The Learning Process in the Epistemology of Medical Information

Abstract:

Progress in the past few decades in representing medical knowledge, along with the availability of low-cost, powerful workstation computers, has increased interest in encoding all medical records in electronic form. But despite the advantages of legibility, access, and automated performance reviews, computerization may also restrict what can be recorded and rigidify health care interactions with patients. Balancing the beneficial and negative effects requires an understanding of medical practice, especially the difference between human knowledge and today’s computer programs. Human perceptual and conceptual capabilities bring an aspect of improvisation and reinterpretation to every human action, which in general computers today cannot replicate. Designers of medical record systems must consider the creative process by which descriptions are generated by people, as well as the collaborative process by which descriptions of past work are reinterpreted for guiding future decisions. This paper provides a framework for understanding these issues, illustrated by design opportunities.

Keywords:

Human Learning - Medical Vocabulary - Objectivism - Holistic Analysis - Medical Practice

• References

• 1 Bateson G. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballentine Books; 1972
• 2 Buchanan BG, Shortliffe EH. Rule-Based Expert System: The MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1984
• 3 Campbell KE, Oas AK, Musen MA. A logical foundation for the representation of clinical data. J Amer Med Info Assoc 1994; 1: 218-32.
• 4 Clancey WJ. Why today’s computers don’t learn the way people do. In: Flach PA, Meersman RA. eds. Future Directions in Artificial Intelligence. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1991: 53-62.
• 5 Clancey WJ. Guidon-Manage revisited: A socio-technical systems approach. J of AI and Educ 1993; 4: 5-34.
• 6 Clancey WJ. Situated action: A neuropsychological interpretation (Response to Vera and Simon). Cog Sci 1993; 17: 87-116.
• 7 Clancey WJ. Practice Cannot be Reduced to Theory: Knowledge, Representations, and Change in the Workplace. In: Bagnara S, Zuccermaglio C, Stucky S. eds. Organizational Learning and Technological Change. 1995 (in press).
• 8 Dewey J. The criteria of experience (1938). In: McDermott JJ. ed. The Philosophy of John Dewey. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1981: 511-23.
• 9 Edelman GM. Bright Air, Brilliant Fire: On the Matter of the Mind. New York: Basic Books; 1992
• 10 Engestrtim Y. Learning by Expanding. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy; 1987
• 11 Gardner H. The Mind’s New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution. New York: Basic Books; 1985
• 12 Gasser L. Social conceptions of knowledge and action. Artif Int 1991; 47: 107-38.
• 13 Greenbaum J, Kyng M. Design at Work: Cooperative’ Design of Computer Systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1991
• 14 Gregory B. Inventing Reality: Physics as Language. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 1988
• 15 Hirschorn L. Beyond Mechanization: Work and Technology in the Postindustrial Age. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1984
• 16 Jordan B. Birth in Four Cultures. London: Eden Press; 1983
• 17 Kling R. Cooperation, coordination and control in computer-supported work. Comm ACM 1991; 34: 83-8.
• 18 Kukla CD, Clemens EA, Morse RS, Cash O. Designing effective systems: A tool approach. In: Adler PS, Winograd T A. eds. Usability: Turning Technologies into Tools. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992: 41-65.
• 19 Lakoff G. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1987
• 20 Lincoln TL, Essin OJ, Ware WH. The electronic medical record: A challenge for computer science to develop clinically and socially relevant computer systems to coordinate information for patient care and analysis. The Information Society 1993; 9: 157-88.
• 21 Lave J. Cognition in Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1988
• 22 Lave J, Wenger E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991
• 23 Nonaka I. The knowledge-creating company. Harv Bus Rev 1991; November-December: 96-104.
• 24 Reeke GN, Edelman GM. Real brains and artificial intelligence. Daedalus 1988; 117: 143-73.
• 25 Ryle G. The Concept of Mind. New York: Barnes & Noble, Inc; 1949
• 26 Schön DA. Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy. In: Ortony A. ed. Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1979: 254-83.
• 27 Schön DA. Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1987
• 28 Scribner S, Sachs P. Knowledge acquisition at work. Inst on Educ and the Econ IEEE Brif 1991; 2: 1-4.
• 29 Suchman LA. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge Press; 1987
• 30 Theureau J, Filippi G, Gaillard L. Traffic control activities and design: Case studies. In: Workshop on Work Activity Analysis in the Perspective of Organization and Design. Paris: October 1992
• 31 Tyler S. The Said and the Unsaid: Mind, Meaning, and Culture. New York: Academic Press; 1978
• 32 Wilden A. The Rules are No Game: The Strategy of Communication. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1987
• 33 Winograd T, Flores F. Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Norwood: Ablex; 1986
• 34 Wynn E. Taking Practice Seriously. In: Greenbaum J, Kyng M. eds. Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1991: 45-64.
• 35 Zuboff S. In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power. New York: Basic Books; 1988