Applied Clinical Informatics, Table of Contents Appl Clin Inform 2013; 04(02): 185-200DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2013-01-RA-0005 Research Article Schattauer GmbH An Information Systems Model of the Determinants of Electronic Health Record Use P. Messeri 1 Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia Univiersity, Sociomedical Sciences, New York, New York, United States , S. Khan 2 Columbia University, BIomedical Informatics, News York, United States , M. Millery 3 Columbia University, Socomedical Sciences, New York, New York, United States , A. Campbell 4 Pennsylvania State University, Population Research Institute, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States , J. Merrill 5 Columbia University, Biomedical Informatics, New York, New York, United States , S. Shih 6 NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygene, New York, New York, United States , R. Kukafka 5 Columbia University, Biomedical Informatics, New York, New York, United States › Author Affiliations Recommend Article Abstract Full Text PDF Download Keywords KeywordsElectronic health records - health information technology - EHR evaluation - provider assessment of EHR quality References References 1 Institute of Medicine (U. S.) Committee on Data Standards for Patient Safety. Key capabilities of an electronic health record system : letter report. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press; 2003 2 Blumenthal D. Stimulating the Adoption of Health Information Technology. N Engl J Med 2009; 360 (15) 1477-1479. 3 Wang SJ. et al. A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. Am J Med 2003; 114 (05) 397-403. 4 Bates DW. et al. The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1999; 6 (04) 313-321. 5 Kuperman GJ, Teich JM, Gandhi TK, Bates DW. Patient safety and computerized medication ordering at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2001; 27 (10) 509-521. 6 Keyhani S. et al. Electronic health record components and the quality of care. Med Care 2008; 46 (12) 1267-1272. 7 Zhou L. et al. The relationship between electronic health record use and quality of care over time. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 16 (04) 457-464. 8 Wolfstadt JI. et al. The effect of computerized physician order entry with clinical decision support on the rates of adverse drug events: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 2008; 23 (04) 451-458. 9 Kaushal R, Shojania KG, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163 (12) 1409-1416. 10 Bates DW. et al. What proportion of common diagnostic tests appear redundant?. Am J Med 1998; 104 (04) 361-368. 11 Kellermann AL, Jones SS. What it will take to achieve the as-yet-unfulfilled promises of health information technology. Health Affairs 2013; 32 (01) 63-68. 12 DesRoches CM. et al. Small, nonteaching, and rural hospitals continue to be slow in adopting electronic health record systems. Health Affairs 2012; 31 (05) 1092-1099. 13 Hsiao CJ, Hing E. Use and characteristics of electronic health record systems among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001–2012. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics,; 2012 14 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. 2009 15 Electronic Health Record Incentive Program, Proposed rule Fed Regist. 2010 16 DeLone WH, McLean ER. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Inform Syst Res 1992; 3 (01) 60-95. 17 DeLone WH, McLean ER. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year Update. JIMS 2003; 19 (04) 9-30. 18 Iivari J. An empirical test of the DeLone-McLean model of information system success. SIGMIS Database 2005; 36 (02) 8-27. 19 van der Meijden MJ, Tange HJ, Troost J, Hasman A. Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: A literature review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003; 10 (03) 235-243. 20 Hayrinen K, Saranto K, Nykanen P. Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature. Int J Med Inform 2008; 77 (05) 291-304. 21 Otieno OG. et al. Nurses’ views on the use, quality and user satisfaction with electronic medical records: questionnaire development. J Adv Nurs 2007; 60 (02) 209-219. 22 Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 1989; 13 (03) 319-340. 23 Petter S, DeLone W, McLean ER. Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. EJIS 2008; 17: 236-263. 24 Fan-Yun P, Kai-I H. Applying the technology acceptance model to the introduction of healthcare information systems. Technol Forecast Soc 2011; 78 (04) 650-660. 25 Palm JP, Colombet I, Sicotte C, Degoulet P. Determinants of user satisfaction with a clinical information system. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006: 614-618. 26 Wixom BH, Todd PA. A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Inform Syst Res 2005; 16 (01) 82-105. 27 Mostashari F, Tripathi M, Kendall M. A tale of two large community electronic health record extension projects. Health Affairs 2009; 28 (02) 345-356. 28 Hardin JW, Hilber JM. Generalized estimating equations. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2003 29 van Buuren S, Boshuizen HC, Knook DJ. Multiple imputation of missing blood pressure covariates in a survival analysis. Stat Med 1999; 18: 681-694. 30 Rubin D. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1987 31 Kirakowski J. SUMI: the Software Usability Measurement Inventory. Brit J Educ Technol 1993; 24 (03) 210-212. 32 Doll WJ, Torkzadeh K. The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Quarterly 1988; 12 (12) 259-274. 33 Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and Test. Decision Sci 1996; 27 (03) 451-481. 34 O’Connell RT, Cho C, Shah N, Brown K, Shiffman Rn.. Takes note(s): Differential EHR satisfaction with two implementations under one roof. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11 (01) 43-49. 35 Simon SR. et al. Correlates of electronic health record adoption in office practices: a statewide survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007; 14 (01) 110-117. 36 Laerum H, Faxvaag A. Task-oriented evaluation of electronic medical records systems: development and validation of a questionnaire for physicians. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2004; 4: 1. 37 MacKinnon D. Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis. New York: Taylor & Francis Group; 2008 38 Yusof MM, Kuljis J, Papazafeiropoulou A, Stergioulas LK. An evaluation framework for Health Information Systems: human, organization and technology-fit factors (HOT-fit). International Journal of Medical Informatics 2008; 77 (06) 377-385. 39 Lau F, Price M, Keshavjee K. From benefits evaluation to clinical adoption: making sense of health information system success in Canada. Healthcare Quarterly 2001; 14 (01) 39-45.
