Int J Sports Med 2011; 32(7): 546-551
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1273688
Orthopedics & Biomechanics

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Biomechanical Analysis of Backstroke Swimming Starts

K. de Jesus1 , K. de Jesus1 , P. Figueiredo1 , 2 , P. Gonçalves1 , 2 , S. Pereira3 , J. P. Vilas-Boas1 , 2 , R. J. Fernandes1 , 2
  • 1Faculty of Sport, Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport, University of Porto, Portugal
  • 2Porto Biomechanics Laboratory, University of Porto, Portugal
  • 3State University of Santa Catarina, Sport, Florianópolis, Brazil
Further Information

Publication History

accepted after revision January 25, 2011

Publication Date:
11 May 2011 (online)

Abstract

The relationships between the start time and kinematic, kinetic and electromyographic data were examined in order to establish the common features of an effective backstroke swimming start. Complementarily, different starting positions were analysed to identify the parameters that account for the fastest backstroke start time under different constraints. 6 high-level swimmers performed 4×15 m maximal trials of each start variants with different feet position: parallel and entirely submerged (BSFI) and above water surface (BSFE), being monitored with synchronized dual-media image, underwater platform plus handgrip with a load cell, and eletromyographic signal of Rectus Femoris and Gastrocnemius Medialis. Mean and SD values of start time for BSFI and BSFE were 2.03±0.19 and 2.14±0.36 s, respectively. In both starts, high associations (r>=0.75, p<0.001) were observed between start time and centre of mass resultant average velocity at glide phase and horizontal impulse at take-off for BSFI, and centre of mass horizontal position at the start signal for BSFE. It was concluded that the greater impulse during the take-off and its transformation into a fast underwater movement are determinant to decrease the start time at BSFI. Regarding BSFE, a greater centre of mass pool-wall approximation might imply a flatter take-off angle, compromising underwater velocity and starting performance.

References

  • 1 Abdel-Aziz YI, Karara HM. Direct linear transformation from comparator coordinates into object space coordinates in close range photogrammetry. In: Proceedings of the American Society of Photogrammetry Symposium on Close Range Photogrammetry. 1971: 1-18
  • 2 Araujo L, Pereira S, Gatti R, Freitas E, Jacomel G, Roesler H, Vilas-Boas JP. Analysis of the lateral push-off in the freestyle flip turn.  J Sports Sci. 2010;  28 1175-1181
  • 3 Arellano R. Hydrodynamics of swimming propulsion. In: Sidney M, Potdevin F, Pelayo P (eds). IV Journées Spécialisées de Natation. Lille: Université de Lille; 2008: 21-35
  • 4 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for accessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.  Lancet. 1986;  1 307-310
  • 5 Breed R, McElroy G. A biomechanical comparison of the grab, swing and track start in swimming.  J Hum Mov Studies. 2000;  39 277-293
  • 6 Clarys JP, Cabri J. Eletromyography and the study of sports movements: a review.  J Sports Sci. 1993;  11 379-448
  • 7 de Jesus K, de Jesus K, Figueiredo P, Gonçalves P, Pereira P, Vilas-Boas JP, Fernandes RJ. Biomechanical characterization of the backstroke start in immerged and emerged feet conditions. In: Kjendlie P-L, Stallman RK, Cabri J (eds). Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming XI. Oslo: Norwegian School of Sport Science; 2010: 64-66
  • 8 De Leva P. Adjustments to Zatsiorsky-Seluyanov's segment inertia parameters.  J Biomech. 1996;  29 1223-1230
  • 9 FINA. . Federation International de Natation, Swimming rules.  Retrieved from http://www.fina.org 2010; 
  • 10 Galbraith H, Scurr J, Hencken C, Wood L, Graham-Smith P. Biomechanical comparison of the track start and the modified one-handed track start in competitive swimming: an interventional study.  J App Biomech. 2008;  24 307-315
  • 11 Ganter N, Witte K, Edelmann-Nusser J, Heller M, Schwab K, Witte H. Spectral parameters of surface electromyography and performance in swim bench exercises during the training of elite and juniors swimmers.  Eur J Sports Sci. 2007;  7 143-155
  • 12 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. International Journal of Sports Medicine – Ethical Standards in Sport and Exercise Science Research.  Int J Sports Med. 2009;  30 701-702
  • 13 Hay JG. The status of research on biomechanics of swimming. In: Hay JG (ed). Starting, Stroking and Turning. Iowa: University of Iowa; 1986: 53-76
  • 14 Hay JG, Guimarães ACS. A quantitative look at swimming biomechanics. In: Hay JG (ed). Swim Tech. 1986 20: 11-17
  • 15 Hohmann A, Fehr U, Kirsten R, Krueger T. Biomechanical analysis of the backstroke start technique in swimming.  E-Journal Bewegung und Training. 2008;  2 28-33
  • 16 Holthe M, McLean SP. Kinematic comparison of grab and track starts in swimming. In: Blackwell JR, Sanders RH (eds). XIX International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports. San Francisco: ISBS; 2001: 31-33
  • 17 Houel N, Rey JL, Lecat S, Hellard P. Kinematic modelling of swimmers’ impulse and flight phases during a grab start. In: Chatard JC (ed). Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming IX. Saint Etienne: University of Saint Etienne; 2003: 93-95
  • 18 Krüger T, Hohmann A, Kirsten R, Wick D. Kinematics and dynamics of backstroke start. In: Vilas Boas JP, Alves F, Marques A (eds). Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming X. Porto: Port J Sport Sci; 2006: 58-60
  • 19 Lyttle AD, Benjanuvatra N. Start right? A biomechanical review of dive start performance 2005.  Available: http://coachesinfo.com/category/swimming/321
  • 20 Oliveira N, Fernandes RJ, Sarmento M, Liberal S. Muscle activity during the typical water polo eggbeater kick.  Int J Aquat Res. 2010;  4 163-174
  • 21 Pearson CT, McElroy GK, Blitvich JD, Subic A, Blanksby BA. A comparison of the swimming start using traditional and modified starting blocks.  J Hum Mov Stud. 1998;  34 49-66
  • 22 Pereira S, Ruschel C, Araújo L. Biomechanical analysis of the underwater phase in swimming start. In: Vilas Boas JP, Alves F, Marques A (eds). Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming X. Porto: Port J Sport Sci; 2006: 79-81
  • 23 Theuth KM, Jensen RL. A comparison of two backstroke starts. In: Schwameder H, Strutzenberger G,Fastenbauer V, Lindinger S, Muller E (eds). XXIV International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports. Salzburg: ISBS; 2006: 1-5
  • 24 Vantorre J, Seifert L, Fernandes RJ, Vilas-Boas JP, Chollet D. Kinematical profiling of the front crawl start.  Int J Sports Med. 2010;  31 16-21
  • 25 Vantorre J, Seifert L, Fernandes RJ, Vilas-Boas JP, Chollet D. Comparison of grab start between elite and trained swimmers.  Int J Sports Med. 2010;  31 887-893
  • 26 Vilas-Boas JP. Speed fluctuations and energy cost with different breastroke techniques. In:, Troup J,, Hollander AP,, Strass D, eds). Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming VIII. London: E and FN SPON; 1996: 167-171
  • 27 Vilas-Boas JP, Cruz MJ, Sousa F, Conceição F, Fernandes RJ, Carvalho J. Biomechanical analysis of ventral swimming starts: Comparison of the grab start with two track start techniques. In:, Chatard JC, (ed). Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming IX. Saint Etienne: University of Saint Etienne; 2003: 249-253
  • 28 Wilson BD, Howard A. The use of cluster analysis in movement description and classification of the backstroke swim start. In:, Matsui H,, Kobayashi K, (eds). Biomechanics VIII-B. Human Kinetics Publisher; 1983: 1223-1230
  • 29 Winter D. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement. New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2005
  • 30 Zatsiorsky VM, Bulgakova NZ, Chaplinsky NM. Biomechanical analysis of starting techniques in swimming. In:, Terauds J,, Bedingfield EW, (eds). Swimming III. Baltimore: University Park Press; 1979: 199-206

Correspondence

Prof. Ricardo Jorge FernandesPhD 

Faculty of Sport Swimming

University of Porto

Rua Dr. Plácido Costa 91

4200 Porto

Portugal

Phone: +351/22/5074 763

Fax: +351/22/5500 687

Email: ricfer@fade.up.pt