Download PDF
J Wrist Surg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2791-1554
Scientific Article

The Effect of Surgeon Specialty on Acute Postoperative Complications after Carpometacarpal Arthroplasty

Authors

  • Charles A. Johnson

    1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States

  • Paul Pottanat 

    1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States

  • Ryan Horn

    1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States

  • Alexander J. Ment 

    1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States

  • Dane N. Daley 

    1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Funding Information The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction

Carpometacarpal (CMC) joint arthroplasty is a common procedure performed by both orthopedic and plastic surgeons to address arthritis of the thumb CMC joint. The purpose of this study was to (1) compare the postoperative outcomes between orthopedic and plastic surgeons and (2) determine how surgeon specialty impacts rates of postoperative complications following CMC arthroplasty.

Methods

All adult patients (>18 years) undergoing CMC arthroplasty were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database from 2005 to 2020. Patient demographic data and medical comorbidities were examined. Patients were classified as having a procedure by either an orthopedic surgeon or a plastic surgeon. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were used to assess the risk of postoperative complications and 30-day readmission based on surgeon specialty.

Results

A total of 5,162 patients undergoing CMC arthroplasty were included in our study, with 83.7% of procedures performed by orthopedic surgeons versus 16.3% performed by plastic surgeons. The incidence of surgical complications (p < 0.001), wound complications (p < 0.001), and superficial surgical site infections (SSIs; p < 0.001) was significantly higher when performed by plastic surgery. Additionally, operative time was significantly higher in cases performed by plastic surgeons (p = 0.001). On multivariate logistic regression, plastic surgery was independently associated with an increased risk of all complications (adjusted odds ratio [AORs] 2.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.71–4.26), over four-fold increase in the risk of wound complications (AOR 4.49, 95% CI 2.53–7.97) and superficial SSI (AOR 5.06, 95% CI 2.72–9.39) when compared with orthopedic surgery.

Conclusion

Despite similar patient demographics, CMC arthroplasty performed by plastic surgeons is independently associated with an increased risk of total postoperative complications, wound complications, and superficial infections when compared with orthopedic surgeons. Further investigation into perioperative and specialty-specific factors that contribute to discrepancies is warranted to improve outcomes and guide surgeon training.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Keywords

carpometacarpal arthritis - arthroplasty - thumb - surgeon specialty


Publication History

Received: 23 September 2025

Accepted: 15 January 2026

Article published online:
04 February 2026

© 2026. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Damen A, van der Lei B, Robinson PH. Carpometacarpal arthritis of the thumb. J Hand Surg Am 1996; 21 (05) 807-812
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Haara MM, Heliövaara M, Kröger H. et al. Osteoarthritis in the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb. Prevalence and associations with disability and mortality. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86 (07) 1452-1457
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 Lawrence JS, Bremner JM, Bier F. Osteo-arthrosis. Prevalence in the population and relationship between symptoms and X-ray changes. Ann Rheum Dis 1966; 25 (01) 1-24
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 4 Zhang Y, Niu J, Kelly-Hayes M, Chaisson CE, Aliabadi P, Felson DT. Prevalence of symptomatic hand osteoarthritis and its impact on functional status among the elderly: The Framingham Study. Am J Epidemiol 2002; 156 (11) 1021-1027
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 5 Poole JU, Pellegrini Jr VD. Arthritis of the thumb basal joint complex. J Hand Ther 2000; 13 (02) 91-107
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 6 Wajon A, Vinycomb T, Carr E, Edmunds I, Ada L. Surgery for thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2015 (02) CD004631
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 7 Vermeulen GM, Slijper H, Feitz R, Hovius SE, Moojen TM, Selles RW. Surgical management of primary thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: A systematic review. J Hand Surg Am 2011; 36 (01) 157-169
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 8 Yuan F, Aliu O, Chung KC, Mahmoudi E. Evidence-based practice in the surgical treatment of thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis. J Hand Surg Am 2017; 42 (02) 104-112.e1
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 9 Deutch Z, Niedermeier SR, Awan HM. Surgeon preference, influence, and treatment of thumb carpometacarpal arthritis. Hand (N Y) 2018; 13 (04) 403-411
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 10 Wolf JM, Delaronde S. Current trends in nonoperative and operative treatment of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: A survey of US hand surgeons. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (01) 77-82
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 11 Noureldin M, Habermann EB, Ubl DS, Kakar S. Unplanned readmissions following outpatient hand and elbow surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99 (07) 541-549
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 12 Shah KN, Defroda SF, Wang B, Weiss AC. Risk factors for 30-day complications after thumb CMC joint arthroplasty: An American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program study. Hand (N Y) 2019; 14 (03) 357-363
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 13 Goodman AD, Gil JA, Starr AM, Akelman E, Weiss AC. Thirty-day reoperation and/or admission after elective hand surgery in adults: A 10-year review. J Hand Surg Am 2018; 43 (04) 383.e1-383.e7
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 14 Lipira AB, Sood RF, Tatman PD, Davis JI, Morrison SD, Ko JH. Complications within 30 days of hand surgery: An analysis of 10,646 patients. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (09) 1852-59.e3
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 15 Menendez ME, Lu N, Unizony S, Choi HK, Ring D. Surgical site infection in hand surgery. Int Orthop 2015; 39 (11) 2191-2198
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 16 Hresko AM, Kleiner JE, Kosinski LR, Goodman AD, Gil JA. Unanticipated admission following outpatient ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition: An analysis of 3966 cases. Hand (N Y) 2022; 17 (03) 426-431
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 17 Du JY, Wang JH, Coquillard CL, Kumar AR, Malone KJ. Comparing plastic surgeon versus orthopedic surgeon outcomes following distal upper extremity amputations: A study of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Plast Surg (Oakv) 2021; 29 (02) 110-117
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 18 Wang JH, Du JY, Tu LA, Brown CC, Chepla K, Bafus BT. A comparison of 30-day perioperative complications for open operative care of distal upper-extremity fractures treated by orthopedic versus plastic surgeons: A study of the National Surgical Quality Improvement (NSQIP) database. J Hand Surg Glob Online 2020; 2 (02) 84-89
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 19 Pham JT, Lem MR, Tang CJ. A comparison of perioperative complications of hand and wrist arthroplasty for osteoarthrosis by orthopedic versus plastic surgeons. Hand (N Y) 2025; 20 (01) 122-128
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 20 Werner BC, Bridgforth AB, Gwathmey FW, Dacus AR. Trends in thumb carpometacarpal interposition arthroplasty in the United States, 2005-2011. Am J Orthop 2015; 44 (08) 363-368
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 21 Koehler LR, Kusnezov NA, Orr JD, Pallis M, Dunn JC. Orthopaedic and plastic surgery training differences manifested in the analysis of distal radius fracture fixation. J Surg Orthop Adv 2019; 28 (01) 53-57
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 22 Wei C, Gu A, Almeida ND. et al. Operation time effect on rates of perioperative complications after operative treatment of distal radius fractures. J Orthop 2021; 24: 82-85
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 23 Gowd AK, Bohl DD, Hamid KS, Lee S, Holmes GB, Lin J. Longer operative time is independently associated with surgical site infection and wound dehiscence following open reduction and internal fixation of the ankle. Foot Ankle Spec 2020; 13 (02) 104-111
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 24 Wills BW, Sheppard ED, Smith WR. et al. Impact of operative time on early joint infection and deep vein thrombosis in primary total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2018; 104 (04) 445-448
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 25 Rios-Diaz AJ, Metcalfe D, Singh M. et al. Inequalities in specialist hand surgeon distribution across the United States. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (05) 1516-1522
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 26 Aliu O, Chung KC. A role delineation study of hand surgery in the USA: Assessing variations in fellowship training and clinical practice. Hand (N Y) 2014; 9 (01) 58-66
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 27 Silvestre J, Upton J, Chang B, Steinberg DR. The impact of specialty on cases performed during hand surgery fellowship training. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018; 100 (05) e29
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 28 Noland SS, Fischer LH, Lee GK, Friedrich JB, Hentz VR. Essential hand surgery procedures for mastery by graduating plastic surgery residents: A survey of program directors. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (06) 977e-984e
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 29 Sears ED, Larson BP, Chung KC. Program director opinions of core competencies in hand surgery training: Analysis of differences between plastic and orthopedic surgery accredited programs. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (03) 582-590
    Search in Google Scholar