Subscribe to RSS
Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00000083.xml
Synlett 2021; 32(08): 829-832
DOI: 10.1055/a-1380-6436
DOI: 10.1055/a-1380-6436
letter
Organocatalyzed Asymmetric Aldol Reaction of α-Keto Amides with A Tripeptide Catalyst
This work was supported by the Sasakawa Scientific Research Grant (2020-3029) from The Japan Science Society.
Abstract
An organocatalyzed asymmetric aldol reaction of α-keto amides was developed. An N-terminal 4-trans-siloxyproline-based tripeptide with an l-tert-leucine unit adjacent to the 4-trans-siloxyproline residue was used to catalyze the reaction between various α-keto amides and acetone, to produce the corresponding aldol adducts with up to 99% yield and 91% ee.
Key words
aldol reaction - asymmetric catalysis - peptide catalysis - organocatalysis - keto amides - hydroxy amidesSupporting Information
- Supporting information for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1380-6436.
- Supporting Information
Publication History
Received: 28 December 2020
Accepted after revision: 02 February 2021
Accepted Manuscript online:
02 February 2021
Article published online:
12 February 2021
© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References and Notes
- 1a Schneider CH, Kasper MF, De Weck AL, Rolli H, Angst BD. Allergy 1987; 42: 597
- 1b Matumoto N, Momose I, Umekita M, Kinoshita N, Chino M, Iinuma H, Sawa T, Hamada M, Takeuchi T. J. Antibiot. 1998; 51: 1087
- 1c Lu S.-H, Yamagata T, Atuki K, Sun L, Smith CP, Yoshimura N, Chancellor MB, De Groat WC. Brain Res. 2002; 946: 72
- 1d Schäcke H, Schottelius A, Döcke W.-D, Strehlke P, Jaroch S, Schmees N, Rewinkel H, Hennekes H, Asadullah K. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004; 101: 227
- 1e Oku N, Krishnamoorthy R, Benson AG, Ferguson RL, Lipton MA, Phillips LR, Gustafson KR, McMahon JB. J. Org. Chem. 2005; 70: 6842
- 1f Cantarini M, Fuhr R, Morris T. Pharmacol. 2006; 77: 171
- 1g Xie W, Ding D, Zi W, Li G, Ma D. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008; 47: 2844
- 1h Lu Z, Van Wagoner RM, Harper MK, Baker HL, Hooper JN. A, Bewley CA, Ireland CM. J. Nat. Prod. 2011; 74: 185
- 2a Brandão P, Burke AJ. Tetrahedron 2018; 74: 4927
- 2b Yu B, Xing H, Yu D.-Q, Liu H.-M. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2016; 12: 1000
- 2c Kumar A, Chimni SS. RSC Adv. 2012; 2: 9748
- 3a Di Sanza R, Nguyen TL. N, Iqbal N, Argent SP, Lewis W, Lam HW. Chem. Sci. 2020; 11: 2401
- 3b Xia A.-B, Pan G.-J, Wu C, Liu X.-L, Zhang X.-L, Li Z.-B, Du X.-H, Xu D.-Q. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2016; 358: 3155
- 3c Ishida N, Nečas D, Masuda Y, Murakami M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 127: 7526
- 3d Hatano M, Nishimura T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 10949
- 3e Wang L, Ni Q, Blümel M, Shu T, Raabe G, Enders D. Chem. Eur. J. 2015; 21: 8033
- 3f Joie C, Deckers K, Raabe G, Ender D. Synthesis 2014; 46: 1539
- 3g Joie C, Deckers K, Enders D. Synthesis 2014; 49: 799
- 3h Goudedranche S, Pierrot D, Constantieux T, Bonne D, Rodriguez J. Chem. Commun. 2014; 50: 15605
- 3i Shirai T, Ito H, Yamamoto Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 2658
- 3j Raimondi W, del Mar Sanchez Duque M, Goudedranche S, Quintard A, Constantieux T, Bugaut X, Bonne D, Rodriguez J. Synthesis 2013; 1659
- 3k Yin L, Kanai M, Shibasaki M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 7620
- 4a Guo Y.-J, Guo X, Kong D.-Z, Lu H.-J, Liu L.-T, Hua Y.-Z, Wang M.-C. J. Org. Chem. 2020; 85: 4195
- 4b Yang X.-C, Liu M.-M, Mathey F, Yang H, Hua Y.-Z, Wang M.-C. J. Org. Chem. 2019; 84: 7762
- 4c Liu M.-M, Yang X.-C, Hua Y.-Z, Chang J.-B, Wang M.-C. Org. Lett. 2019; 21: 2111
- 4d Yao Q, Yu H, Zhang H, Dong S, Chang F, Lin L, Liu X, Feng X. Chem. Commun. 2018; 54: 3375
- 4e Lefranc A, Guénée L, Contal SG, Alexakis A. Synlett 2014; 25: 2947
- 4f Evans DA, Olhava EJ, Johnson JS, Janey JM. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998; 37: 3372
- 5a Luo W, Zhao J, Ji J, Lin L, Liu X, Mei H, Feng X. Chem. Commun. 2015; 51: 10042
- 5b Xu H, Wolf C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 12249
- 6a Kon K, Kohari Y, Murata M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2019; 60: 415
- 6b Kon K, Kohari Y, Murata M. Heterocycles 2019; 99: 841
- 6c Kon K, Takai H, Kohari Y, Murata M. Catalysts 2019; 9: 514
- 7 List B, Lerner RA, Barbas CF. III. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000; 122: 2395
-
8
Aldol Products 4a–h; General Procedure
A mixture of 1d (20 μmol, 10.7 mg), MeOH (0.1 mL), and acetone (3; 2 mmol, 0.15 mL) was stirred at –40 °C for 10 min. The appropriate α-keto amide 2 (0.1 mmol) was added, and the mixture was stirred at –40 °C for 5 d then concentrated under reduced pressure. The aldol product was purified by column chromatography (silica gel, hexane–EtOAc). The enantiomeric excess of the aldol adduct was determined by chiral HPLC.
2-Hydroxy-N-methyl-4-oxo-2-phenylpentanamide (4a)
White solid, 20.8 mg (94%, 91% ee); mp 71–73 °C; [α]D
23 +169.4 (c = 0.13, CHCl3). HPLC [Daicel CHIRALPAK AD-H, hexane–i-PrOH (90:10), 1.0 mL/min, 254 nm, 35 °C]: t
R (minor) = 10.9 min; t
R (major) = 12.3 min. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.59–7.57 (m, 2 H), 7.37–7.32 (m, 2 H), 7.28 (tt, J = 7.3, 1.5 Hz, 1 H), 6.78 (br s, 1 H), 5.34 (s, 1 H), 3.67 (d, J = 17.6 Hz, 1 H), 2.79 (d, J = 17.6 Hz, 1 H), 2.76 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 3 H), 2.24 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 212.2, 174.1, 141.3, 128.4, 127.8, 124.4, 78.2, 50.8, 31.3, 26.1. HRMS (EI): m/z [M+] calcd for C12H15NO3: 221.1052; found: 221.1029.
For selected reviews, see:
For reactions using α-keto amides as substrates, see:
For reactions using β,γ-unsaturated α-keto amides as substrates, see: