Applied Clinical Informatics, Table of Contents Appl Clin Inform 2011; 02(03): 350-354DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2011-05-IE-0032 Invited Editorial Schattauer GmbH Opportunities to Increase the Effectiveness of EHR-Based Diabetes Clinical Decision Support P. O‘Connor 1 HealthPartners – Research Foundation, Minneapolis Minnesota, United States › Author Affiliations Recommend Article Abstract Full Text PDF Download Keywords KeywordsElectronic medical records - clinical decision support - CDS - diabetes - evidence-based medicine - conflict of interest - clinical guidelines References References 1 Meigs JB, Cagliero E, Dubey A. et al. A controlled trial of web-based diabetes disease management: the MGH diabetes primary care improvement project. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 750-757. 2 Montori VM, Dinneen SF, Gorman CA. et al. The impact of planned care and a diabetes electronic management system on community-based diabetes care: the Mayo Health System Diabetes Translation Project. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 1952-1952. 3 Crosson JC, Stroebel C, Scott JG. et al. Implementing an electronic medical record in a family medicine practice: communication, decision making, and conflict. Ann Fam Med 2005; 3: 307-307. 4 O’Connor PJ. Electronic medical records and diabetes care improvement: Are we waiting for Godot?. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 942-943. 5 O’Connor PJ, Sperl-Hillen JM, Rush WA. et al. Impact of electronic health record clinical decision support on diabetes care: a randomized trial. Ann Fam Med 2011; 9: 12-21. 6 Bates DW, Bitton A. The future of health information technology in the patient-centered medical home. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010; 29: 614-621. 7 Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A. et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA 2005; 293: 1197-1203. 8 ICSI.. Diagnosis and Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Adults. 14th Edition July 2010 ed., Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement; Bloomington, MN.: 9 IOM.. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust,. In Institute of Medicine; 2011 10 American Diabetes Association.. Standards of medical care in diabetes –2011. Diabetes Care 2011; 34: s11-s61. 11 American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.. ACE consensus conference on guidelines for glycemic control 2001. Available at: www.aace.com/pub/press/releases/diabetesconsensuswhitepaper.php. 12 Eledrisi M. Comments on the AACE/ACE statement on glycemic control for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Endocr Pract 2010; 16: 130–131; author reply: 131-132. 13 Rodbard HW, Jellinger PS. The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology (AACE/ACE) algorithm for managing glycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: comparison with the ADA/EASD algorithm. Diabetologia 2010; 53: 2458-2460. 14 AACE.. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Medical Guidelines for Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan 2011) (AACE, Ed.). 15 American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes –2011. Diabetes Care 2011; 34: S97. 16 Kantor M, Wright A, Burton M. et al. Comparison of computer-based clinical decision support systems and content for diabetes mellitus. Appl Clin Inf 2011; 2: 284-303.