Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2796-8372
Five-Year Functional Outcomes and Gait Analysis Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Peroneus Longus Tendon Autograft
Authors
Funding Information The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, or publication of this article.
Abstract
The peroneus longus tendon (PLT) is an increasingly used autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Several studies have reported donor site morbidity, gait, muscle strength, and long-term safety. This study provides additional 5-year outcome data, including pedorthist-led gait and foot posture assessment. This study aimed to evaluate 5-year gait symmetry, foot posture, and patient-reported outcomes following ACLR using a PLT autograft. Seventeen patients underwent assessment 5 years after ACLR with PLT autograft. Pedorthist-led gait analysis using pressure-mapping technology measured stance time, midfoot force, center-of-pressure (COP) excursion, and gait force differential. Foot posture was classified as planus, cavus, or neutral. Patient-reported outcomes included the Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) and Tegner Activity Scale. The pedorthist, blinded to the operative side, attempted to identify the reconstructed limb. Statistical analysis used paired t-tests, Spearman correlation, and chi-square testing. At 5 years, no significant differences were detected in stance time, midfoot force, or COP excursion between operated and non-operated limbs. Gait force differentials were similar (p = 0.75). Foot posture was not associated with the operated side (p = 0.183), and FADI scores did not differ by foot type. The pedorthist correctly identified the operative limb in 23.5% of cases. PLT harvest was not associated with detectable differences in gait symmetry or arch morphology at 5 years. Findings are consistent with a favorable biomechanical profile; however, the small sample size, lack of preoperative baseline data, and the absence of a control group limit the strength of these inferences. Larger, controlled studies are needed to confirm long-term safety. The level of evidence was IV—retrospective case series with prospective biomechanical follow-up.
Keywords
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - peroneus longus tendon autograft - gait analysis - biomechanics - autograftData Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Ethical Approval
The study was approved by the local Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC).
Informed Consent
All participants provided written informed consent prior to participation.
Publication History
Received: 15 May 2025
Accepted: 24 January 2026
Accepted Manuscript online:
28 January 2026
Article published online:
10 February 2026
© 2026. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Zhao J, Huangfu X. The biomechanical and clinical application of using the anterior half of the peroneus longus tendon as an autograft source. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40 (03) 662-671
- 2 He Y, Jiang J, Xu J, Li Z, Zhao J. Peroneus longus tendon autograft has functional outcomes comparable to hamstring tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2020; 28 (09) 2941-2950
- 3 Rhatomy S, Asikin AI, Wardani AE, Rukmoyo T, Lumban-Gaol I, Budhiparama NC. Peroneus longus tendon autograft is a safe and effective alternative for ACL reconstruction. J Knee Surg 2019; 32 (08) 804-811
- 4 Alzahrani H, Alzahrani S, Alsubaie S, Alsubaie A, Alrashidi Y, Alharbi M. Functional and radiographic outcomes of peroneus longus versus hamstring autografts for ACL reconstruction: A randomized controlled trial. Orthop J Sports Med 2023; 11 (02) ):23259671221146144
- 5 Karimi M, Fatoye F, Mirbod SM. et al. Gait analysis of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed subjects with a combined tendon obtained from hamstring and peroneus longus. Knee 2013; 20 (06) 526-531
- 6 Nazem K, Barzegar M, Hosseini A, Karimi M. Can we use peroneus longus in addition to hamstring tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?. Adv Biomed Res 2014; 3: 115
- 7 Park CH, Lee WC. Donor site morbidity after lateral ankle ligament reconstruction using the anterior half of the peroneus longus tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med 2017; 45 (04) 922-928
- 8 Shao X, Shi LL, Bluman EM. et al. Satisfactory functional and MRI outcomes at the foot and ankle following harvesting of full thickness peroneus longus tendon graft. Bone Joint J 2020; 102-B (02) 205-211
- 9 Sahoo PK, Sahu MM. Analysis of postural control following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with ipsilateral peroneus longus tendon graft. Malays Orthop J 2023; 17 (01) 133-141
- 10 Mirza K, Menezes RJ, Acharya PU, Austine J, d'Almeida VR, Kamath A. Donor-site morbidity following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using peroneus longus tendon autograft. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2024; 34 (06) 3171-3180
- 11 Zhao Z, Tang L, Chen J. et al. The effect of harvesting the anterior half of the peroneus longus tendon on foot morphology and gait. J Orthop Surg Res 2024; 19 (01) 69
- 12 Velioğlu K, Öner K, Aslan FG, Okutan AE, Kerimoğlu S, Turhan AU. Harvesting the full thickness peroneus longus tendon is not associated with structural foot impairments: A 12- to 23-year follow-up study. Orthop J Sports Med 2025; 13 (04) ): 23 259671251320659
- 13 Öner K, Köse O. Is peroneus longus tendon the ideal graft for ACL reconstruction?. Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2025; 2 (01) 1-3
- 14 Butt U, Ahmad R, Aspros D, Raut V, Delmestri A. Five-year outcomes following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using peroneus longus versus hamstring tendon autograft: A randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2023; 145 -85
- 15 Wright RW, Dunn WR, Amendola A. et al. Evidence-based approach to graft choice in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2007; 23 (05) 546-557
- 16 Samuelsson K, Andersson D, Karlsson J, Andersson E, Forssblad M, Swärd L. Graft choice in ACL reconstruction: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37 (Suppl. 01) S173-S186
- 17 Barenius B, Forssblad M, Engström B, Eriksson K. Increased risk of revision with hamstring tendon grafts compared with patellar tendon grafts. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472 (03) 958-965
- 18 Choi NH, Victoroff BN, Lee JH, Kim HJ, Jung YB, Lee SH. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous peroneus longus tendon graft: A biomechanical and clinical study. Knee 2014; 21 (02) 378-382
- 19 Pailhé R, Cavaignac E, Murgier J, Laffosse JM, Swider P. Biomechanical study of ACL reconstruction grafts. J Orthop Res 2015; 33 (08) 1188-1196
- 20 Cakar A, Kose O, Selcuk H, Egerci OF, Tasatan E, Dogruoz F. Complications of peroneus longus tendon harvesting: a retrospective review of 82 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023; 143 (11) 6675-6684