Characterizing Decision Support Telemedicine Systems

Summary

Objectives: Decision Support Telemedicine Systems (DSTS) are at the intersection of two disciplines: telemedicine and clinical decision support systems (CDSS). The objective of this paper is to provide a set of characterizing properties for DSTSs. This characterizing property set (CPS) can be used for typing, classifying and clustering DSTSs.

Methods: We performed a systematic keyword-based literature search to identify candidate-characterizing properties. We selected a subset of candidates and refined them by assessing their potential in order to obtain the CPS.

Results: The CPS consists of 14 properties, which can be used for the uniform description and typing of applications of DSTSs. The properties are grouped in three categories that we refer to as the problem dimension, process dimension, and system dimension. We provide CPS instantiations for three prototypical applications.

Conclusions: The CPS includes important properties for typing DSTSs, focusing on aspects of communication for the telemedicine part and on aspects of decisionmaking for the CDSS part. The CPS provides users with tools for uniformly describing DSTSs.

Keywords

System characterization - typing - telemedicine - clinical decision support systems - review

• References

• 1 Miller RA. Medical Diagnostic Decision Support Systems - Past, Present, and Future. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 1994; 1: 8-27.
• 2 Nykänen P.. On the ontology of a decision support system in health informatics. Decision making support systems: achievements, trends and challenges for. Idea Group Publishing 2003; 120-42.
• 3 Winter A, Brigl B, Wendt T. Modeling Hospital Information Systems (part 1): The Revised Threelayer Graph-based Meta Model 3LGM². Methods Inf Med 2003; 42: 544-51.
• 4 Wendt T, Häber A, Brigl B, Winter A. Modeling Hospital Information Systems (part 2): Using the 3LGM² Tool for Modeling Patient Record Management. Methods Inf Med 2004; 43: 256-67.
• 5 The TELEMEDICINE Project http://www.cee.hw.ac.uk/Databases/lachs/medicine.html 2004
• 6 Marradi A. Classification, Typology, Taxonomy. Qual Quan 1990; 24: 129-57.
• 7 Wyatt JC. Decision support systems. J Roy Soc Med 2000; 93 (012) 629-33.
• 8 Mayo Clinic. http://www.mayoclinic.com/ 2004
• 9 NHS: National Health Service. http://www.nhs.uk/ 2004
• 10 Wootton R. Recent advances: Telemedicine. BMJ 2001; 323 7312 557-60.
• 11 Magrabi F, Lovell NH, Celler BG. A web-based approach for electrocardiogram monitoring in the home. Int J Med Inf 1999; 54 (02) 145-53.
• 12 DICOM, Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine. http://medical.nema.org 2004
• 13 Arenson RL, Andriole KP, Avrin DE, Gould RG. Computers in imaging and health care: now and in the future. J Digit Imaging 2000; 13 (04) 145-56.
• 14 Loane M, Wootton R. A review of guidelines and standards for telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 2002; 8 (02) 63-71.
• 15 Shortliffe EH. Computer programs to support clinical decision making. J Am Med Inform Assn 1987; 258 (01) 61-6.
• 16 Stanberry B. Telemedicine: barriers and opportunities in the 21st century. J Intern Med 2000; 247 (06) 615-28.
• 17 Linkous JD. Telemedicine: an overview. J Med Prac Manage 2002; 18 (01) 24-7.
• 18 Burdick AE, Berman B. Teledermatology. Adv Derm 1997; 12: 19-45.
• 19 Eedy DJ, Wootton R. Teledermatology: a review. Brit J Dermatol 2001; 144 (04) 696-707.
• 20 Hailey D, Jacobs P, Simpson J, Doze S. An assessment framework for telemedicine applications. J Telemed Telecare 1999; 5 (03) 162-70.
• 21 Whitten PS, Mair FS, Haycox A, May CR, Williams TL, Hellmich S. Systematic review of cost effectiveness studies of telemedicine interventions. BMJ 2002; 324 7351 1434-7.
• 22 Hunt DL, Haynes RB, Hanna SE, Smith K. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 1998; 280 (015) 1339-46.
• 23 Kaplan B. Evaluating informatics applications - clinical decision support systems literature review. Int J Med Inf 2001; 64 (01) 15-37.
• 24 Shea S, DuMouchel W, Bahamonde L. A metaanalysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventive care in the ambulatory setting. J Am Med Inform Assn 1996; 3 (06) 399-409.
• 25 Owens DK, Bravata DM. Computer-based decision support: wishing on a star?. Effective Clinical Practice 2001; 4 (01) 34-8.