PDF herunterladen
Am J Perinatol
DOI: 10.1055/a-2548-0737
Short Communication

Racial Disparities in the Adherence to an Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean Protocol (ERAC): A Retrospective Observational Study at Two NYC Hospitals, 2016–2020

Abbey T. Gilman
1   Department of Anesthesiology, New York-Presbyterian, Weill Cornell, New York, New York
,
Jessica Kim
2   Department of Population Health Sciences, New York-Presbyterian, Weill Cornell, New York, New York
,
Silis Y. Jiang
1   Department of Anesthesiology, New York-Presbyterian, Weill Cornell, New York, New York
,
Sharon E. Abramovitz
1   Department of Anesthesiology, New York-Presbyterian, Weill Cornell, New York, New York
,
Robert S. White
1   Department of Anesthesiology, New York-Presbyterian, Weill Cornell, New York, New York
› Institutsangaben
Funding This work was supported by the Foundation for Anesthesia Education and Research (FAER) Mentored Research Training grant (MRTG; ID: MRTG-08–15–2021-White [Robert]).
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objective

Enhanced recovery after surgery programs for cesarean deliveries (ERAC) aim to optimize the quality of care for all patients. Race is not routinely monitored in ERAC programs. Given the extensive reports of racial disparities in obstetrical care, the goal of this study was to investigate racial differences in adherence rates to individual ERAC protocol elements.

Study Design

A cohort study was performed among cesarean delivery patients enrolled in an ERAC program at two hospitals from October 2016 to September 2020. Compliance with anesthesia-specific ERAC metrics, including ketorolac, ondansetron, and active warming methods, were compared by race. Race was self-reported by all patients. Logistic regression models stratified by pre- and post-ERAC status were used to assess relationships.

Results

The sample consisted of 7,812 cesarean delivery patients, of which 4,640 were pre-ERAC (59.4%) and 3,172 were post-ERAC (40.6%). There were no racial differences found in overall ERAC protocol adherence, active warming methods, or ondansetron administration in the pre- and post-ERAC groups. The odds of ketorolac administration in Black patients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55–0.95; p = 0.020) and Asian patients (aOR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.68–0.98; p = 0.027) pre-ERAC were significantly lower compared with white patients. In the post-ERAC group, this disparity persisted in Black (aOR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.65–0.99; p = 0.042) and Asian patients (aOR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.73–0.98; p = 0.023).

Conclusion

Appropriate implementation and adherence to all elements of the ERAC program may provide a practical approach to reducing disparities in outcomes and ensuring equitable treatment for all patients.

Key Points

  • No racial differences were found in ondansetron administration pre- and post-ERAC.

  • No racial differences were found in active warming methods pre- and post-ERAC.

  • Black patients had significantly lower odds of ketorolac administration pre- and post-ERAC.

  • Asian patients had significantly lower odds of ketorolac administration pre- and post-ERAC.

  • ERAC metrics must be routinely monitored by race to resolve any observed inequities.

Keywords

cesarean delivery - ERAS - health care disparities - maternal health - obstetric - social determinants of health

Authors' Contributions

A.G.: Investigation, visualization, project administration, and writing—original draft, review, and editing.

J.K.: Methodology, validation, formal analysis, visualization, and writing—review and editing.

S.J.: Methodology, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, and writing—review and editing.

S.A.: Conceptualization and writing—review and editing.

R.W.: Conceptualization, methodology, investigation, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition, and writing—original draft, review, and editing.


Supplementary Material



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 05. Dezember 2024

Angenommen: 27. Februar 2025

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
29. März 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Taurchini M, Del Naja C, Tancredi A. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a patient centered process. J Vis Surg 2018; 4: 40
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Society for Obstetric and Anesthesia and Perinatology. About the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology. Accessed December 8, 2023 at: https://www.soap.org/
    PubMed
  • 3 Bollag L, Lim G, Sultan P. et al. Society for obstetric anesthesia and perinatology: consensus statement and recommendations for enhanced recovery after cesarean. Anesth Analg 2021; 132 (05) 1362-1377
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Nelson G, Bakkum-Gamez J, Kalogera E. et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncology: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations-2019 update. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019; 29 (04) 651-668
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Alimena S, Fallah P, Stephenson B, Feltmate C, Feldman S, Elias KM. Comparison of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) metrics by race among gynecologic oncology patients: ensuring equitable outcomes. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 171: 31-38
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Matthews KC, White RS, Ewing J, Abramovitz SE, Kalish RB. Enhanced recovery after surgery for cesarean delivery: a quality improvement initiative. Am J Perinatol 2022; 41 (suppl 1): e362-e368
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Hedderson M, Lee D, Hunt E. et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery to change process measures and reduce opioid use after cesarean delivery: a quality improvement initiative. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 134 (03) 511-519
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Felder L, Cao CD, Konys C. et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol to improve racial and ethnic disparities in postcesarean pain management. Am J Perinatol 2022; 39 (13) 1375-1382
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Wahl TS, Goss LE, Morris MS. et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) eliminates racial disparities in postoperative length of stay after colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 2018; 268 (06) 1026-1035
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Tangel V, White RS, Nachamie AS, Pick JS. Racial and ethnic disparities in maternal outcomes and the disadvantage of peripartum Black women: a multistate analysis, 2007-2014. Am J Perinatol 2019; 36 (08) 835-848
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Tangel VE, Matthews KC, Abramovitz SE, White RS. Racial and ethnic disparities in severe maternal morbidity and anesthetic techniques for obstetric deliveries: a multi-state analysis, 2007-2014. J Clin Anesth 2020; 65: 109821
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Liese KL, Mogos M, Abboud S, Decocker K, Koch AR, Geller SE. Racial and ethnic disparities in severe maternal morbidity in the United States. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2019; 6 (04) 790-798
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Mittal S, Alsbrook D, Okwechime RT, Iqbal F, Nobleza COS. The landscape of disparities in obstetric neurocritical care and a path forward. Front Neurol 2023; 13: 1008544
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Johnson JD, Asiodu IV, McKenzie CP. et al. Racial and ethnic inequities in postpartum pain evaluation and management. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 134 (06) 1155-1162
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Badreldin N, Grobman WA, Yee LM. Racial disparities in postpartum pain management. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 134 (06) 1147-1153
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Marques IC, Wahl TS, Chu DI. Enhanced recovery after surgery and surgical disparities. Surg Clin North Am 2018; 98 (06) 1223-1232
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Rozental O, White RS, Weinberg R. Role of adherence to enhanced recovery after surgery programs in mitigating health care disparities. JAMA Surg 2020; 155 (01) 91-92
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 White RS, Matthews KC, Tangel V, Abramovitz S. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for cesarean delivery can potentially reduce healthcare and racial disparities. J Natl Med Assoc 2019; 111 (04) 464-465
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Veinot TC, Ancker JS, Bakken S. Health informatics and health equity: improving our reach and impact. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26 (8–9): 689-695
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Veinot TC, Ancker JS, Cole-Lewis H. et al. Leveling up: on the potential of upstream health informatics interventions to enhance health equity. Med Care 2019; 57 (Suppl. 6) S108-S114
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Khusid E, Lui B, Williams A, Chaturvedi R, Chen J, White RS. Enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery meta-analysis outcomes by race, ethnicity, insurance, and rurality. Int J Obstet Anesth 2023; 55: 103878
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Stephenson J. Rate of first-time cesarean deliveries on the rise in the US. JAMA Health Forum 2022; 3 (07) e222824
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 National Kidney Foundation. Race, Ethnicity, & Kidney Disease. Accessed October 25, 2024 at: https://www.kidney.org/kidney-topics/race-ethnicity-kidney-disease#:~:text=black%20or%20african%20americans%20are,the%20risk%20for%20kidney%20disease
    PubMed
  • 24 Sviggum HP, Sharpe EE. Enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery: improving patient outcomes. Patient Safety Anesth 2024; 14: 121-130
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar