Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2013; 138(05): 192-195
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1327404
Kardiologie | Commentary
Kardiologie, Radiologie
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Neue Entwicklungen im Bereich der kardiovaskulären Magnetresonanztomographie

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: new developments
M. Neizel-Wittke
1   Klinik für Kardiologie, Pneumologie und Angiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
,
J. Schulz-Menger
2   Charité Campus Buch, ECRC und Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Klinik für Kardiologie und Nephrologie
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 January 2013 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Schlüsselwörter

kardiovaskuläre MRT - koronare Herzerkrankung - Myokarditis - Kardiomyopathie

Keywords

cardiovascular MRI - coronary heart disease - myocarditis - cardiomyopathy
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Abdel-Aty H, Boye P, Zagrosek A et al. Diagnostic performance of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with suspected acute myocarditis: comparison of different approaches. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 1815-1822
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Achenbach S, Barkhausen J, Beer M et al. [Consensus recommendations of the German Radiology Society (DRG), the German Cardiac Society (DGK) and the German Society for Pediatric Cardiology (DGPK) on the use of cardiac imaging with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging]. RöFo 2012; 184: 345-368
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Bruder O, Schneider S, Nothnagel D et al. EuroCMR (European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance) registry: results of the German pilot phase. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54: 1457-1466
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Cooper LT, Baughman KL, Feldman AM et al. The role of endomyocardial biopsy in the management of cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the European Society of Cardiology Endorsed by the Heart Failure Society of America and the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Europ Heart J 2007; 28: 3076-3093
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Friedrich MG, Sechtem U, Schulz-Menger J et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in myocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53: 1475-1487
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Green JJ, Berger JS, Kramer CM et al. Prognostic value of late gadolinium enhancement in clinical outcomes for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. JACC Cardiovascular Imaging 2012; 5: 370-377
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Greenwood JP, Maredia N, Younger JF et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial. Lancet 2012; 379: 453-460
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Grun S, Schumm J, Greulich S et al. Long-term follow-up of biopsy-proven viral myocarditis: predictors of mortality and incomplete recovery. JACC 2012; 59: 1604-1615
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1445-1453
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kirk P, Roughton M, Porter JB et al. Cardiac T2* magnetic resonance for prediction of cardiac complications in thalassemia major. Circulation 2009; 120: 1961-1968
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Leyva F, Taylor R, Foley PW et al. Left ventricular midwall fibrosis as a predictor of mortality and morbidity after cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60: 1659-1667
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lurz P, Eitel I, Adam J et al. Diagnostic performance of CMR imaging compared with EMB in patients with suspected myocarditis. JACC Cardiovascular imaging 2012; 5: 513-524
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Mahrholdt H, Goedecke C, Wagner A et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of human myocarditis: a comparison to histology and molecular pathology. Circulation 2004; 109: 1250-1258
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Pennell DJ, Porter JB, Cappellini MD et al. Deferasirox for up to 3 years leads to continued improvement of myocardial T2* in patients with beta-thalassemia major. Haematologica 2012; 97: 842-848
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Romero J, Xue X, Gonzalez W et al. CMR imaging assessing viability in patients with chronic ventricular dysfunction due to coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of prospective trials. JACC Cardiovascular imaging 2012; 5: 494-508
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Schwitter J, Wacker CM, van Rossum AC et al. MR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial. Europ Heart J 2008; 29: 480-489
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Schwitter J, Wacker CM, Wilke N et al. MR-IMPACT II: Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary artery disease Trial: perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparative multicentre, multivendor trial. Europ Heart J 2012 Mar 4. [Epub ahead of print]
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Schwitter J, Wacker CM, Wilke N et al. Superior diagnostic performance of perfusion-cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus SPECT to detect coronary artery disease: The secondary endpoints of the multicenter multivendor MR-IMPACT II (Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary Artery Disease Trial). J Cardiovasc Magnet Res 2012; 14: 61
    Google Scholar