Use of an Expedited Review Tool to Screen for Prior Diagnostic Error in Emergency Department Patients

Summary

Objective: Missed diagnoses are an important area of care quality resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Determination of rates and causes has been limited by difficulties in screening, including the effort of manual chart review. We developed and tested a semi- automated review tool to expedite screening for diagnostic errors in an electronic health record (EHR).

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients seen in the emergency department (ED) of a teaching hospital over 31 days, using an automated screen to identify those with a prior in-system visit during the 14 days preceding their ED visit. We collected prior and subsequent notes from the institution’s EHR for these cases, then populated a specially designed relational database enabling rapid comparison of prior visit records to the sentinel ED visit. Each case was assessed for potential missed or delayed diagnosis, and rated by likelihood as “definite, probable, possible, unlikely or none.”

Results: A total of 5 066 patient encounters were screened by a clinician using the tool, of which 1 498 (30%) had a clinical encounter within the preceding 14 days. Of these, 37 encounters (2.6% of those reviewed) were “definite” or “probable” missed diagnoses. The rapid review tool took a mean of 1.9 minutes per case for primary review, compared with 11.2 minutes per case for reviews without the automated tool.

Conclusions: Diagnostic errors were present in a significant number of cases presenting to the ED after recent healthcare visits. An innovative review tool enabled a substantially increased efficiency in screening for diagnostic errors.

Keywords

Monitoring and surveillance - error management and prevention - emergency and disaster care - data processing - human-computer inter action - diagnostic error

 

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interests in this research.

• References

• 1 Schiff GD, Kim S, Abrams R, Cosby K, Lambert B, Elstein AS, Hasler S, Krosnjar N, Odwazny R, Wisniewski MF, McNutt RA. Diagnosing Diagnosis Errors: Lessons from a Multi-institutional Collaborative Project. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Marks ES, Lewin DI. eds. Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation (Volume 2: Concepts and Methodology). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2005: 255-278.
• 2 Newman-Toker DE, Pronovost PJ. Diagnostic errors: the next frontier for patient safety. JAMA 2009; 301: 1060-1062.
• 3 Gandhi TK, Kachalia A, Thomas EJ, Puopolo AL, Yoon C, Brennan TA, Studdert DM. Missed and delayed diagnoses in the ambulatory setting: a study of closed malpractice claims. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145: 488-496.
• 4 Studdert DM, Mello MM, Gawande AA, Gandhi TK, Kachalia A, Yoon C, Puopolo AL, Brennan TA. Claims, errors, and compensation payments in medical malpractice litigation. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 2024-2033.
• 5 Kachalia A, Gandhi TK, Puopolo AL, Yoon C, Thomas EK, Griffey R, Brennan TA, Studdert DM. Missed and delayed diagnoses in the emergency department: a study of closed malpractice claims from 4 liability insurers. Ann Emerg Med 2007; 49: 196-205.
• 6 Saber Tehrani AS, Lee H, Mathews SC, Shore A, Makary MA, Pronovost PJ, Newman-Toker DE. 25-Year summary of US malpractice claims for diagnostic errors 1986–2010: an analysis from the National Practitioner Data Bank. BMJ Qual Saf 2013; 22: 672-680.
• 7 Schiff GD, Puopolo AL, Huben-Kearney A, Yu W, Keorhan C, McDonough P, Ellis BR, Bates DW, Biondolillo M. Primary care closed claims experience of Massachusetts malpractice insurers. JAMA Intern Med 2013; 173: 2063-2068.
• 8 Wears RL, Nemeth CP. Replacing hindsight with insight: towards a better understanding of diagnostic failures. Ann Emerg Med 2007; 49 (02) 206-209.
• 9 Graber ML. The incidence of diagnostic error in medicine. BMJ Qual Saf 2013; 22: ii21-ii27.
• 10 Calder L, Pozgay A, Riff S, Rothwell D, Youngson E, Mojaverian N, Cwinn A, Forster A. Adverse events in patients with return emergency department visits. BMJ Qual Saf 2015; 24 (02) 142-148.
• 11 Singh H, Thomas EJ, Khan MM, Petersen LA. Identifying diagnostic errors in primary care using an electronic screening algorithm. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167: 302-308.
• 12 Singh H, Giardina TD, Forjuoh SN, Reis MD, Kosmach S, Khan MM, Thomas EJ. Electronic health record-based surveillance of diagnostic errors in primary care. BMJ Qual Saf 2012; 21: 93-100.
• 13 Schiff G. Finding and fixing diagnosis errors: can triggers help?. BMJ Qual Saf 2012; 21: 89-92.
• 14 Singh H, Giardina TD, Meyer AN, Forjuoh SN, Reis MD, Thomas EJ. Types and origins of diagnostic errors in primary care settings. JAMA Intern Med 2013; 173: 418-425.
• 15 Nuñez S, Hexdall A, Aguirre-Jaime A. Unscheduled returns to the emergency department: an outcome of medical errors?. Qual Saf Health Care 2006; 15: 102-108.
• 16 Plaisant C, Mushlin R, Snyder A, Li J, Heller D, Shneiderman B. LifeLines: using visualization to enhance navigation and analysis of patient records. Proc AMIA Symp 1998: 76-80.
• 17 Bui AA, Aberle DR, Kangarloo H. TimeLine: visualizing integrated patient records. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2007; 11: 462-473.
• 18 Graber M. Diagnostic errors in medicine: a case of neglect. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2005; 31: 106-113.
• 19 Singh H, Meyer AN, Thomas EJ. The frequency of diagnostic errors in outpatient care: estimations from three large observational studies involving US adult populations. BMJ Qual Saf 2014; 23: 727-731.
• 20 Henriksen K. Improving diagnostic performance: some unrecognized obstacles. Diagnosis 2014; 1 (01) 35-48.