Download PDF
Informationen aus Orthodontie & Kieferorthopädie 2024; 56(04): 217-223
DOI: 10.1055/a-2342-9119
Übersichtsartikel

Indirektes Kleben unter Anwendung von CAD/CAM-Technologie

Indirect Bonding Using CAD/CAM Technology
Hisham Sabbagh
1   Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, LMU Klinikum, Poliklinik für Kieferorthopädie
,
Kathrin Becker
2   Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Poliklinik für Kieferorthopädie und Orthodontie
,
Rebecca Jungbauer
3   Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Poliklinik für Kieferorthopädie
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Digitale Technologien haben zur Entwicklung neuer Ansätze in der indirekten Bracketplatzierung geführt. Dabei kann die Bracketplatzierung virtuell in Softwareprogrammen durchgeführt werden, wobei verschiedene Simulations- und Individualisierungmöglichkeiten angewendet werden können. Anschließend ist eine modellfreie Herstellung der Bracketübertragungsschienen mithilfe von 3D-Druck Verfahren möglich.

Dieser Artikel fasst den Hintergrund und aktuelle Literatur zum CAD/CAM-Indirect-Bonding zusammen und stellt den Arbeitsprozess anhand eines Fallbeispiels dar.

Abstract

Digital technologies have led to the development of new approaches in indirect bracket placement. Bracket placement can be carried out virtually in software, whereby various simulation and customisation options can be used. Subsequently, model-free production of bracket transfer splints is possible using 3D printing processes.

This article summarises the background and current literature on CAD/CAM indirect bonding and presents the work process using a case study.

Schlüsselwörter

Bracket-Position - Indirekt Kleben - CAD/CAM - Digitaler Workflow - Additive Fertigung

Keywords

bracket position - indirect bonding - CAD/CAM - digital workflow - 3D printing


Publication History

Article published online:
02 December 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Andrews LF. The straight-wire appliance, origin, controversy, commentary. J Clin Orthod 1976; 10 p 99-114
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Silverman E. et al. A universal direct bonding system for both metal and plastic brackets. Am J Orthod 1972; 62 p 236-244
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Keim RG., Vogels Iii DS, Vogels PB. 2020 JCO Study of Orthodontic Diagnosis and Treatment Procedures Part 1: Results and Trends. J Clin Orthod 2020; 54 p 581-610
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Keim R.G. et al. 2014 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures, Part 1: results and trends. J Clin Orthod 2014; 48 p 607-630
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Keim RG. et al. 2008 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures, part 1: results and trends. J Clin Orthod 2008; 42 p 625-640
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Spitz A, Gribel BF, Marassi C. CAD/CAM TECHNOLOGY FOR DIGITAL INDIRECT BONDING. J Clin Orthod 2018; 52 p 621-628
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Brown MW. et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of a CAD/CAM orthodontic bracket system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015; 148 p 1067-1074
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Hoffmann L.. et al. Bracket transfer accuracy with two different three-dimensional printed transfer trays vs silicone transfer trays. Angle Orthod 2022; 92 p 364-371
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Hegele J.. et al. Clinical effects with customized brackets and CAD/CAM technology: a prospective controlled study. Prog Orthod 2021; 22 p 40
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Waldman A, Moshiri M, Bonebreak-Jackson C. Introduction to LightForce. J Clin Orthod 2023; 57 p 500-510
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Jungbauer R. et al. CAD/CAM-gestützte Planung und Übertragungsmöglichkeiten von Brackets und Gaumenimplantaten. Informationen aus Orthodontie & Kieferorthopädie 2020; 52 p 203-209
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Sabbagh H. et al. Bracket Transfer Accuracy with the Indirect Bonding Technique-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2022 11.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Campobasso A. et al. Transfer Accuracy of 3D-Printed Customized Devices in Digital Indirect Bonding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Dentistry. 2023
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Schmid J. et al. Transfer accuracy of two indirect bonding techniques-an in vitro study with 3D scanned models. Eur J Orthod 2018; 40 p 549-555
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Castilla AE. et al. Measurement and comparison of bracket transfer accuracy of five indirect bonding techniques. Angle Orthod 2014; 84 p 607-614
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Jungbauer R. et al. Transfer Accuracy of Two 3D Printed Trays for Indirect Bracket Bonding—An In Vitro Pilot Study. Applied Sciences 2021; 11 p 6013
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Palone M. et al. Evaluation of effectiveness and efficiency of fixed orthodontic treatment comparing standard and computer-aided design and manufacturing conventional bracket systems using indirect bonding for both: A retrospective study. J World Fed Orthod 2023; 12 p 251-259
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Sabbagh H. et al. Influence of the design of 3D-printed indirect bonding trays and experience of the clinician on the accuracy of bracket placement. J Orofac Orthop. 2024
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Wajda M, Lis J, Kawala B. Evaluating the accuracy of one-piece and three-piece 3D-printed indirect bonding transfer trays: An in vitro study. Dent Med Probl. 2024
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Czolgosz I, Cattaneo PM, Cornelis MA. Computer-aided indirect bonding versus traditional direct bonding of orthodontic brackets: bonding time, immediate bonding failures, and cost-minimization. A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod 2021; 43 p 144-151
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Li B. et al. Does clinical experience affect the bracket bonding accuracy of guided bonding devices in vitro?. Angle Orthod 2024; 94 p 59-67
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Atilla AO. et al. A comparative assessment of orthodontic treatment outcomes using the quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) method between direct bonding and indirect bonding techniques in adolescents: a single-centre, single-blind randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod 2020; 42 p 441-453
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Çokakoğlu S, Çakır E. Comparison of enamel demineralization and periodontal status between direct and digital indirect bonding techniques : A split-mouth clinical trial of direct vs. digital indirect bonding. J Orofac Orthop. 2023
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Li Y. et al. Effectiveness, efficiency and adverse effects of using direct or indirect bonding technique in orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health 2019; 19 p 137
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Bozelli JV. et al. Comparative study on direct and indirect bracket bonding techniques regarding time length and bracket detachment. Dental Press J Orthod 2013; 18 p 51-57
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Schwärzler A. et al. 3D printed indirect bonding trays: Transfer accuracy of hard versus soft resin material in a prospective, randomized, single-blinded clinical study. Dent Mater 2023; 39 p 1058-1065
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Dos Santos AL. et al. Orthodontic bracket bonding techniques and adhesion failures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Exp Dent 2022; 14 p e746-e755
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Weber DJ. et al. Clinical effectiveness and efficiency of customized vs. conventional preadjusted bracket systems. J Clin Orthod 2013; 47 p 261-266 quiz 268
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Yıldırım K, Saglam-Aydinatay B. Comparative assessment of treatment efficacy and adverse effects during nonextraction orthodontic treatment of Class I malocclusion patients with direct and indirect bonding: A parallel randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018; 154 p 26-34.e1
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Jungbauer R, Liebermann A, Kieschnick A. et al. Befestigungsmöglichkeiten von Brackets und Attachments in der Kieferorthopädie. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 2020; 154 129-135.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Pamukcu H, Ozsoy OP, Dagalp R. In vitro and in vivo comparison of orthodontic indirect bonding resins: A prospective study. Niger J Clin Pract 2018; 21 614-623.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Miles PG. Indirect bonding with a flowable light-cured adhesive. J Clin Orthod 2002; 36 p 646-647
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Jungbauer R, Hammer CM, Edelhoff D. et al. Impact of different pretreatments and attachment materials on shear bond strength of indirectly bonded brackets using CAD/CAM transfer trays to monolithic zirconia. Dent Mater 2023; 39 170-180.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Klocke A. et al. Bond Strength with Custom Base Indirect Bonding Techniques. The Angle Orthodontist 2003; 73 p 176-180
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Paul W. . Bonding techniques in lingual orthodontics. J Orthod 2013; 40 p S20-S26
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar