Key words
Duodenal ulcer perforation - endoclip - upper endoscopy
Introduction
Duodenal ulcer perforation (DUP) is a common surgical emergency.[1] The classic, pedicled omental patch that is performed for the “plugging” of these
perforations was first described by Cellan-Jones in 1929.[2] Although it is commonly attributed to Graham, who described the use of a free graft
of the omentum to repair the perforation in 1937.[3] We report a case series of carefully selected patients treated successfully with
endoscopic clipping which precludes laparotomy or laparoscopy which needs general
anesthesia. It offers the advantages of a natural orifice approach.
Materials and Methods
Three young male patients with age ranging between 22 and 27 years were taken up for
the treatment of DUP with endoclips. All the three patients presented with acute upper
abdominal pain with vomiting of 4-6 h duration. The diagnosis of peptic ulcer perforation
was made by clinical history and chest x-ray revealing free pneumoperitoneum [Figure 1]. All of them were hemodynamically stable with near normal blood pressure and pulse
rate. All three underwent sonography of the abdomen which showed minimal free fluid
in the Morrison's pouch. Complete hemogram, renal function tests, blood group, and
cross matching, were done for all patients in anticipation of surgery under general
anesthesia if clipping fails. All the three patients were explained the new concept
of clipping for DUP by endoclips. The need for formal laparotomy if required either
immediately or later was explained. Written informed consent was obtained. An abdominal
drain was passed from the right side under local anesthesia before the patient underwent
upper endoscopy to allow the air to come out from the greater sac as a result of inflation
of air while endoscopy and clipping was done. The endoscopy was done under local anesthesia
spray and sedation. The DUP was identified and perforation was confirmatively seen
on the anterior wall of duodenum [Figure 2]. The perforation was clipped by two clips in two patients [Figure 3] and [Figure 4] and three clips in one patient. Supportive treatment included nasogastric aspirations,
IV fluids, proton pump inhibitors, and antibiotics. At the end of 5 days, methylene
blue was given through the nasogastric tube. No bluish discoloration was seen in the
drain in any patient. On the 6th day, the patient was started on clear liquids orally.
Bowel movements were ensured clinically and by auscultation. On the 7th day, soft
diet was started. The drain was removed subsequently. All patients showed uneventful
recovery. At the end of 6 weeks, all underwent upper endoscopy which revealed healed
ulcer with no clips.
Figure 1: Chest radiograph suggestive of free gas under both domes of diaphragm
Figure 2: Endoscopic view of duodenal ulcer perforation
Figure 3: Endoscopic view of one clip applied on duodenal perforation
Figure 4: Endoscopic view of two clips applied on duodenal perforation
Discussion
DUP is a common surgical emergency.[1] It has good prognosis with timely and appropriate intervention. The gold standard
for treatment of iatrogenic duodenal perforation is a surgical repair.[4],[5],[6] A recent trend is toward the use of minimally invasive approach. In some cases,
conservative medical management may be used for small perforations associated with
unconfirmed or small leaks.[4],[5],[6] The latest alternative to surgical or medical management of iatrogenic perforation
is the endoscopic clipping device. On thorough review of literature, we found few
articles stating successful endoscopic clipping of duodenal perforations which were
iatrogenic in nature. Our case series appears to be one of the few studies reporting
endoscopic clipping of spontaneous DUP.
In 1993, endoclips were used for the first time to close an iatrogenic perforation
secondary to resection of gastric leiomyoma.[7] Kaneko and colleagues [8] have used endoclips to treat duodenal perforation secondary to therapeutic endoscopy.
Furthermore, cases reported by Sebastian et al.,[9] and others have demonstrated successful closure of an iatrogenic duodenal perforation
with an endoscopic clipping device following EUS examination.[8],[9] No complications were reported in these case reports. Complete healing of the perforation
site was observed by a 1-month follow-up endoscopy, and the clips were observed to
dislodge spontaneously within 3 weeks of placement.[10]
A similar study by Goenka et al.[11] reports the successful use of over-the-scope clips for the closure of GI leaks and
fistulas in six patients out of which three were inflammatory in origin. The site
of lesion varied including lower esophagus, gastric body, and splenic flexure. The
first sites healed completely only with the clips while closure of colonic perforation
also required insertion of self-expandable metallic stent. Surgery was not required
in any of the three patients.
Immediate identification and closure of the perforation is the key to achieving success
with endoclips.[12] Instant closure of the intestinal tear reduces, in theory, the spread of digestive
enzymes, bile, and bacteria to peritoneum. With less inflammatory damage and bacterial
contamination, antibiotics and symptomatic management may be sufficient to prevent
further morbidity.[12] In the above case reports, the intestinal perforation has been closed by endoclips
using a through-the-scope system, which has certain limitations. Due to the low closure
force and the limited opening distance between the clip jaws, multiple clips are required
to close the defect. We used two clips in two and three in one case.
Recent studies recommend the use of an endoclipping device for the management of iatrogenic
gastrointestinal perforations in select cases that fulfill the following criteria:
instant identification of the perforation during the procedure; a tear that is <10
mm in size; an endoscopy team that is experienced with using endoclips; and the availability
of surgical help.[12] After the procedure, the patient should be admitted to the hospital for medical
management including nil-per-os, nasogastric suctioning, and intravenous fluids and
antibiotics.[12] Moreover, the patient should be closely monitored for signs of peritonitis, subcutaneous
emphysema, hemodynamic instability, and sepsis.[12] We followed the same protocol more stringently. Imaging studies should be performed
24 h after the procedure, and a liquid diet may be started if the imaging study does
not show any leakage of contrast.[12],[13] In our series, methylene blue was given through the nasogastric tube, and the drain
was inspected for blue discoloration to identify the leak from DUP.
Although there were no complications associated with the use of clips for the closure
of perforated duodenal ulcers, more studies are required to confirm the indications
and safety associated with them.
We recommend that in a certain select group of young patients of DUP who have presented
early and are hemodynamically stable, endoscopic clips may be applied to approximate
mucosa. With supportive conservative treatment offered, thereafter healing of perforation
occurs without the need for laparotomy or laparoscopy for suturing the same.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
