Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2020; 08(12): E1759-E1764
DOI: 10.1055/a-1261-9605
Review

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review of the literature

Nicola Imperatore
1   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, AORN A Cardarelli, Naples, Italy
2   Gastroenterology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
,
Germana de Nucci
3   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese, Milan, Italy
,
Enzo Domenico Mandelli
3   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese, Milan, Italy
,
Annalisa de Leone
1   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, AORN A Cardarelli, Naples, Italy
,
Francesco Paolo Zito
1   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, AORN A Cardarelli, Naples, Italy
,
Giovanni Lombardi
1   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, AORN A Cardarelli, Naples, Italy
,
Gianpiero Manes
3   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese, Milan, Italy
› Institutsangaben
Preview

Abstract

Background and study aims Surgery is the mainstay therapy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (P-NETs), but it is associated with significant adverse events (AEs). In recent years, endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) has been described for treating P-NETs. We performed a systematic literature review aimed at exploring the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of EUS-RFA in treatment of P-NETs.

Methods The literature review was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and SCOPUS to identify all case reports of EUS-RFA for treatment of P-NETs.

Results Sixyt-one patients (males 49.2 %, mean age 64.5 years) and 73 tumors (mean size 16 mm, insulinomas 30.1 %) treated with EUS-RFA were included from 12 studies. The overall effectiveness of EUS-RFA was 96 % (75 % – 100 %) without differences between functional vs. non-functional P-NETs (P = 0.3) and without relevant issues about safety (mild AEs 13.7 %). While tumor location was not predictive for incomplete/non-response to EUS-RFA, greater tumor dimensions predicted treatment failure (21.8 ± 4.71 mm in the non-response group vs 15.07 ± 7.34 mm in the response group, P = 0.048). At ROC analysis, a P-NET size cut-off value ≤18 mm predicted response to treatment, with a sensitivity of 80 % (95 % CI 28.4 % – 99.5 %), a specificity of 78.6 % (95 % CI 63.2 % – 89.7 %), a positive predictive value of 97.1 % (95 % CI 84.7 % – 99.9 %) and a negative predictive value of 30.8 % (95 % CI 9.1 % – 61.4 %), with an area under the curve of 0.81 (95 % CI 0.67 – 0.95).

Conclusions EUS-RFA is safe and effective for treating P-NETs. It may be reasonable to consider EUS-RFA for small P-NETs, irrespective of the functional status.



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 05. Juni 2020

Angenommen: 18. August 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
17. November 2020

© 2020. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany