydroxyproline content (μg/g wet tissue)*
|
Surgical pinealectomy group (n = 10)
|
1343.612 ± 106.167
|
Unpinealectomized control group (n = 10)
|
916.823 ± 159.202
|
p value
|
0.06
|
* Data are presented as the means ± standard error of measurement (SEM).
The CV data of each group was given in [Table 6]. CVs of pinealectomy group are higher in comparison with unpinealectomized controls.
Nevertheless, the CE value of unpinealectomized controls for mean axon number is higher
than that of pinealectomy group, 3.5% and 3.4%, respectively (data not shown).
Table 6
The mean coefficient of variation for both groups of chickens at 8 weeks after neonatal
pinealectomy.
Parameters related with nerve fiber
|
CV of groups
|
|
Unpinealectomized control
|
Surgical pinealectomy
|
Mean axon number
|
0.07
|
0.10
|
Mean CSA of the axon (μm2)
|
0.10
|
0.21
|
Mean CSA of the nerve (μm2)
|
0.20
|
0.21
|
Mean myelin sheath thickness (μm)
|
0.14
|
0.21
|
CSA cross-sectional area, CV coefficient of variation.
Discussion
The major finding of this study is that the number of axon, myelin sheath thickness
and axonal CSA of the sciatic nerve of chicks pinealectomized at 3 days after hatching
were increased in comparison of unpinealectomized control chicks. Pinealectomy procedure
resulted in increasing of quantitative feature of sciatic nerve as seen in transection
of a peripheral nerve [[25],[32]]. Pinealectomy procedure did not result in pronounced myelin degeneration as seen
in the photochemically induced ischemic injury of sciatic nerve [[33],[34],[35]]. Increasing of nerve fiber myelin sheath thickness and especially CSA of axon may
depend on morphological alterations in the ultrastructural features of the nerve fiber.
It is well known that the neurofilaments are major determinants of axon caliber [[36]]. Increased axon caliber might be over expression of microfilament in neuron of
the pinealectomized animals. Since an accumulation of neurofilaments is seen in regenerating
axons and this accumulation is attributed to the presence of constrictive forces [[37]]. Vacuolization area in myelin sheath was increased in pinealectomized group in
comparison of the control group as observed after ischemia-reperfusion of sciatic
nerve in the rat [[14]]. Sayan et al. [[14]] also found a neuroprotective effect of melatonin on morphological features of peripheral
nerves after ischemia-reperfusion. In our study, the morphological and biochemical
parameters of the sciatic nerve in neonatal pinealectomy group were significantly
higher than from the control values of the unpinealectomized animals. According to
the results of the present study, however, we did not observe a statistically significant
difference in the myelin sheath thickness and axon number between pinealectomized
and unpinealectomized chicks. This might be due to animals, since we used newly hatched
animals for our experiment. From some earlier studies on the possible role of aging
in nerve regeneration, it appears that the outcome from peripheral nerve repair is
better in young than adults [[38]].
Biochemically, the presence of the amino acid hydroxyproline in collagen (about 11-13%)
is a unique feature because this amino acid occurs in only a few other proteins like
elastin [[30],[31]]. Therefore, hydroxyproline has been used for many years as a means of determining
the amount of collagen present in a tissue. The data reported herein clearly demonstrated
that the collagen content of the sciatic nerve in the pinealectomized chickens was
higher than those in control animals. The experimental data provide information supporting
the role of melatonin in the treatment of oxidative neuronal damage following ischemia
or trauma [[9],[10],[12],[14],[15],[39],[40]]. Since pinealectomy procedure was performed in animals aged 3 days in the current
study, any conclusions cannot be drawn about the effect of pinealectomy on the collagen
content of the sciatic nerve in old chickens.
The pineal hormone melatonin is synthesized in the pinealocytes of the pineal gland
with an endogenous rhythm and is involved in the regulation of many physiological
processes such as circadian rhythm, reproduction and immunoregulation in humans. At
present, there are a number of pathological conditions, which are said to be improved
by administration of melatonin [[10],[12],[13],[14],[33],[39],[40]]. Axonal degeneration process in the peripheral nerve may be inhibited by exogenous
melatonin administration [[33],[34]]. It is shown to play an important role as a neuroprotective agent against a wide
variety of processes that damage tissues by free radicals [[9],[10],[12],[13],[14],[15],[39],[40]]. At present, it is accepted that the antioxidative enzymes such as superoxide dismutase,
glutathione peroxidase and glutathione reductase are also stimulated by melatonin
[[5],[10],[12],[13],[14],[40]]. Recently, Andrabi et al. [[15]] suggested that melatonin has also an anti-apoptotic effect, by inhibition of the
mitochondrial permeability. However, the effects of melatonin on the morphometric
features of the peripheral nerve are not yet clearly established. The current investigation
was undertaken to study the effects of melatonin deprival upon nerve fiber number
as well as nerve morphology in chickens. It is apparent that the newly hatched chick
is a useful experimental model for the investigation of the morphological effects
of melatonin on sciatic nerve, although its mechanism has not been elucidated. To
the authors’ knowledge, no stereological study on the effects of melatonin on peripheral
nerve morphometry exists.
The presented results clearly show that neonatal pinealectomy has a negative effect
upon sciatic nerve in chickens. However, the current study has certain limitations.
First, the group size at least for pinealectomized group was not large because their
CV is higher in comparison with unpinealectomized controls although the sciatic nerve
specimens of each animal in all groups were investigated. Second, not all the animals
in the study could be examined for stereological analysis because a part of the animals
was used for biochemical study. Third, some features of the peripheral nerve tissue
are different between chickens and human. Also, the measurement of collagen content
of sciatic nerve tissue would provide some data regarding the effects of melatonin
on the pathophysiological features of the peripheral nerve, as it is considered to
play a regulatory role in the collagen content of the nerve tissue [[33],[34]]. Future studies will involve the use of density of melatonin receptors in the investigation
of the effects of melatonin upon peripheral nerve regeneration. Thus, we could prove
if melatonin has a direct effect in modulating of this relationship.
Conclusion
Consequently, the data mentioned above allow postulating that the pineal gland/melatonin
most likely influence morphological parameters of the peripheral nerve and a possible
mechanism of this relationship might involve endogenous hormonal and growth factors
playing a fundamental role in tissue regeneration process. This is the first quantitative
stereological study investigating the possible role of neonatal pinealectomy in the
development of morphological changes in peripheral nerve architecture in chickens.
Our quantitative data did show differences between the experimental and control groups.
However, the morphological investigation demonstrated that the pinealectomy and/or
the absence of the melatonin have negative effect on the peripheral nerves. The chick
provides a reliable, useful animal model to characterize the biological effects of
melatonin on the development of the peripheral nervous system in detail. Based on
our results, thus, it is possible to postulate that melatonin treatment can be utilized
to improve various degenerative disorders of the peripheral nerves. However, further
experimental and clinical studies will be needed before melatonin can be widely recommended
because of many unanswered questions.
Abbreviations
CSA:
cross-sectional area
CV:
coefficient of variation
SEM:
standard error of measurements
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
The authors of this paper indicated in the title made substantial contributions to
the following tasks of research: initial conception and design (MT, SK, ÇY, MB); administrative,
technical, or material support (MT, SK, MB, ÇY, MB); acquisition of data (MT, SK,
ZBU, SY, ÇY, BŞ, YU, MB); laboratory analysis and interpretation of data (MT, SK,
MB, ÇY, YU, MB); drafting of the manuscript (MT, SK, YU); critical revision of the
manuscript for important intellectual content (MT, SK, ZBU, MB, SY, ÇY, BŞ, YU, MB).
All authors read and approved the final manuscript. The views expressed herein are
those of the authors and not necessarily their institutions or sources of support.
Cite this article as: Turgut et al., Stereological analysis of sciatic nerve in chickens following neonatal pinealectomy:
an experimental study Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury 2010, 5:10