Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.303ceu
JAAA CEU Program
Volume 30, Number 3 (March 2019)Publication History
Publication Date:
26 May 2020 (online)
Questions refer to Dwyer et al, “Contralateral Routing of Signal Yields Significant Speech in Noise Benefit for Unilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients,” 235–242.
Learner Outcomes:
Readers of this article should be able to:
-
Summarize the impact of CROS on speech understating in cochlear implant listeners when speech originates from various azimuths.
-
Identify how the magnitude of the head or face shadow might serve as a clinical tool in this population of patients.
CEU Questions:
-
After receiving a second implant, appreciable benefit is largely due to:
-
summation effects
-
overcoming the head shadow effect
-
binaural squelch (or binaural unmasking of speech)
-
-
In unilateral CI recipients, it is generally agreed upon that CROS overcomes the negative effects of the head shadow by:
-
increasing the effective SNR when the signal of interest originates from the side of the poorer hearing ear.
-
increasing the effective SNR when the signal of interest originates from the side of the better hearing ear.
-
increasing the effective SNR when the signal of interest originates from the front of the listener.
-
-
Which statement best reflects CROS outcomes in the current literature?
-
CROS is detrimental to speech understanding when noise is presented to the CI ear.
-
CROS improves speech recognition in quiet for unilateral listeners.
-
CROS benefit has been mixed.
-
-
In this study, speech recognition testing was completed:
-
immediately after CROS fitting.
-
after two weeks chronic use.
-
with AzBio sentence materials via monitored live-voice.
-
-
In this study, questionnaires of subjective benefit were administered:
-
immediately after CROS fitting
-
immediately before CROS evaluation, and after two weeks CROS use
-
with the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB)
-
-
The only listening condition that demonstrated statistically significant improvement with the addition of the CROS device was:
-
speech recognition in noise with the signal presented to the CI ear.
-
speech recognition in noise with the signal presented to the poorer ear.
-
speech recognition in noise with the signal presented to the front of the listener.
-
-
The difference in an individual’s ability to recognize speech when it is presented to the front of the listener vs. when it is presented to the CI side is called:
-
the head shadow effect
-
CROS benefit
-
the face shadow effect
-
-
The difference in an individual’s ability to recognize speech when it is presented to the listener’s CI side vs. when it is presented to the poorer hearing ear is called:
-
CROS benefit
-
the head shadow effect
-
the face shadow effect
-
-
Which of the following was not observed?
-
A significant correlation between the magnitude of the head shadow and CROS benefit for quiet speech (50 dBA) and speech in noise.
-
A significant correlation between the magnitude of the face shadow and CROS benefit for quiet speech (50 dBA) and speech in noise.
-
A significant correlation between the magnitude of the head shadow and CROS benefit for conversational level speech (65 dBA).
-
-
With the addition of the CROS device, participants reported significant improvement in which domain of the SSQ12 questionnaire?
-
speech hearing
-
spatial hearing
-
qualities of hearing
-
#
No conflict of interest has been declared by the author(s).