Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1791807
JAAA CEU Program
The questions on this page refer to Baiduc et al, “Hearing Loss and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Profiles: Data from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos,” pages 445–459.
Learner Outcomes:
Readers of this article should be able to:
-
Demonstrate understanding of the cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk-burden scheme used in this study.
-
Determine significant associations between CVD risk factors and hearing loss specific to the Hispanic/Latino population.
#
CEU Questions:
-
Why is it important from clinical and public health standpoints to evaluate the association between cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and hearing loss specifically in the Hispanic/Latino population?
-
Few previous studies included Hispanics/Latinos in their assessments of CVD risk factors and hearing loss.
-
Hispanics/Latinos have a low prevalence of CVD but a high prevalence of hearing loss.
-
CVD is a rare cause of mortality among Hispanics/Latinos.
-
-
Statistical analysis was performed:
-
Prospectively
-
Retrospectively
-
Cross-sectionally
-
-
This study characterized CVD risk:
-
Using a binary CVD definition (low vs. high risk)
-
In terms of five individual CVD risk factors
-
Using four individual CVD risk factors to define five CVD risk strata
-
-
Consider the study definitions of CVD risk and the following participant profile: female, 55 years old, nonsmoker, type II diabetes, blood pressure 141/92 mmHg, and total cholesterol 160 mg/dL. Which CVD risk stratum fits this profile?
-
Lowest risk (optimal)
-
Exactly one major risk factor
-
Two or more major risk factors
-
-
Why were individuals with significant air-bone gaps excluded from analysis?
-
Because they had suspected sensory/neural pathology and this study was focused on conductive hearing loss
-
Because they had suspected conductive pathology and this study was focused on sensorineural hearing loss
-
They were not excluded.
-
-
In this study, for some analyses, hearing loss was treated:
-
Categorically using four categories (i.e., none, mild, moderate, severe)
-
Continuously (i.e., threshold from 0.5 to 8 kHz)
-
Dichotomously (i.e., yes/no) based on self-report
-
-
Which statement is true regarding the logistic regression analysis?
-
The analysis was adjusted only for age, sex, and education.
-
The analysis was sex-stratified,
-
The analysis did not account for sampling weights.
-
-
Among males younger than 45 years of age,
-
There was not a significant association between overall CVD risk and hearing loss.
-
Having elevated blood pressure was associated with higher odds of hearing loss.
-
Having diabetes was associated with higher odds of hearing loss.
-
-
Consider males and females 45 years of age or older. Regarding the association between CVD risk burden and hearing loss,
-
Males and females with two or more major CVD risk factors had significantly increased odds of hearing loss compared to those with all CVD risk factors optimal.
-
Males with one major CVD risk factor had significantly increased odds of hearing loss compared to males with all CVD risk factors optimal.
-
Females with two or more major CVD risk factors had significantly increased odds of hearing loss compared to females with all CVD risk factors optimal.
-
-
Generally,
-
Hearing thresholds improved with increased CVD risk burden, especially for persons less than 45 years of age.
-
Hearing thresholds declined as CVD risk burden increased, most notably for persons in the older age group.
-
Hearing thresholds were approximately the same regardless of CVD risk group for persons 45 years of age or older.
-
#
Publication History
Article published online:
04 October 2024
© 2022. American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA