Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1590/0004-282X20170059
The direct first pass aspiration technique in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke resulting from large vessel occlusions
Técnica de aspiração primária no tratamento do acidente vascular cerebral isquêmico por oclusões de grandes vasos
ABSTRACT
Mechanical thrombectomy using stent retrievers is the standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke that results from large vessel occlusions. The direct aspiration first pass technique (ADAPT) has been proposed as an efficient, fast, and cost-effective thrombectomy strategy. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of ADAPT.
Methods
Recanalization was assessed using the modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) score. Neurological outcomes were assessed using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and modified Rankin Scale.
Results
Fifteen patients were evaluated. The mTICI score was 2b-3 in 80%, and it was 3 in 60% of patients. No intracranial hemorrhage was seen. At three months, modified Rankin Scale scores ≤ 2 were observed in 60% of patients and the mortality rate was 13.3%.
Conclusions
The ADAPT appears to be a safe, effective, and fast recanalization strategy for treatment of acute ischemic stroke resulting from large vessel occlusions.
#
RESUMO
A trombectomia mecânica com stent retrievers é o tratamento padrão ouro do acidente vascular cerebral isquêmico agudo (AVCi) por oclusão de grandes artérias. A técnica de aspiração primária (ADAPT) tem sido proposta como uma estratégia de trombectomia rápida e com boa custo-efetividade. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a segurança e eficácia da técnica ADAPT.
Métodos
A recanalização foi avaliada utilizando a escala mTICI. Os desfechos neurológicos foram avaliados utilizando as escalas do NIHSS e mRS.
Resultados
Quinze pacientes foram avaliados. Foram obtidas taxas de mTICI = 2b-3 em 80% e TICI = 3 em 60% dos pacientes. Não ocorreram hemorragias intracranianas. Em 3 meses as taxas de mRS≤2 e mortalidade foram respectivamente 60% e 13.3%.
Conclusão
A técnica ADAPT parece ser uma estratégia de recanalização rápida, segura e efetiva para o tratamento do AVC por oclusão de grandes artérias.
#
Mechanical thrombectomy, using stent retrievers as an adjunct to intravenous thrombolysis, is the standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) that results from carotid or proximal middle cerebral artery occlusions[1],[2],[3]. This treatment strategy improves functional outcomes for patients if started within the first six hours of symptom onset. More complete and faster recanalization and more pronounced brain collaterals are among the most important variables directly associated with better neurologic outcomes after endovascular treatment of AIS. Although these concepts were already known, the introduction of stent retrievers in the endovascular armamentarium represented a cornerstone for achieving more complete and faster recanalizations, which consistently improves neurologic outcomes across results of recent trials[2],[3]. Despite emerging endovascular stent retriever technology, AIS resulting from large vessel occlusions (LVOs) remains a serious condition. In general, even among patients receiving the best stroke management, AIS from LVOs leads to poor functional outcomes 50% to 60% of the time and mortality 10% to 20% of the time[2],[3]. Therefore, ameliorations in stroke care are still needed and, in this context, strategies to improve complete recanalization rates and reduce procedure times should be continuously pursued. The direct aspiration first pass technique (ADAPT), using large bore aspiration catheters, has been proposed as an efficient, fast, and cost-effective thrombectomy strategy and may improve rates of complete recanalization while reducing procedure times[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12]
The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of ADAPT using the 5MAX-ACE catheter (Penumbra, Oakland, California, USA) for treatment of acute stroke resulting from LVOs.
METHODS
Patients, clinical and imaging assessments, and follow-up
We prospectively evaluated data from 15 consecutive patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy for AIS secondary to LVO between November 2015 and January 2016. The study was approved by the ethics committee at our institution. Patients, or their legal representatives, signed consent forms, which were previously approved by the institutional review board. All patients underwent a brain CT scan and a supra-aortic vessel CT angiography at admission to assess the arterial occlusion site. On the preprocedure brain CT, the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) was assessed for all patients. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was determined by stroke neurologists upon patient admission to hospital and again 24 hours after admission. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was assessed on admission and at the three-month follow-up by a stroke neurologist. Of 15 patients treated at our institution, nine (60.0%) were men, and the mean age was 66.1 years (SD = 13). Baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scales ranged from 6 to 30 (mean = 21.2, SD = 7.4), and baseline mRS ranged from 0 to 3 (median = 0, mean = 0.7, SD = 1).
In general, patients were assessed for eligibility for intravenous thrombolysis using the National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and the European Cooperative Stroke Study 3 trial criteria[13],[14]. If indicated, patients presenting with LVOs received intravenous thrombolysis and were immediately referred for thrombectomy. We included patients whose ASPECTS scores were at least 6 within the first six hours of symptom onset. We did not define a limited time window for performing endovascular treatment of posterior circulation stroke. We also did not define specific cut-offs in patient age, previous clinical conditions, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, or baseline mRS for indicating thrombectomy. Patients presenting with LVOs who were ineligible for intravenous fibrinolysis were treated with direct thrombectomy.
#
Endovascular procedure
Each patient was transferred to our angiography suite, where thrombectomy was performed by our interventional neuroradiology team using ADAPT with a 5MAX-ACE catheter (Penumbra, Oakland, CA, USA). Local anesthesia and conscious sedation were used. General anesthesia via intubation was performed if necessary at the discretion of the neurointerventional staff and the anesthesiologist.
All procedures were performed using the femoral artery approach. An intravenous bolus (5,000 IU) of standard heparin was administered after puncture if intravenous thrombolysis was not previously indicated. If intravenous thrombolysis was indicated prior to the endovascular procedure, no heparin was administered after the femoral puncture. An 8-Fr guiding catheter (Guider Softip; Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) or a NeuronMax 088 sheath (Penumbra, Alameda, CA) or a 7-Fr Destination (Pinacle-Terumo) was introduced through a femoral sheath into the internal carotid artery or the most navigable vertebral artery. The guiding catheter was continuously perfused with 10 mg milrinone diluted in 1,000 mL of physiological saline (0.9%). Frontal, oblique, and lateral angiographies were completed to determine the cervical vessel related to the ischemic territory of the brain and to define the occluded intracranial vessels.
If a cervical carotid occlusion was identified, a Wallstent (Boston Scientific Target, Fremont, CA, USA) was used to perform an angioplasty stenting procedure. After this step, or if no occlusion was identified in the proximal cervical artery, a coaxial system was used to navigate to the arterial occlusion. The system consisted of a 5MAX-ACE (Penumbra), a microcatheter (3MAX [Penumbra], or Velocity (Penumbra), or a 0.027-inch Rebar 27 microcatheter [Medtronic, Irvine, CA, USA] or a 0.021-inch Orion microcatheter [Medtronic]), and a 0.014-inch steerable microwire (Transend EX Platinum; Stryker) or a 0.014-inch microwire SilverSpeed [Medtronic]. Both the microwire and the microcatheter were used to perforate the thrombus ([Figures 1] and [2]), followed by insertion of the 5MAX-ACE catheter into the thrombus. Then, the microwire and the microcatheter were removed, and the 5MAX-ACE was connected to an aspiration tube (Penumbra System) for thromboaspiration for five minutes ([Figures 1] and [2]). After five minutes, if the blood flow was blocked in the aspiration tube, the 5MAX-ACE was removed under aspiration. If, however, blood flowed freely into the aspiration tube, we aspirated the 5MAX-ACE with a 20 mL syringe and performed an angiogram through the catheter. If the artery remained occluded, we advanced the catheter 5MAX-ACE again into the thrombus to continue aspiration. We indicated thrombectomy using a stent retriever (Solitaire-FR [Microvention-Covidien, Irvine, CA] or Trevo [Stryker, Fremont, CA]) if recanalization could not be achieved after five attempts to aspirate the thrombus, or if the angiogram revealed a distal occlusion after aspiration. [Figures 1] and [2] show examples of the procedure.
Successful recanalization was defined as a modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) score of 2b or 3 in all treatable vessels. No intra-arterial thrombolysis was administered, even if the recanalization was unsuccessful. Groin punctures were closed with Angio-Seal (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN).
#
Statistical analysis
Continuous variables are presented as mean (range, ± standard deviation [SD]) or median (interquartile [IQR]). Categorical data are presented as numbers and percentages. The IBM SPSS Statistics software version 20.0 (Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis.
#
#
RESULTS
The ASPECTS scores on CT scans at admission ranged from 6 to10 (median = 10, mean = 9, SD = 1.4). The mTICI score was 2b-3 for 80% (12/15) of patients, whereas it was 3 for 60% (9/15) of patients. The median number of device passes was 2. Intravenous thrombolysis was performed in 46.7% of patients. Stent retrievers were used in two patients (13.3%). Embolization to other vascular territories was observed in one patient (6.6%) during traction of an entrapped 5MAX-ACE catheter from the basilar artery; the right post-inferior cerebellar artery remained occluded after catheter retrieval.
Procedure times ranged from 15 to 120 minutes (mean = 60.6, SD = 31.3). We had no intracranial hemorrhage, nor any kind of hemorrhagic transformation. At three months, the mRS ranged from 2 to 6 (median = 2, mean = 3.2, SD = 1.6), and it was 2 or less for 60% (9/15) of the patients. The mortality rate was 13.3% (2/15). Individual patient data are summarized in [Table 1]. Baseline patient data results are aggregated and summarized in [Tables 2] and [3]. [Table 4] summarizes all studies published on thrombus aspiration using large bore catheters for treatment of acute stroke.
#
DISCUSSION
Recent trials have consistently proven the clinical benefits of mechanical thrombectomy using stent retrievers for AIS secondary to distal carotid or proximal middle cerebral artery occlusions[1],[2],[3]. A recent meta-analysis showed that endovascular treatment resulted in good functional neurologic outcomes (mRS = 0-2) for 54% of the patients and excellent functional neurologic outcomes (mRS = 0–1) for 36% of patients. The rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and mortality were 2.5% and 12%, respectively. The recanalization rate (mTICI = 2b–3) was 71% with a mean procedure time (groin puncture to maximum mTICI score) of 38 minutes (range from 24 to 60 minutes). A complete recanalization (mTICI = 3) was achieved in 33% of patients[2],[3].
When performing an endovascular treatment of AIS, procedure times and recanalization rates are two important variables directly associated with better outcomes; therefore, efforts have been made to reduce procedure times and improve recanalization rates. Large bore aspiration devices are emerging thrombectomy devices, and they have been investigated to enhance recanalization and allow faster procedures. The 5MAX-ACE is a large bore, highly flexible, and atraumatic catheter capable of navigating through intracranial arteries, allowing for thrombus aspiration. Few studies have proposed a thrombectomy technique using simultaneous stent retrieval and aspiration with a distal access catheter[15],[16]. However, despite these new thrombectomy strategies and devices, they were not compared head-to-head with stent retrieval alone or while using ADAPT. In this setting, ADAPT appears to be a more rational and cost-effective strategy[12],[17].
In our experience, the 5MAX-ACE catheter could be safely navigated to a variety of distal M1 segments of the middle cerebral arteries or to a selection of proximal P1 segments of non-hypoplasic cerebral posterior arteries that present with favorable angles. We also noted an advantage of the 5MAX-ACE: it can be used to assess difficult cervical arteries before proceeding with intracranial thrombectomy. The coaxial system allows an atraumatic distal cervical artery position of the guide catheter, even passing though critical carotid or vertebral loops or kinks. Moreover, if aspiration alone fails, a stent retriever can be used through the large bore catheter, and retrieval can be performed under distal aspiration with the large bore catheter.
When compared to recent thrombectomy trials[2],[3], we obtained unexpectedly higher rates of good clinical outcomes, considering that 40% of our patients had basilar occlusions, 20% had carotid tandem occlusions, 60% had mean recanalization times greater than six hours, and 13% had unknown times of symptom onset[18],[19]. We obtained a relatively high rate of mTICI = 3 (60%), a low rate of adjunctive use of a stent retriever (13%), and a low rate of emboli after thrombectomy (6.6%). Another interesting finding was our zero incidence of intracranial hemorrhage, especially considering that 80% of the patients had mTICI scores of 2b-3, and 73% were treated outside the level A evidence, which is less than six hours. Our mean procedure time (one hour) was relatively long when compared to results of previous studies[2]-[12]. We believe that this finding may be explained by the use of an adjunctive stent retriever in two patients, which was demonstrated to extend procedure time by 21 minutes[20]. Where recanalization could not be achieved, we considered a maximum procedure time of 120 minutes. In addition, before preparing thrombectomy devices and systems, we routinely performed a diagnostic angiography, which may have lengthened overall procedure time (from puncture to maximum mTICI). Although this strategy may lengthen procedure times, intravenous thrombolysis eventually opened the vessel, and we were able to save devices. However, if thrombectomy devices were prepared and ready for use before femoral puncture, overall procedure time would certainly have been shortened, but with a probability of finding an opened intracranial vessel at the first angiographic run.
More data must be collected to confirm whether the ADAPT used in conjunction with stent retriever devices, compared to use of stent retrievers alone, would improve outcomes for patients presenting with AIS due to LVOs. Moreover, studies are needed to define the best recanalization strategy, aspiration or stentrievers, for distal occlusions aiming to achieve mTICI 3.
Despite encouraging results using ADAPT in our series, these findings may have an inherent statistical bias because of the small sample, and our data is exposed to random effects. Another limitation of this study is the lack of a control group.
We find that ADAPT appears to be a safe, effective, and fast recanalization strategy for treatment of acute ischemic stroke resulting from large vessel occlusions.
#
#
Conflict of interest:
There is no conflict of interest to declare.
-
References
- 1 Powers WJ, Derdeyn CP, Biller J, Coffey CS, Hoh BL, Jauch et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Regarding Endovascular Treatment: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2015;46(10):3020-35. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.20170059201700590074
- 2 Goyal M, Menon BK, Zwam WH, Dippel DW, Mitchell PJ, Demchuk AM et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. 2016;387(10029):1723-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X
- 3 Campbell BC, Hill MD, Rubiera M, Menon BK, Demchuk A, Donnan GA et al. Safety and efficacy of solitaire stent thrombectomy: individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials. Stroke. 2016;47(3):798-806. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012360
- 4 Turk AS, Spiotta A, Frei D, Mocco J, Baxter B, Fiorella D, et al. Initial clinical experience with the ADAPT technique: a direct aspiration first pass technique for stroke thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6(3):231-7. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010713
- 5 John S, Hussain MS, Toth G, Bain M, Uchino K, Hui FK. Initial experience using the 5MAX™ ACE reperfusion catheter in intra-arterial therapy for acute ischemic stroke. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2014;16(4):350-7. https://doi.org/10.7461/jcen.2014.16.4.350
- 6 Stampfl S, Kabbasch C, Muller M, Mpotsaris A, Brockmann M, Liebig T et al. Initial experience with a new distal intermediate and aspiration catheter in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: clinical safety and efficacy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8(7):714-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011801.
- 7 Jankowitz B, Grandhi R, Horev A, Aghaebrahim A, Jadhav A, Linares G et al. Primary manual aspiration thrombectomy (MAT) for acute ischemic stroke: safety, feasibility and outcomes in 112 consecutive patients. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015;7(1):27-31. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-011024
- 8 Comai A, Haglmüller T, Ferro F, Dall’Ora E, Currò Dossi R, Bonatti G. Sequential endovascular thrombectomy approach (SETA) to acute ischemic stroke: preliminary single-centre results and cost analysis. Radiol Med (Torino). 2015;120(7):655-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-015-0501-9
- 9 Delgado Almandoz JE, Kayan Y, Young ML, Fease JL, Scholz JM, Milner AM et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic strokes treated with mechanical thrombectomy using either Solumbra or ADAPT techniques. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015;8(11):1123-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012122
- 10 Romano DG, Cioni S, Vinci SL, Pero G, Comelli C, Comai A et al.. Thromboaspiration technique as first approach for approach for endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke: initial experience at nine Italian stroke centers. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9(1):6-10. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012298
- 11 Kowoll A, Weber A, Mpotsaris A, Behme D, Weber W. Direct aspiration first pass technique for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: initial experience at a European stroke center. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8(3):230-4. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011520
- 12 Vargas J, Spiotta A, Fargen K, Turner R, Chaudry I, Turk A. Long term experience using the ADAPT technique for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. NeuroIntervent Surg. 2016;pii: neurintsurg-2015-012211. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012211
- 13 Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, Brozman M, Dávalos A, Guidetti D et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(13):1317-29. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0804656
- 14 The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(24):1581-7. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199512143332401
- 15 Humphries W, Hoit D, Doss VT, Elijovich L, Frei D, Loy D et al. Distal aspiration with retrievable stent assisted thrombectomy for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015;7(2):90-4. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010986
- 16 Massari F, Henninger N, Lozano JD, Patel A, Kuhn AL, Howk M et al. ARTS (Aspiration-Retriever Technique for Stroke): initial clinical experience. Interv Neuroradiol. 2016;22(3):325-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1591019916632369
- 17 Turk AS, Turner R, Spiotta A, Vargas J, Holmstedt C, Ozark S et al. Comparison of endovascular treatment approaches for acute ischemic stroke: cost effectiveness, technical success, and clinical outcomes. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015;7(9):666-70. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011282
- 18 Son S, Choi DS, Oh MK, Hong J, Kim SK, Kang H et al. Comparison of Solitaire thrombectomy and Penumbra suction thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by basilar artery occlusion. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8(1):13-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011472
- 19 Mokin M, Sonig A, Sivakanthan S, Ren Z, Elijovich L, Arthur A et al. Clinical and procedural predictors of outcomes from the endovascular treatment of posterior circulation strokes. Stroke. 2016;47(3):782-8. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011598
- 20 Goyal M, Fargen KM, Turk AS, Mocco J, Liebeskind DS, Frei D et al. 2C or not 2C: defining an improved revascularization grading scale and the need for standardization of angiography outcomes in stroke trials. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6(2):83-6. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010665
Address for correspondence
Publication History
Received: 12 July 2016
Accepted: 20 December 2016
Article published online:
05 September 2023
© 2023. Academia Brasileira de Neurologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
References
- 1 Powers WJ, Derdeyn CP, Biller J, Coffey CS, Hoh BL, Jauch et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Regarding Endovascular Treatment: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2015;46(10):3020-35. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.20170059201700590074
- 2 Goyal M, Menon BK, Zwam WH, Dippel DW, Mitchell PJ, Demchuk AM et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. 2016;387(10029):1723-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X
- 3 Campbell BC, Hill MD, Rubiera M, Menon BK, Demchuk A, Donnan GA et al. Safety and efficacy of solitaire stent thrombectomy: individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials. Stroke. 2016;47(3):798-806. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012360
- 4 Turk AS, Spiotta A, Frei D, Mocco J, Baxter B, Fiorella D, et al. Initial clinical experience with the ADAPT technique: a direct aspiration first pass technique for stroke thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6(3):231-7. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010713
- 5 John S, Hussain MS, Toth G, Bain M, Uchino K, Hui FK. Initial experience using the 5MAX™ ACE reperfusion catheter in intra-arterial therapy for acute ischemic stroke. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2014;16(4):350-7. https://doi.org/10.7461/jcen.2014.16.4.350
- 6 Stampfl S, Kabbasch C, Muller M, Mpotsaris A, Brockmann M, Liebig T et al. Initial experience with a new distal intermediate and aspiration catheter in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: clinical safety and efficacy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8(7):714-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011801.
- 7 Jankowitz B, Grandhi R, Horev A, Aghaebrahim A, Jadhav A, Linares G et al. Primary manual aspiration thrombectomy (MAT) for acute ischemic stroke: safety, feasibility and outcomes in 112 consecutive patients. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015;7(1):27-31. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-011024
- 8 Comai A, Haglmüller T, Ferro F, Dall’Ora E, Currò Dossi R, Bonatti G. Sequential endovascular thrombectomy approach (SETA) to acute ischemic stroke: preliminary single-centre results and cost analysis. Radiol Med (Torino). 2015;120(7):655-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-015-0501-9
- 9 Delgado Almandoz JE, Kayan Y, Young ML, Fease JL, Scholz JM, Milner AM et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic strokes treated with mechanical thrombectomy using either Solumbra or ADAPT techniques. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015;8(11):1123-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012122
- 10 Romano DG, Cioni S, Vinci SL, Pero G, Comelli C, Comai A et al.. Thromboaspiration technique as first approach for approach for endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke: initial experience at nine Italian stroke centers. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9(1):6-10. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012298
- 11 Kowoll A, Weber A, Mpotsaris A, Behme D, Weber W. Direct aspiration first pass technique for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: initial experience at a European stroke center. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8(3):230-4. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011520
- 12 Vargas J, Spiotta A, Fargen K, Turner R, Chaudry I, Turk A. Long term experience using the ADAPT technique for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. NeuroIntervent Surg. 2016;pii: neurintsurg-2015-012211. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012211
- 13 Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, Brozman M, Dávalos A, Guidetti D et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(13):1317-29. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0804656
- 14 The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(24):1581-7. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199512143332401
- 15 Humphries W, Hoit D, Doss VT, Elijovich L, Frei D, Loy D et al. Distal aspiration with retrievable stent assisted thrombectomy for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015;7(2):90-4. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010986
- 16 Massari F, Henninger N, Lozano JD, Patel A, Kuhn AL, Howk M et al. ARTS (Aspiration-Retriever Technique for Stroke): initial clinical experience. Interv Neuroradiol. 2016;22(3):325-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1591019916632369
- 17 Turk AS, Turner R, Spiotta A, Vargas J, Holmstedt C, Ozark S et al. Comparison of endovascular treatment approaches for acute ischemic stroke: cost effectiveness, technical success, and clinical outcomes. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015;7(9):666-70. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011282
- 18 Son S, Choi DS, Oh MK, Hong J, Kim SK, Kang H et al. Comparison of Solitaire thrombectomy and Penumbra suction thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by basilar artery occlusion. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8(1):13-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011472
- 19 Mokin M, Sonig A, Sivakanthan S, Ren Z, Elijovich L, Arthur A et al. Clinical and procedural predictors of outcomes from the endovascular treatment of posterior circulation strokes. Stroke. 2016;47(3):782-8. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011598
- 20 Goyal M, Fargen KM, Turk AS, Mocco J, Liebeskind DS, Frei D et al. 2C or not 2C: defining an improved revascularization grading scale and the need for standardization of angiography outcomes in stroke trials. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6(2):83-6. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010665