Locking compression plate stabilization of 20 distal radial and ulnar fractures in toy and miniature breed dogs

S. Gibert; G. R. Ragetly; R. J. Boudrieau

doi:10.3415/VCOT-15-02-0042

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Table of Contents

Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2015; 28(06): 441-447
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-15-02-0042

Clinical Communication

Schattauer GmbH

Locking compression plate stabilization of 20 distal radial and ulnar fractures in toy and miniature breed dogs

Authors

S. Gibert

¹Centre Hospitalier Vétérinaire Frégis, Arcueil, France
G. R. Ragetly

¹Centre Hospitalier Vétérinaire Frégis, Arcueil, France
R. J. Boudrieau

²Tufts University Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, North Grafton, MA, USA

Abstract

Summary

Objective: To evaluate retrospectively the effectiveness of the Locking Compression Plate^® (LCP), in the form of either a straight or notched head T-plate, for the treatment of fractures of the distal radius and ulna in a series of 20 toy and miniature breed dogs.

Methods: The medical records of toy and miniature breed dogs (<6 kg), greater than six months of age, with fractures of the distal radius and ulna from two veterinary hospitals were reviewed. The inclusion criteria included: fractures of the distal 1/3 of the radius and ulna and repair with open reduction and internal fixation utilizing an LCP (straight or notched head T-plate).

Results: Twenty fractures (20 dogs) satisfied the inclusion criteria; eight straight and 12 notched head T-plates were used, either 2.0 mm (n = 13) or 2.4 mm (n = 7). Hybrid fixation was performed in all dogs in one or both fragments. Mean time to radiographic union was 6.9 ± 2.5 weeks (range: 4–12 weeks) in 18/20 dogs with radiographic follow-up. One complication was observed: infection that resolved with antibiotic medication and implant removal. No other major complications occurred by the time of last follow-up. In all cases (mean follow-up: 15 ± 7 months), the reported limb function as evaluated by the referring veterinarian or owner was excellent.

Clinical significance: The LCP, used as a hybrid construct for the treatment of distal radial and ulnar fractures was shown to yield excellent clinical results with both uncomplicated healing and excellent functional outcomes in this series of toy and miniature breed dogs.

Keywords

Toy breed - distal radius - dog - locking compression plate - hybrid fixation

Full Text

References

References
1 Brianza SZ, Delise M, Maddalena Ferraris M. et al. Cross-sectional geometrical properties of distal radius and ulna in large, medium and toy breed dogs. J Biomech 2006; 39: 302-311.
2 Egger CE. A technique for the management of radial and ulnar fractures in miniature dogs using transfixation pins. J Small Anim Pract 1990; 31: 337-387.
3 Gambardella PC, Griffiths RC. A technique for repair of oblique fractures of the distal radius in dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1984; 20: 429-433.
4 Haas B, Reichler IM, Montavon PM. Use of the tubular external fixator in the treatment of distal radial and ulnar fractures in small dogs and cats. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003; 3: 132-137.
5 Hamilton MH, Langley Hobbs SJ. Use of the AO veterinary mini ‘T’- plate for stabilisation of distal radius and ulna fractures in toy breed dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2005; 18: 18-25.
6 Lappin MR, Aron DN, Herron HL. Fractures of the radius and ulna in the dog. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1983; 19: 643-650.
7 Larsen LJ, Roush JK, McLaughlin RM. Bone plate fixation of distal radius and ulna fractures in small and miniature-breed dogs. J Am Anim Hosp 1999; 35: 243-250.
8 McCartney W, Kiss K, Robertson I. Treatment of distal radial/ulnar fractures in 17 toy breed dogs. Vet Rec 2010; 166: 430-432.
9 Maclain DL, Braun SG. Fixation of radius and ulna fractures in the immature dog and cat. A review of popular techniques and a report of 8 cases using plate fixation. Vet Surg 1982; 11: 140-145.
10 Piras L, Cappellari F, Peirone B. et al. Treatment of fractures of the distal radius and ulna in toy breed dogs with circular external skeletal fixation: a retrospective study. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24: 228-235.
11 Sumner-Smith G. A comparative investigation into the healing of fractures in miniature poodles and mongrel dogs. J Small Anim Pract 1974; 15: 323-328.
12 Sumner-Smith G. A histological study of fracture nonunion in small dogs. J Small Anim Pract 1974; 15: 571-578.
13 Vaughan LC. A clinical study of non-union fractures in the dog. J Small Anim Pract 1964; 5: 173-177.
14 Waters DJ, Breur GJ, Toombs JP. Treatment of common forelimb fractures in miniature- and toy-breed dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1983; 19: 643-650.
15 Voss K, Kull MA, Haessig M. et al. Repair of longbone fractures in cats and small dogs with the Unilock mandible locking plate system. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 5: 398-405.
16 Hunt JM, Aitken ML, Denny HR. et al. The complications of diaphyseal fractures in dogs: A review of 100 cases. J Small Anim Pract 1980; 21: 103-119.
17 Muir P, Markel MD. Geometric variables and bone mineral density as potential predictors for mechanical properties of the radius of Greyhounds. Am J Vet Res 1996; 57: 1094-1097.
18 Muir P. Distal antebrachial fractures in toy breed dogs. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1997; 19: 137-145.
19 Welch JA, Boudrieau RJ, DeJardin LM. et al. The intraosseous blood supply of the canine radius: Implications for healing of distal fractures in small dogs. Vet Surg 1997; 26: 57-61.
20 Gardner MJ, Helfet DL, Lorich DG. Has locked plating completely replaced conventional plating? (A review). Am J Orthop 2004; 33: 439-446.
21 Perren SM. Backgrounds of the technology of internal fixators. Injury 2003; 34: SB1-SB3.
22 Greiwe RM, Archdeacon MT. Locking plate technology: current concepts. J Knee Surg 2007; 20: 50-55.
23 Wagner M. General principles for the clinical use of the LCP. Injury 2003; 34: B31-42.
24 Doornink J, Fitzpatrick DC, Boldhaus S. et al. Effects of hybrid plating with locked and nonlocked screws on the strength of locked plating constructs in the osteoporotic diaphysis. J Trauma 2010; 69: 411-417.
25 Glasser D, Langlais F. The ISOLS radiological implants evaluation system.. In: Langlais F, Tomeno B.. editors. Limb Salvage: Major Reconstructions in Oncologic and Nontumoral Conditions Berlin, Germany: Springer; 1991: xxiii-xxxi.
26 Johnson AL. Fundamentals of orthopedic surgery and fracture management.. In: Fossum TH.. editor. Small Animal Surgery St Louis, Missouri: Elsevier-Saunders; 2013: 1033-1105.
27 Stoffel K, Dieter U, Stachowiak G. et al. Biomechanical testing of LCP - how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled?. Injury 2003; 34: B11-B19.
28 Staller GS, Richardson DW, Nunamaker DM. et al. Contact area and static pressure profile at the bone-plate interface in the non-luted and luted bone plate. Vet Surg 1995; 24: 299-307.
29 Koch D. Screws and plate.. In: Johnson AL, Houlton JEF, Vannini R.. editors. AO Principles of Fracture Management in the Dog and Cat Dübendorf, Switzerland: Georg Thieme Verlag AO Publishing; 2005: 27-51.
30 Thompson AM, Bergh MS, Wang C. et al. Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy implant removal: a retrospective analysis of 129 cases. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24: 450-456.
31 Savicky R, Beale B, Murtaugh R. et al. Outcome following removal of TPLO implants with surgical site infection. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26: 260-265.
32 Field JR. Bone plate fixation: its relationship with implant induced osteoporosis. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1997; 10: 34-40.
33 Baltzer WI, Cooley S, Warnock JJ. et al. Augmentation of diaphyseal fractures of the radius and ulna in toy breed dogs using a free autogenous omental graft and bone plating. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2015; 28: 131-139.
34 Piermattei DL, Flo GL, DeCamp CE. Fractures: classification, diagnosis, and treatment. In: Brinker, Piermattei, and Flo’s Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Repair.. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2006: 25-159.

Supplementary Material

Online Supplementary Material (PDF) (PDF)