Development and Validation of Detailed Clinical Models for Nursing Problems in Perinatal care

Keywords

Information sharing - model - standards - data collection - knowledge representation

 

• References

• 1 Joint Initiative for Global Standards Harmonization [cited 2011 March 2]; A available from: http://www.skmtglossary.org
• 2 Elkin PL. et al. Aequus communis sententia: defining levels of interoperability. Stud Health Technol Inform 2007; 129: 725-729.
• 3 Kalra D. Semantic interoperability deployment and research roadmap. EU workshops in Brussels 2007.
• 4 ISO 18104:2003. Health informatics –integration of a reference terminology model for nursing.. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
• 5 Goossen WTF, Goossen-Baremans AT, Zel van der M. Detailed clinical models: a review. Healthc Inform Res 2010; 12, 16 (Suppl. 04) 201-214.
• 6 ISO/CEN/Working Draft 13972 Health Informatics –quality criteria and methodology for detailed clinical models draft materials.. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland and the European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.
• 7 Oniki T. Clinical element models at Intermountain Healthcare. Paper presented at the EHR Symposium in Seoul 2008.
• 8 openEHR Foundation.. openEHR clinical archetypes [cited 2010 May 26]; Available from: http://www.openehr.org/knowledge
• 9 Hoy D, Hardiker NR, McNicoll IT, Westwell P. A feasibility study on clinical templates for the national health service in Scotland. Stud Health Technol Inform 2007; 129: 770-774.
• 10 Center for Interoperable EHR CiEHR.. Clinical Contents Manager. Seoul, Korea, Web documents [cited 2010 November 26]; Available from: http:// www. Clinicalcontentsmodel.org/main.php
• 11 Health Level 7.. Normative Edition of the HL7 Standards 2010. Ann Arbor, HL7 international. [cited 2010 November 21]; Available from: http://www.hl7.org
• 12 Goossen WTF. Using detailed clinical models to bridge the gap between clinicians and HIT. In: De Clercq, E et al. (Eds). Collaborative patient centered eHealth. Proceedings of the HIT@Healthcare 2008. Amsterdam: IOS press; 3-10.
• 13 Kooij van der J, Goossen WTF, Goossen-Baremans ATM, Plaisier N. Evaluation of documents that integrate knowledge, terminology and information models. In: Park HA, Murray P, Delaney C, (Eds). Consumer-centered computer-supported care for healthy people. Proceedings of NI2006. Amsterdam etc. IOS Press; Stud Health Technol Inform, 2006. 122 519-522.
• 14 Hovenga E, Garde S, Heard S. Nursing constraint models for electronic health records: a vision for domain knowledge governance. Int J Med Inform 2005; 74: 886-898.
• 15 Min YH, Park HA. Development and validation of archetypes for nursing problem in breast cancer patients. J Korean Soc Med Inform 2009; 15: 393-401.
• 16 ISO/TS 22789:2010. Health informatics –conceptual framework for patient findings and problems in terminologies. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
• 17 ISO 21090:2011. Health informatics –harmonized data types for information interchange. International Organization for Standaradization, Geneva, Switzerland.
• 18 Kang YM. et al. A case of aplastic anemia in pregnancy refractory to platelet transfusion. Korean J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 49: 182-187.
• 19 Knoche A, Selzer C, Smolley K. Methods of stimulating the onset of labor: an exploration of maternal satisfaction. J Midwifery Women’s Health 2008; 53: 381-387.