Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2779-7215
The Relationship between Social Vulnerability Index, Area Deprivation Index, and Child Opportunity Index, and Treatment Course Characteristics in Infants with Surgically Intervenable Congenital Anomalies
Authors
Funding Information This project was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), National Institutes of Health, through grant (grant number: UL1TR002369). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.
Abstract
Objective
The social vulnerability index (SVI) is a place-based index used to stratify community risk. We evaluated the impact of SVI on pregnancy and infant outcomes in patients with surgically treatable congenital anomalies.
Study Design
This is a retrospective study of pregnant patients and infant dyads diagnosed from 2014 to 2022 with congenital anomalies amenable to surgical treatment. Dyads were grouped into SVI quartiles. Primary outcomes were infant morbidity and mortality, and secondary outcomes included prenatal care services, pregnancy course characteristics, and pregnant person co-morbidities. The area deprivation index and child opportunity index were also collected. Bivariate comparisons of patient characteristics and unadjusted odds ratios for death or morbidity stratified by SVI quartile were performed.
Results
Two hundred and ninety-five dyads met the inclusion criteria. Ten point two percent had low SVI, 23.7% low–medium, 35.3% medium–high, and 30.9% high. The only prenatal care service associated with SVI quartile was fetal MRI (p = 0.038), but no directional trend was observed. Infant diagnoses included 11.5% congenital diaphragmatic hernia, 27.5% gastroschisis, 18.6% intestinal atresia, 9.2% lower urinary tract obstruction, 20.3% myelomeningocele, 9.2% omphalocele, 0.3% sacrococcygeal teratoma, 8.5% tracheoesophageal fistula. The odds ratio of poor infant outcomes by SVI quartile showed a nonsignificant elevated odds ratio in the highest quartile SVI (low–medium SVI OR: 0.66 [95% CI: 0.14, 2.35], medium–high SVI OR: 0.78 [95% CI: 0.17, 2.63], and high SVI OR: 1.57 [95% CI: 0.32, 6.4]).
Conclusion
SVI quartile was not associated with infant outcomes in patients with surgically treatable congenital anomalies. Future studies should examine the impact of SVI or other indices of social vulnerability on perinatal and long-term postnatal outcomes in these high-risk patients.
Key Points
-
Healthcare inequities warrant exploration in congenital surgical pathologies.
-
Explored SVI quartile association with infant outcomes.
-
Primary outcomes were not associated with SVI quartile.
-
Nonsignificantly higher odds of poor outcome in patients with high SVI quartile.
Keywords
congenital anomalies - structural determinants of health - racism - social vulnerability index - neonatal outcomes - health equityData Availability Statement
In the interest of pursuing transparency and efficiency in the research community, our data are available for review. To maintain the protected health information of the subjects of this research, all identifiers and dates have been removed from the dataset.
Publication History
Received: 18 August 2025
Accepted: 24 December 2025
Article published online:
20 January 2026
© 2026. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Mai CT, Isenburg JL, Canfield MA. et al; National Birth Defects Prevention Network. National population-based estimates for major birth defects, 2010-2014. Birth Defects Res 2019; 111 (18) 1420-1435
- 2 Flores-Torres J, Sanchez-Valle A, Duncan JR, Panzarino V, Rodriguez JM, Kirby RS. Lower urinary tract obstruction in newborns. Adv Pediatr 2023; 70 (01) 131-144
- 3 Lakhoo K. Neonatal teratomas. Early Hum Dev 2010; 86 (10) 643-647
- 4 Profit J, Gould JB, Bennett M. et al. Racial/ethnic disparity in NICU quality of care delivery. Pediatrics 2017; 140 (03) e20170918
- 5 Goldstein GP, Pai VV, Liu J. et al. Racial/ethnic disparities and human milk use in necrotizing enterocolitis. Pediatr Res 2020; 88 (Suppl. 01) 3-9
- 6 Ravi D, Iacob A, Profit J. Unequal care: racial/ethnic disparities in neonatal intensive care delivery. Semin Perinatol 2021; 45 (04) 151411
- 7 Sigurdson K, Mitchell B, Liu J. et al. Racial/ethnic disparities in neonatal intensive care: a systematic review. Pediatrics 2019; 144 (02) e20183114
- 8 Nafiu OO, Mpody C, Aina TA, Ehie O, Tobias JD, Best AF. Race, ethnicity, and pediatric postsurgical mortality: current trends and future projections. Pediatrics 2024; 154 (02) e2024065906
- 9 Nafiu OO, Mpody C, Kim SS, Uffman JC, Tobias JD. Race, postoperative complications, and death in apparently healthy children. Pediatrics 2020; 146 (02) e20194113
- 10 Stone ML, Lapar DJ, Kane BJ, Rasmussen SK, McGahren ED, Rodgers BM. The effect of race and gender on pediatric surgical outcomes within the United States. J Pediatr Surg 2013; 48 (08) 1650-1656
- 11 Chen C, Mpody C, Sivak E, Tobias JD, Nafiu OO. Racial disparities in postoperative morbidity and mortality among high-risk pediatric surgical patients. J Clin Anesth 2022; 81: 110905
- 12 Willer BL, Mpody C, Tobias JD, Nafiu OO. Association of race and family socioeconomic status with pediatric postoperative mortality. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5 (03) e222989
- 13 CDC. Social Determinants of Health (SDOH). About CDC 2024. Accessed August 25, 2024 at: https://www.cdc.gov/about/priorities/why-is-addressing-sdoh-important.html
- 14 Peyvandi S, Baer RJ, Moon-Grady AJ. et al. Socioeconomic mediators of racial and ethnic disparities in congenital heart disease outcomes: a population-based study in California. J Am Heart Assoc 2018; 7 (20) e010342
- 15 Nashed LM, O'Neil J. The impact of socioeconomic status and race on the outcomes of congenital heart disease. Curr Opin Cardiol 2022; 37 (01) 86-90
- 16 Richardson CJ, Itua P, Duong T, Lewars J, Tiesenga F. Racial and socioeconomic disparities in congenital heart surgery: a research article. J Card Surg 2021; 36 (07) 2454-2457
- 17 Gallegos FN, Woo JL, Anderson BR, Lopez KN. Disparities in surgical outcomes of neonates with congenital heart disease across regions, centers, and populations. Semin Perinatol 2022; 46 (04) 151581
- 18 Flanagan BE, Hallisey EJ, Adams E, Lavery A. Measuring community vulnerability to natural and anthropogenic hazards: the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's social vulnerability index. J Environ Health 2018; 80 (10) 34-36
- 19 Diaz A, Hyer JM, Barmash E, Azap R, Paredes AZ, Pawlik TM. County-level social vulnerability is associated with worse surgical outcomes especially among minority patients. Ann Surg 2021; 274 (06) 881-891
- 20 Yap A, Laverde R, Thompson A. et al. Social vulnerability index (SVI) and poor postoperative outcomes in children undergoing surgery in California. Am J Surg 2023; 225 (01) 122-128
- 21 Stark AR, Pursley DM, Papile L-A. et al. Standards for levels of neonatal care: II, III, and IV. Pediatrics 2023; 151 (06) e2023061957
- 22 Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 (02) 377-381
- 23 Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL. et al; REDCap Consortium. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform 2019; 95: 103208
- 24 Bigej R, Jenkins T, Ondusko D. et al. Social Characteristics and Outcomes of Pregnant Patients and Infants Diagnosed with Surgically Intervenable Congenital Pathologies 2024. Accessed December 31, 2025 at: https://doi.org/doi:%252010.17632/hsfy5jt7g7.1
- 25 Kind AJH, Buckingham WR. Making neighborhood-disadvantage metrics accessible - the neighborhood atlas. N Engl J Med 2018; 378 (26) 2456-2458
- 26 Noelke C, McArdle N, DeVoe B. et al. Child Opportunity Index 3.0 Technical Documentation. 2024
- 27 R Core Team. _R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing_. R Foundation for Computing 2024. Accessed December 31, 2025 at: https://www.R-project.org/
- 28 Hall KC, Robinson JC, Karimi M. et al. Effect of maternal race, residential rurality, and social vulnerability on critical congenital heart defect risk. Pediatr Cardiol 2024;
- 29 Perez MT, Bucholz E, Asimacopoulos E. et al. Impact of maternal social vulnerability and timing of prenatal care on outcome of prenatally detected congenital heart disease. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022; 60 (03) 346-358
- 30 Zolotor A, Huang RW, Bhavsar NA. et al. Quantifying associations between child health and neighborhood social vulnerability: does the choice of index matter?. medRxiv 2023 (e-pub ahead of print)
- 31 Zolotor A, Huang RW, Bhavsar NA, Cholera R. Comparing social disadvantage indices in pediatric populations. Pediatrics 2024; 154 (03)
- 32 Gulersen M, Alvarez A, Suarez F. et al. Risk of severe maternal morbidity associated with maternal comorbidity burden and social vulnerability. Am J Perinatol 2024; 41 (S 01): e3333-e3340
- 33 Ondusko DS, Liu J, Hatch B, Profit J, Carter EH. Associations between maternal residential rurality and maternal health, access to care, and very low birthweight infant outcomes. J Perinatol 2022; 42 (12) 1592-1599
- 34 Stearns K, Tsaih S-W, Palatnik A. Racial and ethnic disparities in maternal and neonatal outcomes among women with chronic hypertension. Am J Perinatol 2022; 39 (10) 1033-1041
- 35 Johnson DL, Carlo WA, Rahman AKMF. et al. Health insurance and differences in infant mortality rates in the US. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6 (10) e2337690
- 36 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Health and Medicine Division, Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice, et al. Communities in Action: Pathways to Health Equity. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2017
- 37 Heller JC, Givens ML, Johnson SP, Kindig DA. Keeping it political and powerful: defining the structural determinants of health. Milbank Q 2024; 102 (02) 351-366
- 38 Lett E, Asabor E, Beltrán S, Cannon AM, Arah OA. Conceptualizing, contextualizing, and operationalizing race in quantitative health sciences research. Ann Fam Med 2022; 20 (02) 157-163
