Influence of screw insertion order on compression generated by bone plates in a fracture model

Summary

Present recommendations regarding order of screw insertion for compression plate osteo-synthesis in veterinary training are variable. We hypothesized that placement of a neutrally positioned screw would reduce the magnitude of compression that could be generated by a subsequently placed compression screw. Canine tibial diaphyseal segments were fixed to a plate attached to a bone surrogate and load cell, and the compression generated by screw tightening was measured. Three different screw insertion order patterns were evaluated using both dynamic compression plate (DCP) and limited contact dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP) implants. In group CN, the first screw was placed in compression mode and the second in neutral mode in group NC, the first screw was placed in neutral mode and the second in compression mode in group LNC, the first screw was placed partially tightened in neutral mode and the second in compression mode followed by complete tightening of the neutral screw. Screw insertion order significantly influenced the amount of compression generated with both groups CN and LNC demonstrating significantly greater compression generation when compared with group NC (p <0.0001). Compression generated by group CN constructs was also significantly greater than group LNC (p = 0.0013). Evaluation of group CN data to assess the influence of plate and drill guide combinations on compressive force generated did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference. To maximize compression using a load screw in a bone plate, following securement of the opposite bone fragment to the plate, it should be placed before a neutral screw is placed.

Keywords

Fracture model - screw - bone plate - compression generated

• References

• 1 Perren SM. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84: 1093-1110.
• 2 Brinker WO. Manual of internal fixation in small animals. 2nd revision, enlarged ed. Berlin; New York: Springer; 1998
• 3 Piermattei DL, Flo GL, DeCamp CE. Brinker, Piermattei, and Flo's handbook of small animal orthopedics and fracture repair. 4th ed. St. Louis, MO., USA: Saunders/Elsevier; 2006
• 4 Perren SM, Klaue K, Pohler O. et al The limited contact dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1990; 109: 304-310.
• 5 Helfet DL, Haas NP, Schatzker J. et al AO philosophy and principles of fracture management-its evolution and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85–A [phone].
• 6 Johnson AL, Houlton JEF, Vannini R. AO principles of fracture management in the dog and cat. Davos Platz, Switzerland: AO Pub / (Distribution by Thieme); 2005
• 7 Csiszer AB, Daly CM, Dyce J. et al Comparison of the effects of two screw insertion patterns on bone fragment translocation in a 3.5 mm dynamic compression plate and a 3.5 mm limited-contact dynamic compression plate. Vet Surg 2011 in Press doi: 10.1111/j.1532–950X.2011.00882.x
• 8 Mann FA, Payne JT. Bone healing. Semin Vet Med Surg (Small Anim) 1989; 4: 312-321.
• 9 Kaderly RE. Primary bone healing. Semin Vet Med Surg (Small Anim). 1991; 6: 21-25.
• 10 Shapiro F. Cortical bone repair. The relationship of the lacunar-canalicular system and intercellular gap junctions to the repair process. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988; 70: 1067-1081.