Comparison of Scientific Calipers and Computer-Enabled CT Review for the Measurement of Skull Base and Craniomaxillofacial Dimensions

ABSTRACT

Traditionally, cadaveric studies and plain-film cephalometrics provided information about craniomaxillofacial proportions and measurements; however, advances in computer technology now permit software-based review of computed tomography (CT)-based models. Distances between standardized anatomic points were measured on five dried human skulls with standard scientific calipers (Geneva Gauge, Albany, NY) and through computer workstation (StealthStation 2.6.4, Medtronic Surgical Navigation Technology, Louisville, CO) review of corresponding CT scans. Differences in measurements between the caliper and CT model were not statistically significant for each parameter. Measurements obtained by computer workstation CT review of the cranial skull base are an accurate representation of actual bony anatomy. Such information has important implications for surgical planning and clinical research.

KEYWORD

Computer-aided surgery - 3D CT model - cephalometrics

REFERENCES

• 1 Zide B, Grayson B, McCarthy J G. Cephalometric analysis. Part I.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1981;  68 816-823
• 2 Zide B, Grayson B, McCarthy J G. Cephalometric analysis for upper and lower midface surgery. Part II.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1981;  68 961-968
• 3 Zide B, Grayson B, McCarthy J G. Cephalometric analysis for mandibular surgery. Part III.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1982;  69 155-164
• 4 Kragskov J, Sindet-Pdersen S, Gyldensted C, Jensen K L. A comparison of three-dimensional computed tomography scans and stereolithographic models for evaluation of craniofacial anomalies.  J Oral Maxillofac Surg . 1996;  54 402-411
• 5 Sejrsen B, Jakobsen J, Skovgaard L T, Kjaer I. Growth in the external cranial base evaluated on human dry skulls, using nerve canal openings as reference.  Acta Odontol Scand . 1997;  55 356-364
• 6 Fialkov J A, Phillips J H, Gruss J S. A stereotactic system for guiding complex craniofacial reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1992;  89 340-345
• 7 Demianczuk A NA, Antonyshyun O M. Application of a three-dimensional intraoperative navigation system to craniofacial surgery.  J Craniofac Surg . 1997;  8 290-297
• 8 Marmulla R, Niederellmann. Computer-assisted bone segment navigation.  J Craniomaxillofac Surg . 1998;  26 347-359
• 9 Cutting C, Grayson B, McCarthy J G. A virtual reality system for bone fragment positioning in craniofacial surgical procedures.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1998;  102 2436-2443
• 10 Richardson A. An investigation into the reproducibility of some points, planes and lines used in cephalometric analysis.  Am J Orthodont . 1966;  52 637-651
• 11 Baumrind S, Frantz R C. The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification.  Am J Orthodont . 1971;  60 111-127
• 12 Baumrind S, Frantz R C. The reliability of head film measurements. 2. Conventional angular and linear measurements.  Am J Orthodont . 1971;  60 505-517
• 13 Thurow R C. Cephalometric methods in research and private practice.  Angle Orthodont . 1951;  21 104-116
• 14 Hall D L, Bollen A-M. A comparison of sonically derived and traditional cephalometric values.  Angle Orthodont . 1996;  67 365-372