Download PDF
Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2014; 35(01): 041-049
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1363450
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Acute Pulmonary Embolism: From Morphology to Function

John Mayo
1   Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
2   Vancouver Coastal Health Authority, Vancouver, Canada
,
Yogesh Thakur
1   Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
2   Vancouver Coastal Health Authority, Vancouver, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
30 January 2014 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

This article reviews the current diagnostic strategies for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) focusing on the current first choice imaging modality, computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA). Diagnostic strengths and weaknesses and associated cost-effectiveness of the diagnostic pathways will be discussed. The radiation dose risk of these pathways will be described and techniques to minimize dose will be reviewed. Finally the impact of new dual energy applications which have the potential to provide additional functional information will be briefly reviewed. Imaging plays a vital role in the diagnostic pathway for clinically suspected PE. CT has been established as the most robust morphologic imaging tool for the evaluation of patients with suspected PE. This conclusion is based on the high diagnostic utility of CT for the detection of PE and its unique capacity for accurate diagnosis of conditions that can mimic the clinical presentation of PE. Although current cost-effectiveness evaluations have established CT as integral in the PE diagnostic pathway, failure to acknowledge the impact of alternate diagnosis represents a current knowledge gap. The emerging dual energy capacity of current CT scanners offers the potential to evaluate both pulmonary vascular morphology and ventilation perfusion relationships within the lung parenchyma at high spatial resolution. This dual assessment of lung morphology and lung function at low (< 5 millisievert) radiation dose represents a substantial advance in PE imaging.

Keywords

CTPA - pulmonary embolism - acute PE - dual-energy CT - thoracic CT
 

  • References

  • 1 Burns SK, Haramati LB. Diagnostic imaging and risk stratification of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Cardiol Rev 2012; 20 (1) 15-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Kline JA, Mitchell AM, Kabrhel C, Richman PB, Courtney DM. Clinical criteria to prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 2 (8) 1247-1255
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Wells PS, Ginsberg JS, Anderson DR , et al. Use of a clinical model for safe management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129 (12) 997-1005
    Google Scholar
  • 4 American College of Emergency Physicians Clinical Policies Committee; Clinical Policies Committee Subcommittee on Suspected Pulmonary Embolism. Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Emerg Med 2003; 41 (2) 257-270
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Prologo JD, Gilkeson RC, Diaz M, Asaad J. CT pulmonary angiography: a comparative analysis of the utilization patterns in emergency department and hospitalized patients between 1998 and 2003. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183 (4) 1093-1096
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bettmann MA, Baginski SG, White RD , et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® acute chest pain—suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thorac Imaging 2012; 27 (2) W28-W31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Schoepf UJ, Costello P. CT angiography for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: state of the art. Radiology 2004; 230 (2) 329-337
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Sadigh G, Kelly AM, Cronin P. Challenges, controversies, and hot topics in pulmonary embolism imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196 (3) 497-515
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Miles S, Rogers KM, Thomas P , et al. A comparison of single-photon emission CT lung scintigraphy and CT pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Chest 2009; 136 (6) 1546-1553
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Gutte H, Mortensen J, Jensen CV , et al. Detection of pulmonary embolism with combined ventilation-perfusion SPECT and low-dose CT: head-to-head comparison with multidetector CT angiography. J Nucl Med 2009; 50 (12) 1987-1992
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Niemann T, Egelhof T, Bongartz G. Transthoracic sonography for the detection of pulmonary embolism—a meta-analysis. Ultraschall Med 2009; 30 (2) 150-156
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Remy-Jardin M, Pistolesi M, Goodman LR , et al. Management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism in the era of CT angiography: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 2007; 245 (2) 315-329
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Mayo J, Thakur Y. Pulmonary CT angiography as first-line imaging for PE: image quality and radiation dose considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200 (3) 522-528
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kim KI, Müller NL, Mayo JR. Clinically suspected pulmonary embolism: utility of spiral CT. Radiology 1999; 210 (3) 693-697
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Bettmann MA, Baginski SG, White RD , et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Acute Chest Pain–Suspected Pulmonary Embolism. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2011
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Raymakers AJ, Mayo J, Marra CA, Fitzgerald M. Diagnostic strategies incorporating computed tomography angiography for pulmonary embolism: a systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses. J Thorac Imaging 2013; ; [Epub July 9, 2013]
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 O'Neill J, Murchison JT, Wright L, Williams J. Effect of the introduction of helical CT on radiation dose in the investigation of pulmonary embolism. Br J Radiol 2005; 78 (925) 46-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, BEIR VII Phase 2. Washington, DC: National Research Council; 2006
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Mettler Jr FA, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K , et al. Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources—1950-2007. Radiology 2009; 253 (2) 520-531
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Chartrand-Lefebvre C, White CS, Bhalla S , et al. Comparison of the effect of low- and iso-osmolar contrast agents on heart rate during chest CT angiography: results of a prospective randomized multicenter study. Radiology 2011; 258 (3) 930-937
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Holmquist F, Hansson K, Pasquariello F, Björk J, Nyman U. Minimizing contrast medium doses to diagnose pulmonary embolism with 80-kVp multidetector computed tomography in azotemic patients. Acta Radiol 2009; 50 (2) 181-193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Keil S, Plumhans C, Behrendt FF , et al. MDCT angiography of the pulmonary arteries: intravascular contrast enhancement does not depend on iodine concentration when injecting equal amounts of iodine at standardized iodine delivery rates. Eur Radiol 2008; 18 (8) 1690-1695
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Ramadan SU, Kosar P, Sonmez I, Karahan S, Kosar U. Optimisation of contrast medium volume and injection-related factors in CT pulmonary angiography: 64-slice CT study. Eur Radiol 2010; 20 (9) 2100-2107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Lell M, Hinkmann F, Anders K , et al. High-pitch electrocardiogram-triggered computed tomography of the chest: initial results. Invest Radiol 2009; 44 (11) 728-733
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Tacelli N, Darchis C, Pontana F , et al. High-pitch, Dual-source Chest Computed Tomography Angiography Without Electrocardiographic Synchronization: Evaluation of Cardiac Motion Artifacts on Pulmonary Circulation. J Thorac Imaging 2013; 28 (6) 376-382
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Little MP, Wakeford R, Tawn EJ, Bouffler SD, Berrington de Gonzalez A. Risks associated with low doses and low dose rates of ionizing radiation: why linearity may be (almost) the best we can do. Radiology 2009; 251 (1) 6-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Tubiana M, Feinendegen LE, Yang C, Kaminski JM. The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data. Radiology 2009; 251 (1) 13-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Woo JK, Chiu RY, Thakur Y, Mayo JR. Risk-benefit analysis of pulmonary CT angiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolus. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198 (6) 1332-1339
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Mayo JR, Aldrich J, Muller NL ; Fleischner Society. Radiation exposure at chest CT: a statement of the Fleischner Society. Radiology 2003; 228 (1) 15-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Brenner DJ. Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer. Radiology 2004; 231 (2) 440-445
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Vollmar SV, Kalender WA. Reduction of dose to the female breast in thoracic CT: a comparison of standard-protocol, bismuth-shielded, partial and tube-current-modulated CT examinations. Eur Radiol 2008; 18 (8) 1674-1682
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Duan X, Wang J, Christner JA, Leng S, Grant KL, McCollough CH. Dose reduction to anterior surfaces with organ-based tube-current modulation: evaluation of performance in a phantom study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197 (3) 689-695
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 AAPM Position Statement on the Use of Bismuth Shielding for the Purpose of Dose Reduction in CT Scanning. Policy no. PP-26-A; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Primak AN, Giraldo JC, Eusemann CD , et al. Dual-source dual-energy CT with additional tin filtration: Dose and image quality evaluation in phantoms and in vivo. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 195 (5) 1164-1174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Lu GM, Zhao Y, Zhang LJ, Schoepf UJ. Dual-energy CT of the lung. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199 (5, Suppl): S40-S53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Zhang LJ, Zhou CS, Schoepf UJ , et al. Dual-energy CT lung ventilation/perfusion imaging for diagnosing pulmonary embolism. Eur Radiol 2013; 23 (10) 2666-2675
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Sangwaiya MJ, Kalra MK, Sharma A, Halpern EF, Shepard JA, Digumarthy SR. Dual-energy computed tomographic pulmonary angiography: a pilot study to assess the effect on image quality and diagnostic confidence. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2010; 34 (1) 46-51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Schenzle JC, Sommer WH, Neumaier K , et al. Dual energy CT of the chest: how about the dose?. Invest Radiol 2010; 45 (6) 347-353
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Yuan R, Shuman WP, Earls JP , et al. Reduced iodine load at CT pulmonary angiography with dual-energy monochromatic imaging: comparison with standard CT pulmonary angiography—a prospective randomized trial. Radiology 2012; 262 (1) 290-297
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Kaza RK, Platt JF, Cohan RH, Caoili EM, Al-Hawary MM, Wasnik A. Dual-energy CT with single- and dual-source scanners: current applications in evaluating the genitourinary tract. Radiographics 2012; 32 (2) 353-369
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar