Prosthetic Reconstruction of the Auricle: Indications, Techniques, and Results

ABSTRACT

Extensive defects of the ear require satisfactory cosmetic reconstruction to enable the patient to achieve full social integration. Although surgical procedures are the gold standard for reconstruction of the ear, in some cases they cannot be performed because of extended scars, threatening tumor, or congenital tissue abnormalities. Prosthetic reconstruction of the auricle is an established and reliable alternative technique to autologous surgical reconstructions. Since studies performed by Brånemark, osseointegrated implants have been widely used to provide a reliable and stable anchorage for a prosthesis (prosthesis anchored to bone). To allow good osseointegration of the titanium screw implants, two stages are necessary. After careful preparation for the surgical procedure (local and general examination, computed tomography scan, skin preparation), screws are implanted into bone, which are then covered by a skin flap. During the second stage, the skin is incised, and penetrating fixtures are attached to the screw implants, which allow fixation of the prosthesis. This procedure is reliable and reproducible, with good to excellent results and stability over time.

KEYWORDS

Prosthesis - ear - osseointegration - plastic surgery

REFERENCES

• 1 Benoist M. Réhabilitation et prothèse maxillo-faciales. Paris: Prélat; 1978: 454
• 2 Firmin F. State-of-the-art autogenous ear reconstruction in cases of microtia.  Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;  68 25-52
• 3 Firmin F. [Secondary reconstruction of the external ear destroyed by burns. Indications and techniques. Apropos of 30 clinical cases].  Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 1995;  40 (3) 252-263
• 4 Firmin F. [Value of tissue expansion in total reconstruction of the external ear].  Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 1996;  41 (5) 495-502
• 5 Firmin F. Ear reconstruction in cases of typical microtia. Personal experience based on 352 microtic ear corrections.  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1998;  32 (1) 35-47
• 6 Firmin F, Sanger C, O'Toole G. Ear reconstruction following severe complications of otoplasty.  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;  61 (Suppl 1) S13-S20
• 7 Jost G, Firmin M F. [Restoration of the relief of the helix root in reconstructions of the external ear].  Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac. 1969;  86 (10) 675-678
• 8 Labbé D, Bénateau H, Compère J F, Sabin P. [Extra-oral implants: indications and contraindications].  Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 2001;  102 (5) 239-242
• 9 Sabin P, Bonin B. [Indications for extra-oral implants: strategic methods apropos of a clinical case].  Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 2001;  102 (5) 249-252
• 10 Wilkes G H, Wolfaardt J F. Osseointegrated alloplastic versus autogenous ear reconstruction: criteria for treatment selection.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;  93 (5) 967-979
• 11 Thorne C H, Brecht L E, Bradley J P, Levine J P, Hammerschlag P, Longaker M T. Auricular reconstruction: indications for autogenous and prosthetic techniques.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;  107 (5) 1241-1252
• 12 Sabin P, Cadre B, Ferrand J Y, Pacini R, Labbé D. [Bone-anchored implants: comparison of the techniques and values of endo- and juxta-bone implants].  Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 1997;  118 (2) 103-107
• 13 Farmand M. [A new implant system for the fixation of facial prostheses].  Dtsch Z Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 1991;  15 (6) 421-427
• 14 Federspil P. Delb W: Treatment of congenital malformations of the external and middle ear. In Ars B (ed): Congenital External and Middle Ear Malformations. Amsterdam, New York; Kugler, 1992, pp 47-71
• 15 Halsnad S M, Srinivasan D, Jeynes P, Sharp I. Re: P. Gentile, F. Nicoli, R. Caruso, G. Gravante, V. Cervelli. Alternative strategy to reconstruct the nose after excision: extra-oral implant anchored to bone [Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 47 (2009) 50-51].  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;  47 (6) 491-492
• 16 Badie-Modiri B, Kaplanski P. [Extra-oral implants: principal areas of implantation].  Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 2001;  102 (5) 229-233
• 17 Tjellström A. Osseointegrated implants for replacement of absent or defective ears.  Clin Plast Surg. 1990;  17 (2) 355-366
• 18 Jensen O T, Brownd C, Blacker J. Nasofacial prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants.  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992;  7 (2) 203-211
• 19 Jacobsson M G, Jönsson A K, Albrektsson T O, Turesson I E. Short- and long-term effects of irradiation on bone regeneration.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;  76 (6) 841-850
• 20 Jacobsson M, Tjellström A, Thomsen P, Albrektsson T, Turesson I. Integration of titanium implants in irradiated bone. Histologic and clinical study.  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1988;  97 (4 Pt 1) 337-340
• 21 Kosmidou L, Toljanic J A, Moran W J, Panje W R. The use of percutaneous implants for the prosthetic rehabilitation of orbital defects in irradiated cancer patients: a report of clinical outcomes and complications.  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;  13 (1) 121-126
• 22 Jacobsson M, Tjellstrom A, Fine L, Andersson H. A retrospective study of osseointegrated skin-penetrating titanium fixtures used for retaining facial prostheses.  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992;  7 (4) 523-528
• 23 Abu-Serriah M M, Bagg J, McGowan D A, Moos K F, MacKenzie D. The microflora associated with extra-oral endosseous craniofacial implants: a cross-sectional study.  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;  29 (5) 344-350
• 24 Granström G, Jacobsson M, Tjellström A. Titanium implants in irradiated tissue: benefits from hyperbaric oxygen.  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992;  7 (1) 15-25
• 25 Granström G, Tjellström A, Brånemark P I. Osseointegrated implants in irradiated bone: a case-controlled study using adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy.  J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;  57 (5) 493-499
• 26 Johnsson A A, Sawaii T, Jacobsson M, Granström G, Turesson I. A histomorphometric study of bone reactions to titanium implants in irradiated bone and the effect of hyperbaric oxygen treatment.  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;  14 (5) 699-706
• 27 Andersson G, Andreasson L, Bjelkengren G. Oral implant rehabilitation in irradiated patients without adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen.  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;  13 (5) 647-654
• 28 Bodard A G, Gourmet R, Lucas R, Bonnet E, Breton P. [Dental implants in irradiated areas: a series of 33 patients].  Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 2006;  107 (3) 137-142 discussion 143-144
• 29 Bénateau H, Crasson F, Labbé D, Riscala S, Alix T. [Extra-oral implants and irradiation: current trends].  Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 2001;  102 (5) 266-269
• 30 Brix M, Badie-Modiri B, Delcampe P. [Extra-oral implants: surgical procedures].  Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 2001;  102 (5) 243-247
• 31 Gentile P, Nicoli F, Caruso R, Gravante G, Cervelli V. Alternative strategy to reconstruct the nose after excision: extra-oral implant anchored to bone.  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;  47 (1) 50-51
• 32 Sabin P, Labbé D, Ferrand J Y, Daburon P, Compere J F. [Maxillofacial prosthesis fixed on endosseous implants. Apropos of 15 cases].  Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 1995;  40 (4) 363-370
• 33 Gitto C A, Plata W G, Schaaf N G. Evaluation of the peri-implant epithelial tissue of percutaneous implant abutments supporting maxillofacial prostheses.  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;  9 (2) 197-206
• 34 Holgers K M, Bjursten L M, Thomsen P, Ericson L E, Tjellström A. Experience with percutaneous titanium implants in the head and neck: a clinical and histological study.  J Invest Surg. 1989;  2 (1) 7-16
• 35 Holgers K M, Ljungh A. Cell surface characteristics of microbiological isolates from human percutaneous titanium implants in the head and neck.  Biomaterials. 1999;  20 (14) 1319-1326
• 36 Holgers K M, Roupe G, Tjellström A, Bjursten L M. Clinical, immunological and bacteriological evaluation of adverse reactions to skin-penetrating titanium implants in the head and neck region.  Contact Dermat. 1992;  27 (1) 1-7
• 37 Toljanic J A, Morello J A, Moran W J, Panje W R, May E F. Microflora associated with percutaneous craniofacial implants used for the retention of facial prostheses: a pilot study.  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995;  10 (5) 578-582