The influence of aluminium, steel and polyurethane shoeing systems and of the unshod hoof on the injury risk of a horse kick

Summary

Objectives: To evaluate the damage inflicted by an unshod hoof and by the various horseshoe materials (steel, aluminium and polyurethane) on the long bones of horses after a simulated kick.

Methods: Sixty-four equine radii and tibiae were evaluated using a drop impact test setup. An impactor with a steel, aluminium, polyurethane, or hoof horn head was dropped onto prepared bones. An impactor velocity of 8 m/s was initially used with all four materials and then testing was repeated with a velocity of 12 m/s with the polyurethane and hoof horn heads. The impact process was analysed using a high-speed camera, and physical parameters, including peak contact force and impact duration, were calculated.

Results: At 8 m/s, the probability of a fracture was 75% for steel and 81% for aluminium, whereas polyurethane and hoof horn did not damage the bones. At 12 m/s, the probability of a fracture was 25% for polyurethane and 12.5% for hoof horn. The peak contact force and impact duration differed significantly between ‘hard materials’ (aluminium and steel) and ‘soft materials’ (polyurethane and hoof horn).

Clinical significance: The observed bone injuries were similar to those seen in analogous experimental studies carried out previously and comparable to clinical fracture cases suggesting that the simulated kick was realistic. The probability of fracture was significantly higher for steel and aluminium than for polyurethane and hoof horn, which suggests that the horseshoe material has a significant influence on the risk of injury for humans or horses kicked by a horse.

Supplementary Material for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-17-01-0003

ORCID iD MAJ: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2142-2942

Keywords

Horses - shoeing - impact load - kick injury

• References

• 1 Currey JD. How well are bones designed to resist fracture?. J Bone Miner Res 2003; 18: 591-598.
• 2 Currey JD. Bone architecture and fracture. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2005; 3: 52-56.
• 3 Kramer M, Burow K, Heger A. Fracture mechanism of lower legs under impact load. SAE Technical Paper 1973 February 1; Paper Number 73. 1966 doi:10.4271/730966 Available at http://papers.sae.org/730966/
• 4 Derungs S, Fürst A, Hässig M. et al. Frequency, consequences and clinical outcome of kick injuries in horses: 256 cases 1992-2000. Wien Tierarztl Monatsschr 2004; 91: 114-119.
• 5 Exadaktylos A, Eggli S, Inden P. et al. Hoof kick injuries in unmounted equestrians. Improving accident analysis and prevention by introducing an accident and emergency based relational database. Emerg Med J 2002; 19: 573-575.
• 6 Derungs S, Füerst A, Haas C. et al. Fissure fractures of the radius and tibia in 23 horses: a retrospective study. Equine Vet Educ 2001; 13: 313-318.
• 7 Sanders-Shamis M, Bramlage L, Gable A. Radius fractures in the horse: a retrospective study of 47 cases. Equine Vet J 1986; 18: 432-437.
• 8 Keiper R, Receveur H. Social interactions of free-ranging Przewalski horses in semi-reserves in the Netherlands. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1992; 33: 303-318.
• 9 Bachmann I, Stauffacher M. Prävalenz von Verhaltensstörungen in der Schweizer Pferdepopulation [Prevalence of behavioural disorders in the Swiss horse population]. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd 2002; 144: 356-368.
• 10 Mischler S, Hofmann M. Wear of polymer horseshoes: a field investigation. Wear 2003; 255: 1300-1305.
• 11 Back W, van Schie MH, Pol JN. Synthetic shoes attenuate hoof impact in the trotting warmblood horse. Equine Comp Exerc Physiol 2006; 3: 143-151.
• 12 Pardoe C, McGuigan M, Rogers K. et al. The effect of shoe material on the kinetics and kinematics of foot slip at impact on concrete. Equine Vet J 2001; 33: 70-73.
• 13 Piskoty G, Jäggin S, Michel S. et al. Resistance of equine tibiae and radii to side impact loads. Equine Vet J 2012; 44: 714-720.
• 14 Fürst A, Oswald S, Jaggin S. et al. Fracture configurations of the equine radius and tibia after a simulated kick. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21: 49-58.
• 15 Ernst R, Dual J. Acoustic emission localization in beams based on time reversed dispersion. Ultrasonics 2014; 54: 1522-1533.
• 16 Schweizer A. Formelsammlung und Berechnungsprogramme für Anlagenbau [homepage on internet]. 2007 April 25 [cited on 2016 December 31]. Available from http://www.schweizer-fn.de/festig keit/festigkeitswerte/stahl/stahl_start.php.
• 17 Kulin RM, Jiang F, Vecchio KS. Effects of age and loading rate on equine cortical bone failure. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2011 4. 57-75.
• 18 Shazly M, Kayacan R, Prakash V. et al. Failure of equine compact bone under impact loading. Proceedings of the 11^thInternational Conference on Fracture, ICF11. Turin, Italy: 2005. March 20-25. 464-466.
• 19 Evans G, Behiri J, Vaughan L. et al. The response of equine cortical bone to loading at strain rates experienced in vivo by the galloping horse. Equine Vet J 1992; 24: 125-128.
• 20 Michel S, Piskoty G, Schmidlin A. et al. Bending and torsional stiffness measurements of equine radii and tibiae. Pferdeheilkunde 2014; 30: 577-584.
• 21 Nikolié V, Han[ccaron] evié J, Hudec M. et al. Absorption of the impact energy in the palmar soft tissues. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1975; 148: 215-221.
• 22 Robinovitch SN, McMahon TA, Hayes WC. Force attenuation in trochanteric soft tissues during impact from a fall. J Orthop Res 1995; 13: 956-962.
• 23 Bouxsein ML, Szulc P, Munoz F. et al. Contribution of trochanteric soft tissues to fall force estimates, the factor of risk, and prediction of hip fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res 2007; 22: 825-831.
• 24 Currey J. The effect of protection on the impact strength of rabbits’ bones. Cells Tissues Organs 1968; 71: 87-93.
• 25 Sedlin ED, Hirsch C. Factors affecting the determination of the physical properties of femoral cortical bone. Acta Orthop Scand 1966; 37: 29-48.
• 26 Pelker RR, Friedlaender GE, Markham TC. et al. Effects of freezing and freeze-drying on the biomechanical properties of rat bone. J Orthop Res 1983; 1: 405-411.
• 27 Panjabi MM, Krag M, Summers D. et al. Biomechanical time-tolerance of fresh cadaveric human spine specimens. J Orthop Res 1985; 3: 292-300.
• 28 Andrade MGS, Sá CN, Marchionni AMT. et al. Effects of freezing on bone histological morphology. Cell Tissue Bank 2008; 9: 279-287.
• 29 Linde F, Sørensen HC. The effect of different storage methods on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone. J Biomech 1993; 26: 1249-1252.
• 30 Ernst R, Dual J. Quantitative guided wave testing by applying the time reversal principle on dispersive waves in beams. Wave Motion 2015; 58: 259-280.
• 31 Amsler Frey AG. PUR Polyurethan: Technisches Datenblatt [File on internet]. August 1. 2016 Available at https://shop.amsler-frey.ch/down-loads/datenblaetter/td_pur.pdf