Endoscopy 2014; 46(04): 318-321
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1365292
Endoscopy essentials
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Colonoscopy, tumors

James E. East
1   Translational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
,
Simon J. Leedham
1   Translational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
2   Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
12 March 2014 (online)

Endoscopy Essentials

Reviews in the Endoscopy Essentials series cite publications from the past year which, in the authors’ opinion, reflect the state-of-the-art in endoscopy. Alongside a short summary of each paper, authors explain why they consider their selected articles to be of importance.

 
  • References

  • 1 De Sousa E, Melo F, Wang X et al. Poor-prognosis colon cancer is defined by a molecularly distinct subtype and develops from serrated precursor lesions. Nat Med 2013; 19: 614-618
  • 2 Sadanandam A, Lyssiotis CA, Homicsko K et al. A colorectal cancer classification system that associates cellular phenotype and responses to therapy. Nat Med 2013; 19: 619-625
  • 3 Marisa L, de Reyniès A, Duval A et al. Gene expression classification of colon cancer into molecular subtypes: characterization, validation, and prognostic value. PLoS Med 2013; 10: e1001453
  • 4 Pohl H, Srivastava A, Bensen SP et al. Incomplete polyp resection during colonoscopy – results of the complete adenoma resection (CARE) study. Gastroenterology 2013; 144: 74-80
  • 5 Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2012; 143: 844-857
  • 6 Hassan C, Quintero E, Dumonceau JM et al. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 842-851
  • 7 Metz AJ, Moss A, McLeod D et al. A blinded comparison of the safety and efficacy of hot biopsy forceps electrocauterization and conventional snare polypectomy for diminutive colonic polypectomy in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 484-490
  • 8 Gilbert DA, DiMarino AJ, Jensen DM et al. Status evaluation: hot biopsy forceps. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Technology Assessment Committee. . Gastrointest Endosc 1992; 38: 753-756
  • 9 Riley SA. Colonoscopic polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection: a practical guide. 2008 Available from: http://www.bsg.org.uk/images/stories/docs/sections/endo/polypectomy_08.pdf Accessed: 12 February 2014
  • 10 Repici A, Hassan C, Vitetta E et al. Safety of cold polypectomy for <10 mm polyps at colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 27-31
  • 11 Ladabaum U, Fioritto A, Mitani A et al. Real-time optical biopsy of colon polyps with narrow band imaging in community practice does not yet meet key thresholds for clinical decisions. Gastroenterology 2013; 144: 81-89
  • 12 Schachschal G, Mayr M, Treszl A et al. Endoscopic versus histological characterisation of polyps during screening colonoscopy. Gut 2014; 63: 458-465
  • 13 Wanders LK, East JE, Uitentuis SE et al. Diagnostic performance of narrowed spectrum endoscopy, autofluorescence imaging, and confocal laser endomicroscopy for optical diagnosis of colonic polyps: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14: 1337-1347
  • 14 Ignjatovic A, East JE, Suzuki N et al. Optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps at routine colonoscopy (Detect InSpect ChAracterise Resect and Discard; DISCARD trial): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2009; 10: 1171-1178
  • 15 Lee TJ, Rees CJ, Blanks RG et al. Colonoscopic factors associated with adenoma detection in a national colorectal cancer screening program. Endoscopy 2014; [Epub ahead of print]
  • 16 Corte C, Dahlenburg L, Selby W et al. Hyoscine butylbromide administered at the cecum increases polyp detection: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 917-922
  • 17 de Brouwer EJ, Arbouw ME, van der Zwet WC et al. Hyoscine N-butylbromide does not improve polyp detection during colonoscopy: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 835-840
  • 18 Rondonotti E, Radaelli F, Paggi S et al. Hyoscine N-butylbromide for adenoma detection during colonoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Dig Liver Dis 2013; 45: 663-668
  • 19 Plumb AA, Halligan S, Nickerson C et al. Use of CT colonography in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Gut 2013; [Epub ahead of print]
  • 20 Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Halligan S et al. Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection – systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 2011; 259: 393-405
  • 21 Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 2008; 134: 1570-1595
  • 22 Atkin W, Dadswell E, Wooldrage K et al. Computed tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for investigation of patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2013; 381: 1194-1202