DOI: 10.1055/s-00046128

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

Issue 07 · Volume 25 · July 2014 DOI: 10.1055/s-010-48980

Editorial

630
Jacobson, Gary P.: Predicting Who Will Benefit from Tinnitus Therapies

Articles

631
Theodoroff, Sarah M.; Schuette, Andrew; Griest, Susan; Henry, James A.: Individual Patient Factors Associated with Effective Tinnitus Treatment
644
Meyer, Carly; Hickson, Louise; Khan, Asad; Walker, David: What Is Important for Hearing Aid Satisfaction? Application of the Expectancy-Disconfirmation Model
656
Jin, Su-Hyun; Liu, Chang; Sladen, Douglas P.: The Effects of Aging on Speech Perception in Noise: Comparison between Normal-Hearing and Cochlear-Implant Listeners
666
Aspell, Elizabeth; Picou, Erin; Ricketts, Todd: Directional Benefit Is Present with Audiovisual Stimuli: Limiting Ceiling Effects
676
Gyldenkærne, Pia; Dillon, Harvey; Sharma, Mridula; Purdy, Suzanne C: Attend to This: The Relationship between Auditory Processing Disorders and Attention Deficits
688
Wilson, Richard H.: Variables that Influence the Recognition Performance of Interrupted Words: Rise-Fall Shape and Temporal Location of the Interruptions

Letters to the Editor

697
Moore, David R.; Ferguson, Melanie A.: It Is Neither Necessary nor Desirable to Test for Abnormalities in Other Modalities When Diagnosing Auditory Processing Disorder (APD)
698
McFarland, Dennis J.; Cacace, Anthony T.: Modality Specificity Is the Preferred Method for Diagnosing the Auditory Processing Disorder (APD): Response to Moore and Ferguson
699
Dillon, Harvey; Cameron, Sharon; Tomlin, Dani; Glyde, Helen: Comments on “Factors Influencing Tests of Auditory Processing: A Perspective on Current Issues and Relevant Concerns” by Tony Cacace and Dennis McFarland
703
Cacace, Anthony T.; McFarland, Dennis J.: Modality Specificity Trumps Other Methods for Diagnosing the Auditory Processing Disorder (APD): Response to Dillon et al

JAAA CEU Program

706
JAAA CEU Program