Open Access
Endosc Int Open 2014; 2(02): E111-E116
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1377180
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

A new endoscopic closure method for gastric mucosal defects: feasibility of endoscopic hand suturing in an ex vivo porcine model (with video)

Osamu Goto
1   Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine
,
Motoki Sasaki
1   Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine
,
Hiroyuki Ishii
1   Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine
,
Joichiro Horii
1   Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine
,
Toshio Uraoka
1   Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine
,
Hiroya Takeuchi
2   Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
,
Yuko Kitagawa
2   Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
,
Naohisa Yahagi
1   Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

submitted 04. März 2014

accepted 17. März 2014

Publikationsdatum:
23. Juni 2014 (online)

Preview

Background and study aims: More secure endoscopic closure techniques for iatrogenic gastric defects are required for safe endoscopic surgery. We developed a novel endoscopic suturing method, endoscopic hand suturing (EHS), of gastric mucosal defects and determined its feasibility and efficacy ex vivo.

Materials and methods: We created 24 mucosal defects (each 2 cm in diameter) by endoscopic submucosal dissection. The following three techniques were tested: EHS with a 3 – 0 barbed suture that was grasped with biopsy forceps (n = 6) or a prototype through-the-scope needle holder (n = 6) by endoscopy, looping with endoloops (n = 6) by endoscopy, and clipping with hemoclips (n = 6) by hand. The mucosal edges were attached to each other at three points. The closure strength was compared among the three groups, and the procedural duration was compared between the EHS and looping groups.

Results: All 12 lesions were completely closed by EHS. The median strength of the closure, measured with a spring scale, was significantly greater in the EHS group (0.74 kg) than in the looping group (0.33 kg, P = 0.0012) or clipping group (0.07 kg, P = 0.0009). The median procedural duration did not significantly differ between the EHS and looping groups (19.7 vs. 19.8 minutes, P = 1.0000). The use of the needle holder significantly reduced the procedural duration compared with the biopsy forceps.

Conclusion: Mucosal defects can be firmly closed with EHS, which may be helpful for establishing a safer and more secure endoscopic surgery.