KEY WORDS
Adipofascial flap - adipofascial perforator flap - lower leg soft-tissue defect -
perforator flap - turnover flap
INTRODUCTION
The surgical planning for the lower-limb soft-tissue defects has changed significantly
with the improvement in microvascular surgical concepts. Free tissue transfer provides
adequate coverage; however, contour defect at the recipient and donor site remains
a significant problem. Furthermore, acquiring technical expertise and proper instrumentation
are limitations for lesser use of this option. Therefore, local flaps still remain
workhorse for coverage of soft-tissue defects of the lower leg.
Adipofascial tissue is well defined in the leg as compared to other areas of the body.
They are composed of subcutaneous fat and deep fascia with reliable blood supply.
Surgical plane in the leg is deep to the deep fascia.[[1]] Adipofascial tissue without skin elements increases its adaptability and pliability
for swift manipulation to cover soft-tissue defect of the leg.
In the early 1990s, adipofascial turnover and local transposition flaps gained some
popularity with the work of Lin et al., but the past years had not seen much work on this potentially usable tissue.[[2]
[3]] Using Doppler, adipofascial tissue based on perforator can be easily raised in
the lower limb sparing its major neurovascular structures.[[4]] With this modification, we have evaluated the use of adipofascial perforator flap
for covering small-to-medium-sized soft-tissue defect in the lower limb.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
This is a prospective observational study. Patients of age >18 years with clinically
small-to-medium-sized post-traumatic soft-tissue defect of the leg requiring flap
cover were included in the study. Patients with systemic illnesses such as uncontrolled
diabetes mellitus, atherosclerosis and peripheral vascular diseases were excluded
from the study. Soft-tissue defect of 21 patients was reconstructed using perforator-based
adipofascial flap between January 2012 and November 2013. Due permission was taken
from institutional research and ethical committee. Written informed consent was taken
from the patients.
Pre-operative localisation of the perforators was done using handheld Doppler probe
of 8 MHz along the axis of anterior tibial artery, posterior tibial artery and peroneal
artery. Flap was planned on the nearest best-marked perforator as a pivot point. Previous
traumatic scars, surgical scars and external fixator applied were taken into consideration
while planning. The flap design was adjusted as per intraoperative location of the
better adjacent perforator, i.e., bigger size or pulsating perforator was given preference
over smaller non-pulsating perforator.
Patients were operated under regional anaesthesia. Dissection was done under 3.5×
−4.5× loupe magnification. Tourniquet applied was inflated without exsanguination
of the limb. It facilitates intraoperative identification of perforators as they remain
filled with blood. Skin flaps were raised as planned just deep to dermis sparing only
minimal adipose tissue with the skin flaps. Taking too much areolar tissue with the
skin flap decreases the thickness of the adipofascial tissue to be raised as flap.
Adipofascial tissue was exposed, and planned flap was duplicated over it using template
considering the size of soft-tissue defect. One margin of flap was incised, and adipofascial
tissue was raised in subfascial plane for localisation the perforator. Once a suitable
perforator was found, dimensions of flap were confirmed or changed to the extent as
required. Other margins of adipofascial flap were incised so as to island it on selected
perforators. All fascial attachments around the perforator were released, and dissection
around the perforator in intermuscular or intramuscular plane was done to gain additional
length. After deflating tourniquet with the flap in its native position, haemostasis
was achieved and viability of flap evaluated. Finally, the flap was transposed into
the defect. Pivot point of perforator was rechecked to avoid kinking. In adipofascial
perforator flap, a small adipofascial tissue can be raised distal to the perforator.
In our cases, we have used this smaller blade either to cover the pedicle or fill
the defect to improve the contour deformity. After insetting over the defect, the
adipofascial flap was covered with split-thickness skin graft, and the donor area
was closed primarily.
Post-operatively, the flap was monitored by colour of ooze of blood on needle prick
from the fenestrations made in the skin graft. Patients were followed till healing
of the wound, and at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months to assess the functional and aesthetic
outcome in terms of adequate healing of the wound, any functional limitations imposed
by harvesting flap, sensory abnormalities and contour deformities of the donor site.
RESULTS
Of 21 patients included in the study, 19 were male and 2 were female. The youngest
patient in the cohort was 19 years and the oldest patient was 60 years of age. Aetiology
and location of soft-tissue defect in the lower limb are shown in [Table 1]. The size of soft-tissue defect ranged from 2 cm × 3 cm to 9 cm × 4.5 cm in the
greatest dimension.
Table 1
Aetiology and location of the leg defect
|
Total number of patients: 21
|
|
Aetiology of leg defect
|
|
|
Post-traumatic
|
16
|
|
Post-infective
|
2
|
|
Post-burn
|
2
|
|
Dehiscence after orthopaedic intervention
|
1
|
|
Location of defect
|
|
|
Middle one-third of the leg
|
8
|
|
Lower one-third of the leg
|
4
|
|
Medial malleolus
|
5
|
|
Lateral malleolus
|
4
|
In our study, posterior tibial artery perforators were most commonly used for elevating
flaps. Anterior tibial artery perforator-based flap was used in two patients [[Table 2]]. There was congestion of the flap in six patients in the early post-operative period.
Vascularity of one flap improved after removing hematoma underneath. In other five
cases, the holding sutures at the margins of the flap and of the skin bridge segment
were opened up. Congestion improved but there was partial flap loss. In four patients,
after debridement and dressing, split-skin grafting was done when healthy granulation
tissue was formed. One patient required local transposition flap to cover the exposed
tendon. Partial loss of split-skin graft over the adipofascial flap occurred in two
patients who healed with regular dressings. Regarding the functional outcome, of the
five patients who were having fractured tibia, four healed satisfactorily while one
patient developed osteomyelitis who was lost in follow-up. These findings were confirmed
on X-ray and clinical examination by concerned orthopaedic surgeon. We subjectively
evaluated aesthetic appearance of donor site by the patient and resident doctor separately
as per visual analogue scale (VAS) (0–10). The average patient's score was 8.24 and
average doctor's score was 7.95, but the difference between the average patient's
and doctor's VAS value was statistical insignificant (one-tailed test, P = 0.09232).
Table 2
Location of zone of perforator used for harvesting adipofascial flap
|
PTAP adipofascial flap
|
PAP adipofascial flap
|
ATAP adipofascial flap
|
|
Location of perforator (cm)
|
Number of patient
|
Location of perforator (cm)
|
Number of patient
|
Location of perforator (cm)
|
Number of patient
|
|
Distances are from lower reference points: Tip of malleoli and mid-malleolar point.
PTAP: Posterior tibial artery perforator, PAP: Peroneal artery perforator, ATAP: Anterior
tibial artery perforator
|
|
4-6
|
4
|
8-10
|
2
|
5.5
|
1
|
|
6-8
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
8-10
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-12
|
1
|
12-14
|
2
|
21
|
1
|
|
12-14
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
14-16
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
15
|
|
4
|
|
2
|
Case 1
A 42-year-old male presented with a 9 cm × 4.5 cm wound over lateral malleolus. An
18 cm × 5 cm adipofascial flap based on a perforator 12.5 cm above the lateral malleolus
was raised and transposed to cover the defect [[Figure 1]].
Figure 1: (a) Patient with soft-tissue defect over lateral malleolus of the right leg. (b)
Adipofascial flap based on peroneal artery perforator. (c) Adipofascial flap easily
countered to cover the defect. (d) Follow-up image after 1 month showing adequate
healing
Case 2
A 42-year-old patient came with a 3 cm × 4 cm post-traumatic wound over the medial
malleolus of the right leg 25 days after a road traffic accident. A 25 cm × 4.5 cm
adipofascial flap based on posterior tibial artery perforator located 9 cm from the
medial malleolus was harvested for wound coverage [[Figure 2]].
Figure 2: (a) Image showing the right limb of patient with soft-tissue defect over medial malleolus
and planned flap of 20 cm × 4.5 cm in size. (b) Flap size readjusted to 25 cm × 4.5
cm as per intraoperative location of perforator. (c) Adipofascial flap raised on posterior
tibial artery perforator. (d) Image showing 180° rotation of adipofascial flap to
cover medial malleolus defect. (e) Insetting of the adipofascial flap. (f) Adipofascial
tissue covered with split-skin graft. (g) Follow-up after 3 weeks showing adequate
healing of donor and recipient site
Case 3
A 48-year-old male presented with post-infective wound in the middle one-third of
leg, 3 cm × 4 cm in size. An 11 cm × 4 cm anterior tibial artery perforator-based
adipofascial flap cover was done. Both the blades of the flap were used to fill the
defect. There were no post-operative complications [[Figure 3]].
Figure 3: (a) Left lower-limb soft-tissue defect of patient's tibia covered with scab and granulation
tissue. (b) Adipofascial flap raised on anterior tibial artery perforator. (c) Both
leaves of the flap are used to fill the defect. (d) Adipofascial flap covered with
split-skin graft and donor-site primarily closed. (e) Follow-up after
DISCUSSION
Soft-tissue reconstruction of the leg should be durable, aesthetically acceptable
and with minimal donor-site morbidity. The operative procedure should also be technically
easy. Adipofascial tissue of the leg raised as perforator flap can have wide applications
to provide durable cover for soft-tissue defect of the leg and minimal donor-site
morbidity.
Providing ideal soft-tissue coverage is strenuous work for reconstructive surgeons
which has led to continuous refinement of surgical options and evolution of new techniques.
Microvascular tissue transfer is suitable option for large and complicated leg defects,
but they still are not suitable for small-to-medium-sized defects, especially around
medial malleolus and lateral malleolus. Furthermore, some patients are not suitable
candidates for free tissue transfer because of existing comorbidities, and proper
instrumentation with adequate microsurgical skills is prerequisites for it. The rationale
behind the fasciocutaneous flap is robust blood supply of the deep fascia. Bulkiness
at the recipient site, donor-site disfigurement, limitation in reach and mobility
of the bulky flap are the major limitations. Oedema, inflammation and scar in the
surrounding area of the defect preclude the use of local fasciocutaneous flaps. Local
muscle and musculocutaneous flaps are reliable option for coverage but are associated
with significant donor-site deformity and may cause functional deficits. Furthermore,
they are less pliable which limits their reach and rotational capacity.
We have evaluated adipofascial perforator flap for its feasibility to cover small-to-medium-sized
soft-tissue defect of the leg, its outcomes in terms of flap complications, functional
outcome and aesthetic donor-site appearance.
Adipofascial perforator flap leaves minimal scar and no major sensory disturbances
at the donor site. Unlike fasciocutaneous flaps, adipofascial tissue is truly plastic
in nature because it can be easily moulded and contoured according to the size and
depth of defect [[Figure 1]].
There was no report of flap necrosis or venous congestion when Lin et al. used distally based adipofascial turned down and transposition flap from medial
side of the leg to cover soft-tissue defect over the tibia in five patients.[[2]] Distally-based medial, lateral and superficial sural artery-based adipofascial
flap was used to cover medial and lateral malleolar soft-tissue defect in 12 patients,
and all flaps were reported to survive well.[[5]] The author reported flap tip necrosis in one of 12 patients when distally based
medial adipofascial flap was used to cover soft-tissue defect in the lower half of
the leg. Complete loss of flap was not a complication in our patients also. In our
cohort, there was partial loss of flap in five patients due to venous congestion.
One drawback of all adipofascial flaps is venous congestion. Veins are more prone
to torsion than arteries. The congestion can be temporary with stabilisation of flow
after some time. This may lead to necrosis of tip or loss of superficial tissue. True
insufficiency resulting in necrosis can occur in few cases. Worsening congestion may
require derotation of the flap or venous supercharging.[[6]]
On thorough search of literature, we could not find safe size of adipofascial tissue
that can be raised as flap. In our study, we have successfully used 25 cm × 4.5 cm
posterior tibial artery perforator-based adipofascial flap for coverage of medial
malleolus defect [[Figure 2]].
Commonly, authors have previously used only distally based lateral, medial and superficial
sural artery-based adipofascial tissue for soft-tissue coverage.[[3]
[7]
[8]] Chung et al. reported use of lateral calcaneal artery adipofascial flap for coverage of posterior
heel defect.[[6]] Adipofascial tissue of the anterior compartment is difficult to raise because of
paucity and variable location of perforators. Using Doppler localisation of perforator,
we have utilised the anterior compartment adipofascial flap for soft-tissue coverage
over tibia [[Figure 3]] and medial malleolus. Anterior compartment tissue provides valuable tissue for
reconstruction when other options are not available for soft-tissue defect coverage.
The adipofascial flap provides suitable vascular tissue for fracture site healing
or salvage of the exposed bone. When adipofascial tissue is transposed over the defect,
the well-vascularised fascial tissue covers the exposed bone. In our study using adipofascial
flap, four of the five patients who were having fractured tibia healed satisfactorily.
Apart from aesthetics and stability, important issue which should be addressed while
reconstructing defect around malleolus and lower third of the leg is ease of using
foot wears,[[4]] clothing and socks. Use of slender adipofascial tissue for coverage has merit over
other options such as fasciocutaneous flap, muscle and myocutaneous flap in this regard.
In our patients, scar over the flap was satisfactorily stable, and no patient complained
of recurrent ulceration or breakdown of wound in 6-month follow-up.
Adipofascial flap can be elevated with two blades, one superior and a small inferior.
Both can be used to augment tissue bulk over the defect, if carefully planned [[Figure 3]]. Otherwise, the second inferior leaf of the flap can be used to cover the pedicle,
just below the skin. Other merit of adipofascial flap is that the degree of freedom
of rotation is more. This property gives an edge and should be considered to cover
defects over difficult areas such as tendo-achilles and when surrounding adjacent
area is scarred. In our case, there was partial loss of split-skin graft over the
flap in two cases. Both the cases healed satisfactorily with repeated dressing changes.
Cosmetic disfigurement is the major disadvantage of using fasciocutaneous flap, muscle
flap or free flap. When adipofascial flap is planned, primary closure of the donor
site is possible after harvesting adipofascial tissue. Most studies have confirmed
the superior donor-site outcome following use of adipofascial flaps [[Figure 3]]. In our study, there was no significant sensory loss/hyperesthesia in the skin
over the donor area except in two cases who reported small anaesthetic patch over
the skin flap suture line where flap of 18 cm × 5 cm and 22 cm × 6 cm size was harvested.
Both patients recovered completely over a follow-up period of 6 months. Two patients
had necrosis at donor skin flaps margin which healed by repeated dressings. Despite
several merits, there are few limitations of using this flap also. It cannot be used
for large soft-tissue defects, and prior Doppler localisation of perforator is mandatory.
Local fasciocutaneous flap cannot be used as salvage procedure since skin flaps are
already raised subdermally at initially steps. Post-operatively, monitoring flap viability
is confounded by the presence of split-skin graft over the flap. These points should
be strictly considered before planning adipofascial perforator flap.
CONCLUSIONS
Adipofascial tissue of the leg provides substantial soft tissue to cover the lower
leg defects. Perforator localisation using Doppler increases the reliability of using
large adipofascial tissue as flap. Furthermore, adipofascial tissue based on the perforator
of anterior tibial artery can be easily harvested. Thickness of the flap may be modulated
by incorporating tissues inferior and superior to the perforator and using two leaves
of fascia. This is a novel technique which has not been described in the literature
previously. Pliability of the adipofascial tissue confers the ability for easy moulding,
increases its reach and degree of freedom which helps to reconstruct difficult soft-tissue
defects particularly around malleolus and lower third of the leg. Finally, the use
of adipofascial tissue results in minimal donor-site morbidity and aesthetically superior
recipient site scar.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms.
In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their
images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients
understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will
be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
