Physician Perceptions and Beliefs about Generating and Providing a Clinical Summary of the Office Visit

S. Emani; D.Y. Ting; M. Healey; S.R. Lipsitz; H. Ramelson; V. Suric; D.W. Bates

doi:10.4338/ACI-2015-04-RA-0043

Applied Clinical Informatics, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Appl Clin Inform 2015; 06(03): 577-590
DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2015-04-RA-0043

Research Article

Schattauer GmbH

Physician Perceptions and Beliefs about Generating and Providing a Clinical Summary of the Office Visit

S. Emani

¹Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States

,

D.Y. Ting

²Massachusetts General Physicians Organization, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston,MA, United States

,

M. Healey

¹Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States

³Brigham and Women’s Physician Organization, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States

,

S.R. Lipsitz

¹Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States

,

H. Ramelson

⁴Information Services, Partners HealthCare, Boston, MA, United States

,

V. Suric

¹Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States

,

D.W. Bates

¹Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States

⁵Department of Healthcare Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Volltext

als PDF herunterladen

Keywords

Electronic health records - meaningful use - after visit summary - physicians - beliefs - evaluation

Referenzen

References
1 Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The ”meaningful use“ regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med 2010; 363 (06) 501-504.
2 Buntin MB, Jain SH, Blumenthal D. Health information technology: laying the infrastructure for national health reform. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010; 29 (06) 1214-1219.
3 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.. Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaning Use Core Measures Measure 8 of 17. 2012: 1-3.
4 Hummel J, Evans P. Providing clinical summaries to patients after each office visit: A clinical guide. 2012. Seattle, WA: Qualis Health.
5 Chung AE, Shea CM. After-Visit Clinical Summaries: What is Meaningful to Patients? Presented at American Medical Informatics Association 2013 Annual Symposium. 2013. Washington D.C.:
6 Pavlik V, Brown AE, Nash S, Gossey JT. Association of patient recall, satisfaction, and adherence to content of an electronic health record (EHR)-generated after visit summary: A randomized control trial. J Am Board Fam Med 2014; 27: 209-218.
7 Emani S, Ting DY, Healey M, Lipsitz SR, Karson AS, Einbinder JS, Leinen L, Suric V, Bates DW. Physician beliefs about the impact of meaningful use of the EHR. Appl Clin Inform 2014; 5: 789-801.
8 Zandieh SO, Abramson EL, Pfoh ER, Yoon-Flannery K, Edwards A, Kaushal R. Transitioning between ambulatory EHRs: a study of practitioners’ perspectives. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012; 19: 401-406.
9 Agarwal R, Prasad J. A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research 1998; 9 (02) 204-215.
10 Emani S, Yamin CK, Peters E, Karson AS, Lipsitz SR, Wald JS, Williams DH, Bates DW. Patient perceptions of a personal health record: A test of the diffusion of innovation model. J Med Internet Res 2012; 14 (06) e150.
11 DesRoches CM, Audet A-M, Painter M, Donelan K. Meeting meaningful use criteria and managing patient populations. Ann Intern Med 2013; 158: 791-799.
12 Rogers E. Diffusion of innovations. 5th edn. New York: Simon and Schuster,; 2003
13 Bloomrosen M, Starren J, Lorenzi NM, Ash JS, Patel VL, Shortliffe EH. Anticipating and addressing the unintended consequences of health IT and policy: a report from the AMIA 2009 Health Policy meeting. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011; 18: 82-90.
14 Schade CP, Sullivan FM, Lusignan SD, Madeley J. e-Prescribing, efficiency, quality: Lessons learned from the computerization of UK family practice. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13: 470-475.
15 Tang P. Informing patients: A guide for providing patients health information. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998; 5: 563-563.
16 Grabenbauer L, Fraser R, McClay J, Woelfl N, Thompson CB, Cambell J, Windle J. Adoption of EHR –a qualitative study of academic and private physicians and health administrators. Appl Clin Inform 2011; 2: 165-176.
17 Grabenbauer L, Skinner A, Windle J. Electronic health record adoption –maybe it’s not about the money: physician super-users, electronic health records and patient care. Appl Clin Inform 2011; 2: 460-471.
18 Holden RJ. Physicians’ beliefs about using EMR and CPOE: In pursuit of a contextualized understanding of health IT use behavior. Int J Med Inform 2010; 79 (02) 71-80.
19 Gold MR, McLaughlin CG, Devers KJ, Berenson RA, Bovbjerg RR. Obtaining providers’ ’buy-in’ and establishing effective means of information exchange will be critical to HITECH’s success. Health Aff (Mill-wood) 2012; 31 (03) 514-526.