Advances in Biomedical Image Analysis

Summary

Starting from raw data files coding eight bits of gray values per image pixel and identified with no more than eight characters to refer to the patient, the study, and technical parameters of the imaging modality, biomedical imaging has undergone manifold and rapid developments. Today, rather complex protocols such as Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) are used to handle medical images. Most restrictions to image formation, visualization, storage and transfer have basically been solved and image interpretation now sets the focus of research. Currently, a method-driven modeling approach dominates the field of biomedical image processing, as algorithms for registration, segmentation, classification and measurements are developed on a methodological level. However, a further metamorphosis of paradigms has already started. The future of medical image processing is seen in task-oriented solutions integrated into diagnosis, intervention planning, therapy and followup studies. This alteration of paradigms is also reflected in the literature. As German activities are strongly tied to the international research, this change of paradigm is demonstrated by selected papers from the German annual workshop on medical image processing collected in this special issue.

Keywords

Computer-assisted image processing - computer-assisted image interpretation - automatic data processing - medical informatics applications - pattern recognition - three-dimensional imaging

• References

• 1 Cao X, Huang HK. Current status and future advances of digital radiography and PACS. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 2000; 5: 80-8.
• 2 Donabedian A. Criteria and standards for quality assessment and monitoring. Quality Review Bulletin 1986; 12: 90-100.
• 3 Duncan JS, Ayache N. Medical image analysis: Progress over two decades and the challenges ahead. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2000; 22 (01) 85-106.
• 4 Gonzales RC, Wintz P. Digital Image Processing. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley; 1977
• 5 Gonzales RC, Woods RE. Digital image processing. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley; 1992
• 6 Hanson KM. Introduction. In Henson KM. (ed) Medical Image Processing – 1984 to 1999. Selected SPIE Papers on CD-ROM, vol. 13. Bellingham: SPIE Press; 2001
• 7 Hasman A, Haux R, Albert A. A systematic view on medical informatics. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 1996; 51: 131-9.
• 8 Haux R. Health care in the information society: What should be the role of medical informatics?. Methods Inf Med 2002; 41: 31-5.
• 9 Huang HK. Some historical remarks on picture archiving and communication systems. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 2003; 27: 93-9.
• 10 Kulikowski C, Ammenwerth E, Bohne A, Ganser K, Haux R, Knaup P, Maier C, Michel A, Singer R, Wolff AC. Medical imaging informatics: Opportunities and constraints. Methods Inf Med 2002; 41: 183-9.
• 11 Pratt WK. Digital image processing. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1978
• 12 Rosenfeld A, Kak AC. Digital picture processing. New York: Academic Press; 2nd ed. 1982
• 13 Talmon JL, Hasman A. Medical Informatics as a discipline at the beginning of the 21st century. Methods Inf Med 2002; 41: 4-7.