Applied Clinical Informatics, Table of Contents Appl Clin Inform 2017; 08(01): 162-179DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2016-09-RA-0152 Research Article Schattauer GmbH Evaluating a Modular Decision Support Application For Colorectal Cancer Screening Laura G. Militello 1 Applied Decision Science, Dayton, Ohio , Julie B. Diiulio 1 Applied Decision Science, Dayton, Ohio , Morgan R. Borders 1 Applied Decision Science, Dayton, Ohio , Christen E. Sushereba 1 Applied Decision Science, Dayton, Ohio , Jason J. Saleem 2 Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA , Donald Haverkamp 3 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Albuquerque, NM, USA , Thomas F. Imperiale 4 Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine 5 Regenstrief Institute 6 Richard L Roudebush, VA Medical Center’s Center of Innovation › Author Affiliations Recommend Article Abstract Full Text PDF Download Keywords KeywordsHealth information technology - decision support techniques - evaluation methodology - colorectal cancer - cancer screening References References 1 Kaplan B. Evaluating informatics applications-clinical decision support systems literature review. Int J Med Inform 2001; 64: 15-37. 2 Kaplan B. Evaluating informatics applications-some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism. Int J Med Inform 2001; 64: 39-56. 3 Littlejohns P, Wyatt JC, Garvican L. Evaluating computerised health information systems: hard lessons still to be learnt. BMJ 2001; 326: 860-863. 4 Talmon J, Ammenwerth E, Brender J, de Keizer N, Nykänen P, Rigby M. STARE-HI-Statement on reporting of evaluation studies in Health Informatics. Int J Med Inform 2009; 78: 1-9. 5 Hanauer D, Zheng K. Measuring the impact of health information technology. Applied clinical informatics 2012; 3 (Suppl. 03) 334-336. 6 Ammenwerth E, Brender J, Nykänen P, Prokosch HU, Rigby M, Talmon J. Visions and strategies to improve evaluation of health information systems: Reflections and lessons based on the HIS-EVAL workshop in Innsbruck. Int J Med Inform 2004; 73: 479-491. 7 Lowry SZ, Quinn MT, Ramaiah M, Schumacher RM, Patterson ES, North R, Zhang J, Gibbons MC, Abbot P. Technical evaluation, testing, and validation of the usability of electronic health records. National Institute of Standards and Technology Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR) 7804. 2012. 8 Lowry SZ, Ramaiah M, Patterson ES, Brick D, Gurses AP, Ozok A, Simmons D, Gibbons MC. Integrating Electronic Health Records into Clinical Workflow: An Application of Human Factors Modeling Methods to Ambulatory Care. National Institute of Standards and Technology Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR) 7988. 2014. 9 Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, Smith RA, Brooks D, Andrews KS, Dash C, Giardiello FM, Glick S, Levin TR, Pickhardt P. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: A joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 2008; 58: 130-160. 10 Frazier AL, Colditz GA, Fuchs CS, Kuntz KM. Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population. JAMA 2000; 284 (Suppl. 15) 1954-1961. 11 Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, Landsdorp-Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Hankey BF, Shi W, Bond JH, Schapiro M, Panish JF, Stewart ET. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012; 366 (Suppl. 08) 687-696. 12 Subramanian S, Klosterman M, Amonkar MM, Hunt TL. Adherence with colorectal cancer screening guidelines: a review. Prev Med 2004; 38: 536-550. 13 Brawarsky P, Brooks DR, Mucci LA, Wood PA. Effect of physician recommendation and patient adherence on rates of colorectal cancer testing. Cancer Detect Prev 2004; 28: 260-268. 14 Janz NK, Wren PA, Schottenfeld D, Guire KE. Colorectal cancer screening attitudes and behavior: a population-based study. Prev Med 2003; 627-634. 15 Hudson SV, Ohman-Strickland P, Cunningham R, Ferrante JM, Hahn K, Crabtree BF. The effects of team-work and system support on colorectal cancer screening in primary care practices. Cancer Detect Prev 2007; 31: 417-423. 16 Sarfaty M, Wender R. How to increase colorectal cancer screening rates in practice. CA Cancer J Clin 2007; 57: 354-366. 17 Saleem JJ, Militello LG, Arbuckle N, Flanagan M, Haggstrom DA, Linder JA, Doebbeling BN. Provider perceptions of colorectal cancer screening decision support at three benchmark institutions. In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings. 2009: 558-562. 18 Lowry SZ, Ramaiah M, Patterson ES, Prettyman SS, Simmons D, Brick D, Latkany P, Gibbons MC. Technical Evaluation, Testing, and Validation of the Usability of Electronic Health Records: Empirically based use cases for validating safety – enhanced usability and guidelines for standardization. National Institute of Standards and Technology Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR) 7804-1. 2015. 19 Militello LG, Saleem JJ, Borders MR, Sushereba CE, Haverkamp D, Wolf SP, Doebbeling BN. Designing colorectal cancer screening decision support: a cognitive engineering enterprise. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making 2016; 10 (Suppl. 01) 74-90. 20 Kawamoto K. Integration of knowledge resources into applications to enable clinical decision support: architectural considerations. In: Greenes R. ed. Clinical Decision Support: The road ahead. Burlington, MA: Elsevier; 2007: 503-539. 21 Sim I, Gorman P, Greenes R, Haynes RB, Kaplan B, Lehnmann H, Tang PC. Clinical decision support systems for the practice of evidence-based medicine. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2001; 8 (Suppl. 06) 527-534. 22 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.. Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Annals of Internal Medicine 2008; 1406-1422. 23 Militello LG, Dominguez CO, Lintern G, Klein G. The Role of Cognitive Systems Engineering in the Systems Design Process. Systems Engineering 2009; 13 (Suppl. 03) 261-273. 24 Kirwan B, Ainsworth LK. A Guide to Task Analysis. London: Tailor & Francis; 1992 25 Faulkner Laura. Beyond the five-user assumption: Benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 2003; 35 (Suppl. 03) 379-383. 26 Vidulich MA, Tsang PS. Absolute magnitude estimation and relative judgment approaches to subjective workload assessments. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 31st Annual Meeting. 1987: 1057-1061. 27 Vidulich MA. The use of judgment matrices in subjective workload assessment: The Subjective Workload Dominance (SWORD) technique. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting. 1989: 1406-1410. 28 Zijlstra F, Van Doorn L. The construction of a subjective effort scale. Technical Report, Delft University of Technology 1985: 40. 29 Yen PY, Wantland D, Bakken S. Development of a customizable health IT usability evaluation scale. In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings. 2010: 917. 30 Yen PY, Sousa KH, Bakken S. Examining construct and predictive validity of the Health-IT Usability Evaluation Scale: confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling results. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014; 21 (Suppl. 02) 241-248. 31 Saaty TL. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 1990; 48 (Suppl. 01) 9-26. 32 Vidulich MA, Ward GF, Schueren J. Using the Subjective Workload Dominance (SWORD) Technique for Projective Workload Assessment. Hum Factors 1991; 33 (Suppl. 06) 677-691.
