Applied Clinical Informatics, Table of Contents Appl Clin Inform 2014; 05(02): 594-602DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2013-12-RA-0108 Research Article Schattauer GmbH State Funding for Health Information Technology and Selected Ambulatory Healthcare Quality Measures L. M. Kern 1 Center for Healthcare Informatics and Policy, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY. 2 Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY. 3 Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY. 4 Health Information Technology Evaluation Collaborative, New York, NY. , M. Silver 2 Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY. 4 Health Information Technology Evaluation Collaborative, New York, NY. , R. Kaushal 1 Center for Healthcare Informatics and Policy, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY. 2 Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY. 3 Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY. 4 Health Information Technology Evaluation Collaborative, New York, NY. 5 Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY. 6 New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY. , with the HITEC Investigators › Author Affiliations Recommend Article Abstract Full Text PDF Download Keywords KeywordsElectronic health records - quality of health care - primary health care References References 1 Cebul RD, Love TE, Jain AK, Hebert CJ. Electronic health records and quality of diabetes care. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 825-833. 2 Friedberg MW, Coltin KL, Safran DG, Dresser M, Zaslavsky AM, Schneider EC. Associations between structural capabilities of primary care practices and performance on selected quality measures. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 456-463. 3 Garrido T, Jamieson L, Zhou Y, Wiesenthal A, Liang L. Effect of electronic health records in ambulatory care: retrospective, serial, cross sectional study. BMJ 2005; 330: 581. 4 Keyhani S, Hebert PL, Ross JS, Federman A, Zhu CW, Siu AL. Electronic health record components and the quality of care. Med Care 2008; 46: 1267-1272. 5 Linder JA, Ma J, Bates DW, Middleton B, Stafford RS. Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167: 1400-1405. 6 Poon EG, Wright A, Simon SR. et al. Relationship between use of electronic health record features and health care quality: results of a statewide survey. Med Care 2010; 48: 203-209. 7 Romano MJ, Stafford RS. Electronic Health Records and Clinical Decision Support Systems: Impact on National Ambulatory Care Quality. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171: 897-903. 8 Walsh MN, Yancy CW, Albert NM. et al. Electronic health records and quality of care for heart failure. Am Heart J 2010; 159: 635-462 e1. 9 Zhou L, Soran CS, Jenter CA. et al. The relationship between electronic health record use and quality of care over time. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 16: 457-464. 10 Fontaine P, Ross SE, Zink T, Schilling LM. Systematic review of health information exchange in primary care practices. J Am Board Fam Med 2010; 23: 655-670. 11 Hincapie A, Warholak T. The impact of health information exchange on health outcomes. Applied Clinical Informatics 2011; 2: 499-507. 12 Blumenthal D. Launching HITECH. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 382-385. 13 Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The „Meaningful Use“ Regulation for Electronic Health Records. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 501-504. 14 New York State Department of Health.. Healthcare Efficiency and Affordability Law for New Yorkers Capital Grant Program. (Accessed on May 14, 2014, at http://www.health.ny.gov/technology/efficien cy_and_affordability_law/.) 15 New York State Department of Health.. Health information technology. (Accessed on May 14, 2014, at http://www.health.ny.gov/technology/.) 16 Kern LM, Wilcox AB, Shapiro J. et al. Community-based health information technology alliances: potential predictors of early sustainability. Am J Manag Care 2011; 17: 290-295. 17 U. S. Department of Health and Human Services.. Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program. Final Rule. 75 Federal Register 44314 (2010) (42 CFR Parts 412, 413, 422 and 495). 18 Kern LM, Barron Y, Abramson EL, Patel V, Kaushal R. HEAL NY: Promoting interoperable health information technology in New York State. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009; 28: 493-504. 19 Kern LM, Kaushal R. Health information technology and health information exchange in New York State: new initiatives in implementation and evaluation. J Biomed Inform 2007; 40: S17-S20. 20 Donabedian A. The quality of care: How can it be assessed?. JAMA 1988; 260: 1743-1748. 21 National Quality Forum.. Measure evaluation criteria. (Accessed May 8, 2014, at https://www.qualityfor um.org/docs/measure_evaluation_criteria.aspx. 22 Kern LM, Edwards A, Kaushal R. The patient-centered medical home, electronic health records, and quality of care. Ann Intern Med (In press). 23 Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S. et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: 742-752. 24 Kern LM, Barron Y, Dhopeshwarkar RV, Edwards A, Kaushal R. Electronic health records and ambulatory quality of care. J Gen Intern Med 2013; 28: 496-503.
