Introduction
The Covid-19 pandemic does not require any formal introduction. We are going through
a unique situation wherein the health-care system is at an unprecedented risk. In
times of war and natural calamities such as earthquakes and floods, health-care workers
continue to do their job, but the irony here is health-care workers themselves are
at risk. This pandemic has created a challenge of epic proportions regarding the management
of one of the most vulnerable groups of patients who have cancer. We are dealing with
an overburdened health-care system, reduced availability of resources, and health-care
personnel. The question that arises here is “Who bells the cat?” With this rapidly
growing pandemic, it is understood that risk–benefit ratios of formerly well-established
interventions will change drastically.
Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is one of the most common malignancies in North India. In
the Delhi Cancer Registry, it is the third-most common cancer in females. The majority
of patients present in an advanced stage and the disease carries a dismal prognosis:
the median survival is around 6 months, and 5-year survival was reported to be <5%.[1], [2] The limited benefit of aggressive treatments needs to be rebalanced in the scenario
of the ongoing pandemic. A small study suggested that cancer patients with Covid-19
infection undergoing active treatment have a higher morbidity and mortality.[3] Further, frequent hospital visits for intravenous (IV) chemotherapy/radiotherapy
are expected to overburden an already-burdened health-care system and expose patients
to hospital-acquired Covid-19 infection. The members of the Science and Cost Cancer
Consortium, New Delhi, have therefore formulated guidelines in these difficult times.
The intent of these guidelines is to find a best middle ground for the benefit of
patients, their families, their oncologists, and the health system. The guidelines
are aimed to effectively use the existing infrastructure, maximally prevent the Covid-19
infection and its complications by using easily manageable chemotherapy, and reduce
hospital visits as far as possible. It is emphasized that these guidelines are for
use during the ongoing pandemic only. Due to the absence of specific data in a pandemic
setting, the level of evidence for these recommendations is C (Expert consensus).
Palliative Setting
For patients with metastatic GBC, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall
survival (OS) are dismal as shown in a recent randomized trial reported by Sharma
et al. The median PFS was 4–5 months and the median OS was 8.3–9 months.[4] These experiences are comparable to findings in other studies of gemcitabine-platinum.[5], [6] These regimens require at least two hospital/day-care visits per cycle. The toxicity
is not insignificant, and more than 50% of patients had Grade III or higher toxicity
in both arms of the above study.[4] Most of these patients will require additional hospital or emergency room visits,
and at least 10%–20% will likely need inpatient admission. These factors make these
regimens unsuitable in the current pandemic scenario. Capecitabine-oxaliplatin has
been noted to be slightly better in these respects, although the same concerns remain.[7]
Oral single-agent capecitabine is a relatively nontoxic treatment that requires very
few hospital visits and can be taken by the patient at home in an isolated setting.
In a small retrospective study (n = 8), 50% of patients with advanced GBC achieved a response; the median PFS was 6.5
months and the median OS was 9.9 months.[8] Although the dataset is very small, this activity is encouraging and comparable
to that of the previously mentioned complex and more toxic regimens.
Mostly, patients with a good performance status (PS) of 0 and 1 were included in most
clinical trials of metastatic GBC; the efficacy of these regimens in those with poor
PS of 2–4 is not known and is likely detrimental as we have seen in other solid tumors.
In the current pandemic situation, evidence-based guidelines must be practiced and
best supportive care alone should be offered to patients with ECOG PS 2, 3, and 4.
Adjuvant Setting
For patients with operated GBC who require adjuvant chemotherapy, the American Society
of Clinical Oncology recommends 6 months of oral capecitabine, with an option of chemoradiotherapy
for patients with positive margins.[9] In the BILCAP trial, capecitabine was compared with observation and found effective
only in per-protocol analysis for biliary tract cancers (78 patients had GBC).[10] Other two randomized trials of gemcitabine-oxaliplatin and gemcitabine failed to
show benefit in PRODIGE-12 and BCAT trials, respectively.[11], [12] The option of chemoradiation is based on limited data, and the actual benefit over
chemotherapy alone is not known. In view of the need for daily hospital visits for
radiation and higher toxicity, we do not recommend chemoradiation during the ongoing
pandemic.
Palliative Care and Pain Control
Palliative Care and Pain Control
It is understood that the continuum of care remains intact during patients' treatment,
and the patients do not feel “abandoned” due to the use of an oral regimen and less
frequent hospital visits. Adequate pain relief with analgesics, management of toxicities,
and care of nutritional requirements is a part of treatment. The World Health Organization
ladder may be used to optimize pain control. It is suggested that majority of encounters
are carried out via telemedicine as per Government of India guidelines.
Management of Covid-19 Infection during Treatment
Management of Covid-19 Infection during Treatment
Patients who are found to be infected with Covid-19 during treatment should have their
anticancer treatment interrupted, admitted in appropriate isolation units, and treated
as per the current Indian guidelines.[13]
Conclusion
The adjuvant treatment of GBC during the current pandemic should focus on switching
from IV to oral chemotherapy and intensively managing patients with cancer with active
Covid-19 infection. The aim is to balance the risk and benefit to the patients, their
families, and health-care workers, while putting minimum possible strain on the health
system.
The algorithm depicted in [Figure 1] may help in decision-making for managing patients. These are recommendations only,
and individual decisions as per clinical condition of the patient may be considered,
in discussion with the patient according to the principles of shared decision-making.{[Figure 1]}
Figure 1: Algorithm–Management of gallbladder cancer during COVID-19 pandemic
