PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2018; 06(08): E961-E968
DOI: 10.1055/a-0602-4065
Original article
Owner and Copyright © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018

Endoscopic submucosal dissection of malignant non-pedunculated colorectal lesions

Carl-Fredrik Rönnow
1   Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Section of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
,
Jacob Elebro
2   Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Section of Pathology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
,
Ervin Toth
3   Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Section of Gastroenterology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
,
Henrik Thorlacius
1   Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Section of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

submitted 05. Dezember 2017

accepted after revision 12. März 2018

Publikationsdatum:
01. August 2018 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background and study aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an established method for en bloc resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal lesions in Asia but dissemination of ESD in Western countries is limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of ESD in the management of malignant non-pedunculated colorectal lesions in a European center.

Patients and methods Among 255 patients undergoing colorectal ESD between 2014 and 2016, 29 cases were identified as submucosal invasive cancers and included in this study. The main outcomes were en bloc, R0 and curative resection as well as procedural time, complications and recurrence.

Results Median tumor size was 40 mm (range 20 – 70 mm). Thirteen cancers were located in the colon and 16 were located in the rectum. Procedural time was 89 minutes (range 18 – 594 minutes). Complete resection was achieved in 28 cases, en bloc and R0 resection rates were 83 % and 69 %, respectively. Curative resection rate was 38 %. One case had a perforation in the sigmoid colon requiring emergency surgery. No significant bleeding occurred. Six patients underwent additional surgery after ESD, one of whom had residual tumor. One recurrence was detected in 20 patients that were followed-up endoscopically, median follow-up time was 13 months (range 2 – 30 months).

Conclusion ESD seems to be a safe and effective method for treating non-pedunculated malignant colorectal lesions after careful patient selection and proper endoscopic training.

 

  • References

  • 1 American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2012.
    PubMed
  • 2 Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN. et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1977-1981
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ. et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 687-696
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Backes Y, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, van Bergeijk J. et al. Risk for incomplete resection after macroscopic radical endoscopic resection of t1 colorectal cancer: a multicenter cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol 2017; 112: 785-796
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Yoda Y, Ikematsu H, Matsuda T. et al. A large-scale multicenter study of long-term outcomes after endoscopic resection for submucosal invasive colorectal cancer. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 718-724
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Bartel MJ, Brahmbhatt BS, Wallace MB. Management of colorectal T1 carcinoma treated by endoscopic resection from the Western perspective. Dig Endosc 2016; 28: 330-341
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Pimentel-Nunes P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Ponchon T. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 829-854
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Repici A, Hassan C, De Paula Pessoa D. et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 137-150
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Saito Y, Uraoka T, Yamaguchi Y. et al. A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 1217-1225
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Lee EJ, Lee JB, Lee SH. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors – 1,000 colorectal ESD cases: one specialized institute's experiences. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 31-39
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Ono H, Kondo H, Gotoda T. et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of early gastric cancer. Gut 2001; 48: 225-229
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Yamada M, Saito Y, Takamaru H. et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms in 423 cases: a retrospective study. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 233-242
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Probst A, Ebigbo A, Markl B. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early rectal neoplasia: experience from a European center. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 222-232
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 [Anonymous] The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: S3-43
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Hayashi N, Tanaka S, Hewett DG. et al. Endoscopic prediction of deep submucosal invasive carcinoma: validation of the narrow-band imaging international colorectal endoscopic (NICE) classification. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 625-632
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Thorlacius H, Uedo N, Toth E. Implementation of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early colorectal neoplasms in Sweden. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2013; 2013: 758202
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y. et al. The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut 2000; 47: 251-255
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Dixon MF. Gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia: Vienna revisited. Gut 2002; 51: 130-131
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205-213
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Saito Y, Fujii T, Kondo H. et al. Endoscopic treatment for laterally spreading tumors in the colon. Endoscopy 2001; 33: 682-686
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Kaminski MF, Hassan C, Bisschops R. et al. Advanced imaging for detection and differentiation of colorectal neoplasia: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 435-449
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Gondal G, Grotmol T, Hofstad B. et al. Biopsy of colorectal polyps is not adequate for grading of neoplasia. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 1193-1197
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Absar MS, Haboubi NY. Colonic neoplastic polyps: biopsy is not efficient to exclude malignancy. The Trafford experience. Tech Coloproctol 2004; 8 (Suppl. 02) s257-260
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Bipat S, Glas AS, Slors FJ. et al. Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging – a meta-analysis. Radiology 2004; 232: 773-783
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Lutz MP, Zalcberg JR, Glynne-Jones R. et al. Second St. Gallen European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Cancer Conference: consensus recommendations on controversial issues in the primary treatment of rectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 2016; 63: 11-24
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Yamada T, Shimura T, Ebi M. et al. Subset analysis of a multicenter, randomized controlled trial to compare magnifying chromoendoscopy with endoscopic ultrasonography for stage diagnosis of early stage colorectal cancer. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0134942
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Sauer M, Hildenbrand R, Oyama T. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for flat or sessile colorectal neoplasia > 20 mm: A European single-center series of 182 cases. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4: E895-E900
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Saunders BP, Tsiamoulos ZP. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection of large colonic polyps. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 13: 486-4966
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Neuhaus H. ESD around the world: Europe. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2014; 24: 295-311
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Fuccio L, Hassan C, Ponchon T. et al. Clinical outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 86: 74-86 e17
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. Endoscopic resection of colorectal lesions: The narrowing divide between East and West. Dig Endosc 2016; 28: 296-305
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Bialek A, Pertkiewicz J, Karpinska K. et al. Treatment of large colorectal neoplasms by endoscopic submucosal dissection: a European single-center study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 26: 607-615
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Asayama N, Oka S, Tanaka S. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection as total excisional biopsy for clinical T1 colorectal carcinoma. Digestion 2015; 91: 64-69
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Tanaka S, Oka S, Kaneko I. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: possibility of standardization. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 100-107
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Tamaru Y, Oka S, Tanaka S. et al. Long-term outcomes after treatment for T1 colorectal carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective cohort study of Hiroshima GI Endoscopy Research Group. J Gastroenterol 2017; 52: 1169-1179
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Rickert A, Aliyev R, Belle S. et al. Oncologic colorectal resection after endoscopic treatment of malignant polyps: does endoscopy have an adverse effect on oncologic and surgical outcomes?. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 951-960
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar