Download PDF
Nervenheilkunde 2013; 32(12): 962-965
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1633371
Geist & Gehirn
Schattauer GmbH

Literatur, Empathie und Verstehen

M. Spitzer
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
02 February 2018 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

 

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Baron-Cohen S, Leslie A, Frith U. Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”?. Cognition 1985; 21: 37-46.
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Baron-Cohen S. et al. The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychol Psychiatry 2001; 42: 241-251.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 Callaghan T. et al. Synchrony in the onset of mental-state reasoning – Evidence from five cultures. Psychological Science 2005; 16: 378-384.
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Kidd DC, Castano E. Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science 2013; 324: 377-380.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 5 Kißgen R, Schleiffer R. Zur Spezifitätshypothese eines Theory-of-Mind Defizits beim Frühkindlichen Autismus. Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie 2002; 30: 29-40.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 6 Liu D. et al. Theory of mind development in Chinese children: A meta-analysis of false-belief understanding across cultures and languages. Developmental Psychology 2008; 44: 523-531.
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Shamay-Tsoory SG. et al. The role of the orbitofrontal cortex in affective theory of mind deficits in criminal offenders with psychopathic tendencies. Cortex 2010; 46: 668-677.
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Shamay-Tsoory SG, Aharon-Peretz J. Dissociable prefrontal networks for cognitive and affective theory of mind: A lesion study. Neuropsychologia 2007; 45: 3054-3067.
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Wimmer H, Perner J. Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition 1983; 13: 103-128.
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar