In the wrist, the carpal bones are arranged to form the floor and sides of an arch-shaped
channel. The flexor retinaculum, or transverse carpal ligament, is a fibrous band
that attaches the medial and lateral eminences of this bone arch, forming the palmar
roof of a narrow opening called the carpal tunnel[1 ]. This tunnel encloses the median nerve and nine tendons of the flexor finger muscles.
Any pathophysiological condition or anatomic abnormality that causes enlargement of
the carpal tunnel components, reduces its cross-section or raises the pressure inside
it, can lead to symptomatic compression of the median nerve – carpal tunnel syndrome
(CTS).
Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common compressive neuropathy, with a prevalence
of 5.8% in adult women and 0.6% for men[2 ]. Generally, CTS is characterized by an insidious onset and the diagnosis is completely
clinical. Usually, the patient complains of tingling and numbness in the hand, especially
in the first three fingers and radial half of the fourth finger (the cutaneous distribution
of the median nerve), commonly associated with worsening at night. Physical examination
frequently reveals positive provocative test results, such as Tinel's sign, Phalen's
test and the carpal compression test. Sensory loss and, less frequently, motor deficit
and thenar atrophy, can be observed in neurologic examination[1 ].
In most cases, conservative treatment is the first therapeutic alternative, especially
in patients without significant sensory or motor deficits. However, despite its prevalence
and the impact of CTS on health systems, there is still much controversy regarding
optimal therapy. This can be explained by the fact that most of our knowledge about
the treatment of CTS has been based on uncontrolled trials and retrospective studies
leading to conflicting conclusions. Accordingly, this review aims to provide a comprehensive
and critical analysis of conservative treatment in the management of the CTS.
Corticosteroid injection
Corticosteroid injection has been used in the conservative treatment of CTS to reduce
symptoms. The exact mechanism of this therapy remains unclear but the anti-inflammatory
effect is probably the most significant factor in relieving symptoms[3 ]. Different types of corticoids have been used, such as hydrocortisone, dexamethasone,
methylprednisolone or triamcinolone, usually in association with a local anesthetic,
but there is no objective standard for defining the ideal dose or specific drug[3 ],[4 ]. A unique study showed no difference when comparing shorter- versus longer-acting
corticosteroids as well as low and high doses[5 ] and, therefore, the authors recommended the former due to the potentially-less collateral
effects. Usually, we use 1 ampoule with 4 mg dexamethasone with 5 ml of xylocaine.
Corticosteroid injections are usually performed according to specific parameters.
The injection can be targeted at the anterior flexor crest of the wrist on the ulnar
side of the palmar tendon, an easily-palpable structure. Due to the high risk of nerve
injury, injection between the tendons of the radial long carpal and the long palmar
muscle should be avoided. The angle of insertion of the needle is 45° and it is introduced
about 1 cm in depth. The most common risks of corticosteroid injection are nerve or
tendon injuries. Inadvertent injection of the median nerve causes immediate shock
pain, with the risk of sensory and motor deficits and persistent neuropathic pain.
Use in diabetic patients should be avoided and some patients may experience temporary
worsening of pain for two to three days after the injection. Manual effort should
be avoided for one to two days after the procedure[3 ]. The application can be repeated in one to three months but more than two or three
applications are not recommended owing to the potential adverse effects[3 ].
In seven studies of adequate methodology[6 ],[7 ],[8 ],[9 ],[10 ],[11 ],[12 ],[13 ], Piazzini et al.[11 ] concluded that corticosteroid injection in the carpal tunnel can be considered as
an effective treatment. However, no significant clinical benefit was found for corticosteroid
injections compared with other treatments, including splint immobilization[14 ],[15 ]. In addition, adverse effects such as infection, allergic reaction, osteonecrosis,
tendon rupture, and nerve or tendon injury should be considered[3 ]. Therefore, this treatment has been used as a temporary solution, as the effects
are short term (months) and, as such, it is a good option in transient conditions
that lead to CTS, such as pregnancy or in patients who present with local or systemic
risks for surgery.
Oral supplements and medications
Vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) acts as a coenzyme in numerous enzymatic reactions of lipid,
amino acids and glucose metabolism that are part of the neural function[16 ],[17 ]. Conclusions about the effects of vitamin B6 in CTS patients were established based
on case reports or researches with small numbers of participants. The improvement
observed in some cases was thought to be due to resolution of some previously-undiagnosed
neuropathy or by analgesic action on the painful pathway[17 ]. Despite this fact, some authors still recommend this therapy, based on clinical
response, and the dose usually used is 200 mg/day. The most common adverse effects
are numbness, paraesthesia, and other symptoms related to sensory neuropathy, which
usually disappear upon discontinuation of the supplement[17 ].
Oral diuretics have been used in the treatment of CTS to reduce edema and hence the
tunnels content. Trichlormethiazide, a diuretic with properties similar to those of
hydrochlorothiazide, was preferentially used in some comparative studies but the results
were ineffective in the management of the CTS[4 ],[11 ]. Oral steroids, even at low doses, are more effective than nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs (NSAIDs) and diuretics in the conservative treatment of CTS[11 ]. However, the risk of side effects limits their long-term use[18 ]. Although NSAIDs are not effective, they may be useful in patients with CTS-associated
tendinitis or tenosynovitis to relieve symptoms[4 ],[18 ].
Exercise therapy and mobilization techniques
The rationale for using dynamic exercises as a treatment of CTS is derived from cadaver
and in vivo ultrasound studies showing median nerve and tendon excursions through the carpal
tunnel during the wrist and/or finger movement[19 ],[20 ],[21 ],[22 ]. According to several authors, gliding exercises improve symptoms by preventing,
or stretching, the adhesions among the tendons and median nerve, decreasing tenosynovial
edema, improving venous return and, thus, reducing pressure inside the carpal tunnel[19 ],[20 ],[21 ],[22 ],[23 ],[24 ],[25 ],[26 ],[27 ].
Basically, the exercises involve a sequence of finger movements (for tendon gliding)
and wrist and fingers movements (for median nerve gliding) ([Figures 1 A and B ]). In general, both exercises had been applied concurrently but in some studies,
one of the therapies was adopted as the only task[23 ]. Patients were instructed to practice each exercise, with ten repetitions, three
to five times daily. Each position was sustained for five seconds[23 ].
Figure 1 A) Example of the sequence of finger movements during tendon gliding exercises; B)
Example of the sequence of finger movements during median nerve gliding exercises.
In the last sequence, the thumb is pulled back gently. Adapted from: Akalin E et al.[23 ]
Conflicting results concerning this therapy have been published. According to Huisstede
et al.[3 ], this fact is explained because some studies had poor methodological quality and
evaluated this therapy in association with other managements, such as the combination
of a splint, ultrasound therapy, and tendon and nerve gliding exercises[3 ],[25 ]. Some studies did not show improvement[23 ] and one even showed worsening of the functional status[28 ], According to Ashworth, nerve and tendon gliding exercises were less effective than
splint immobilization in relieving symptoms and improving hand function[4 ]. In the 2012 Cochrane Review, Page et al.[29 ] concluded that there was limited evidence that justified the use of exercise and
mobilization interventions for CTS. However, the authors suggested that consideration
of this therapy should be based on clinician's experience and patient's preference.
Wrist immobilization
Wrist immobilization is the most frequently-adopted conservative therapy for CTS[30 ]. The rationale for splinting was established based on the following: avoiding the
extremes of wrist position reduces the pressure within the carpal tunnel and the neutral
wrist position improves hemodynamic parameters, reducing the edema and minimizing
nerve friction and compression[31 ],[32 ]. Two major types of orthoses used as a fingerless glove are described in the treatment
of carpal tunnel syndrome: the hand brace and wrist splint. The brace, less frequently
used, is made of soft materials without rigid components, unlike the splint[33 ]. The purpose of both devices is the same: to eliminate the range of motion in one
direction. A single study compared the effectiveness of the brace to a splint and
there was no difference between these treatments[33 ].
Wrists splints can be prefabricated or produced by modeling a heated thermoplastic
component on the patient's wrist ([Figure 2 ]). Discontinuation of treatment due to cutaneous intolerance to the splint has been
reported in less than 1% of patients[33 ]. Usually, prefabricated splints contain a volar rod that gives firmness, but may
cause discomfort in some patients. However, in general, both models are well tolerated.
Typically, the splints are manufactured for use in the neutral position but this recommendation
is based on a single randomized controlled trial considered to be of poor quality[3 ],[30 ],[34 ]. Wrists splints usually are used for at least a three-month period[30 ],[33 ] at night-time. According to Huisstede et al.,[29 ] there is no evidence supporting the full-time use of wrist splint compared to a
night-only period.
Figure 2 A custom-made splint manufactured with thermoplastic material.
Despite the prevalence of CTS, the efficacy of different therapeutic modalities, including
wrist immobilization, lacks prospective and well-controlled studies. Although widely
used in clinical practice, the lull effectiveness of the splint has not yet been consistently
demonstrated in systematic reviews. Page et al.[35 ], in a 2012 Cochrane review, found limited evidence for splinting over a short period
versus no treatment or other conservative treatments. However, previous reviews have
shown moderate evidence supporting the use of wrist splints in the treatment of CTS[11 ],[30 ]. Furthermore, as noted by Roll and Hardison, a randomized and controlled trial was
not included in any of these reviews[36 ],[37 ]. A trial by Hall et al. showed that the use of a wrist splint improved symptoms
in CTS patients[37 ]. There was no support for the long-term use of wrist splints in a review by Page
et al.[38 ].
Other conservative treatments
Low-level laser therapy
In general, laser therapy acts by transferring energy, inducing local effects including
increased production of endorphins, serotonin and several mediators reducing the inflammatory
reaction and increasing analgesia[39 ]. Low power lasers have been used in the treatment of CTS, suitable for biostimulating
action. An important detail in the analysis of the treatment is the power density
of the dose, which should be sufficient to cross through the different tissues to
the target organ. The dose generally used is 8–10 J/cm2 with a wavelength ranging from 830–904 nm[39 ].
This low-level laser therapy is applied through a specific probe at different points
(usually three) in the wrist where the median nerve travels superficially[40 ]. The duration of application at each point is 90 seconds[40 ]. The purpose of the treatment is to reduce the inflammatory process and edema, but
some authors have used the laser as a tool to stimulate points used in acupuncture
with the aim of improving associated pain[41 ]. Positive effects of laser on axonal regeneration have been demonstrated in experimental
studies[42 ],[43 ], however it is not yet clear whether the laser energy is sufficient to reach the
median nerve in humans[39 ].
The results with this type of therapy are conflicting and may be explained by the
heterogeneity of factors such as laser font, dose intensity, duration of application,
and different methodologies used to evaluate the results[39 ]. There is still uncertainty whether the structures that are the target of treatment
in humans are, in fact, reached by the transferred energy[39 ]. Thus, evidence of treatment efficacy still needs to be demonstrated and cost-effectiveness
needs to be assessed[11 ],[40 ],[41 ],[42 ],[43 ].
Ultrasound
Therapeutic ultrasound is a physical therapy that uses sound waves administered by
a specific transducer and absorbed by surrounding tissues. The pathophysiological
premise that justifies its use as a therapeutic option in patients with CTS is still
controversial[38 ]. Some authors argue that the effect of ultrasound is secondary to increased local
temperature resulting in increased blood flow rates, metabolism and neural regeneration,
while other researchers claim that the action is due to an anti-inflammatory effect[44 ],[45 ].
Because of the limited number of studies, there are still a number of doubts about
the therapeutic use of ultrasound in CTS, especially with regard to the number and
duration of sessions required. According to the systematic review carried out by Page
et al.[38 ], there is poor quality evidence to recommend therapeutic ultrasound over other conservative
treatments used in CTS, a conclusion also observed in another recent trial[44 ]. No adverse effects have been reported in the reviews by Page et al.[38 ], but only three reports were evaluated.
In conclusion, due to the scarcity of quality evidence in the current literature,
doubts still exist about which conservative treatment is most appropriate for CTS,
especially to treat CTS in the long term. The recommendation should be based on the
intensity of symptoms, severity of the clinical presentation and the patient's preference.
Despite the low level of evidence, corticosteroid injection and wrist immobilization
are the tools to be used preferentially in the conservative treatment of CTS.
