Evaluation of Medical Internet Sites

Abstract

A huge amount of medical information is available on the Internet for both experts and laypersons. These resources are frequently used to answer current medical questions and are thus likely to influence the behavior of the users. Criteria for assessing the quality of medical Internet resources have been established by a number of authors and institutions to provide reliable medical information on the Internet for both patients and physicians. Clinical studies on the impact of information on the Internet are still lacking. The next step is to evaluate the outcome of such information services and to prove that they affect health-related parameters. Due to different constraints, classical strategies of controlled clinical trials can only be partly applied. New methods have to be developed and validated in practice.

Keywords

Internet - Evaluation - Quality of Information

• References

• 1 Adelhard K, Obst O. Evaluation of Medical Internet Resources: Quality Criteria. Gesundheitswesen. 1998; 5: 287-9.
• 2 Impicciatore P, Pandolfini C, Casella N, Bonati M. Reliability of health information for the public on the world wide web: systematic review of advice on managing fever in children at home. BMJ 1997; 314: 1875-9.
• 3 Brown MS. Consumer Health and Medical Information on the Internet: Supply and Demand [ONLINE]. URL: http://etrg.findsvd.com/health/mktginfo.html.
• 4 Ogle P. The Web beckons you; better check it out: Web Sites provide instant access to information and misinformation. Diagnostic Imaging. 1997: 5. [Online] URL: http://www.dimag.com/db_area/archives/1997/5comm.htm
• 5 Silberg M, Lundberg GD, Musacchino RA. Assessing, Controlling, and Assuring the Quality of Medical Information on the Internet. JAMA 1997; 277: 1244-5.
• 6 Wyatt CW. Measuring quality and impact of the world wide web. BMJ 1997; 314: 1879-81.
• 7 Rettig J. Beyond Cool: Analog Models for Reviewing Digital Sources. ONLINE 1996; 5: 52-64.
• 8 Galloway P. Medical Markup Language? A case for the contextual marking of medical information on the Web [Online]. URL: http://www.medweb.co.uk/public/reference/feature/feature.htm
• 9 BHIA. BMIA-REC-Quality Standards for Medical Publishing on the Web-7/12/96 [Online]. URL: http://www.bhia.org/document_park/standards.htm
• 10 Horton R. Sponsorship, Authorship, and a Tale of Two Media. Lancet. 349: 1411-2.
• 11 The Dublin Core Metadata Element Set Home Page [Online]. URL: http://purl.org/metadata/dublin_core.
• 12 Appleyard RJ, Malet G. A Proposal for using Metadata Encoding Techniques for Health Care Information Indexing on the WWW [Online]. URL: ohsu.edu/~appleyar/d004245.html.
• 13 Jadad AR, Gagliardi A. Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel?. JAMA 1998; 279 (Suppl. 08) 611-4.
• 14 Hernandez-Borges A, Pareras LG, Jimenez A. Comparative Analysis of Pediatric Mailing Lists on the Internet. Pediatrics 1997; 100: 8.
• 15 Demas S, McDonald P, Lawrence G. The Internet and Collection Development: Mainstreaming Selection of Internet Resources. Library Research & Technology Services 1995; 39 (Suppl. 03) 275-90.
• 16 Obst O. Internet: Das erste OMNI-Seminar in London. Bibliotheksdienst 1996; 30 (Suppl. 01) 90-3. [Online] URL: http://medweb.unimuenster.de/~obsto/text/omni.html.
• 17 Stocker D, Cooke A. Evaluation of Networked Information Sources. Publications of Essen University Library. 1995; 18: 287-312. 5.
• 18 Tate M, Alexander J. Teaching Critical Evaluation Skills for World Wide Web Resources. Computers in Libraries. 1996: 49-55.
• 19 -Health Information Technology Institute, Criteria for Assessing the Quality of Health Information on the Internet, Working Draft. [ONLINE] http://www.mitretek.org/hiti schowcase/documents/criteria.html.
• 20 Murray PJ. Reviewing and Evaluating Web Sites – Some Suggested Guidelines. Nursing Standard Online. 1997: 11 (45). [Online]: URL: http://www.nursing.standrad.co.uk/vol11-45/ol-art.htm.
• 21 Wyatt JC. Telemedicine trials – clinical pull or technology push?. BMJ 1996; 313: 1380-1.
• 22 Krishna S, Balas EA, Spencer DC, Griffin JZ, Boren SA. Clinical trials of interactive computerized patient education: implications for family practice. J Fam Pract 1997; 45 (Suppl. 01) 25-33.
• 23 Wyatt JC, Spiegelhalter D. Evaluating medical expert systems: what to test and how?. Med Inf 1990; 15: 205-17.
• 24 Friedman C, Wyatt J. Evaluation methods in medical informatics . New York: Springer-Verlag; 1997
• 25 Kelly MA, Oldham J. The Internet and randomised controlled trials. Int J Med Inf 1997; 47 1-2 91-9.
• 26 Gerritsen MG, Sartorius OE, v d Veen FM, Meester GT. Data management in multi-center clinical trials and the role of a nationwide computer network. A 5-year evaluation. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1993: 659-62.
• 27 de Groen PC, Barry JA, Schaller WJ. Applying World Wide Web technology to the study of patients with rare diseases. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129 (Suppl. 02) 107-13.
• 28 Afrin LB, Kuppuswamy V, Slater B, Stuart RK. Electronic clinical trial protocol distribution via the World-Wide-Web: a prototype for reducing costs and errors, improving accrual, and saving trees. JAMIA 1997; 4 (Suppl. 01) 25-35.
• 29 Adelhard K, Obst O. Evaluation of Medical Internet Resources: Outcome. Gesundheitswesen 1998; 6: 339-41.
• 30 Obst O. Use of Medical Internet Sources in Germany. In: Health Information for the Global Village, Proceedings of the 7th International Congress on Medical Librarianship, Washington, D.C., May 10-12, 1995. Hrsg. von Eve-Marie Lacroix/Washington, DC: Local organizing Committee, 7th International Congress on Medical Librarianship.; 1995: 418.
• 31 Obst O. Untersuchung der Internetbenutzung durch Bibliothekskunden an der Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Münster. Bibliotheksdienst. 1995; 29 (Suppl. 12) 1980-98. [Online] URL: http://medweb.uni-muenster.de/~obsto/istudie.
• 32 Der Spiegel. 1996: 11.
• 33 Quade G, Puschel N, Far F. CancerNet redistribution via WWW. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1996: 403-7.
• 34 Oppenheimer AN. Questionnaire design, interviewing & attitude measurement . London: Pinter; 1991
• 35 Meinert CL. Clinical Trials. Design, Conduct and Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press; 1986
• 36 Soetikno RM, Mrad R, Pao V, Lenert LA. Quality-of-life research on the Internet: feasibility and potential biases in patients with ulcerative colitis. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997; 4 (Suppl. 06) 426-35.
• 37 Houston JD, Fiore DC. Online medical surveys: using the Internet as a research tool. MD Comput 1998; Mar 15 (Suppl. 02) 116-20.
• 38 Hough B. Formative evaluation of a World Wide Web-based Chiari malformation hypermedia program. J Biocommun 1997; 24 (Suppl. 04) 22-32.
• 39 Fawcett J, Buhle Jr EL. Using the Internet for data collection. An innovative electronic strategy. Comput Nurs 1995; Nov 13 (Suppl. 06) 273-9.