Download PDF
Psychiatr Prax 2017; 44(06): 316-322
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-105861
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Psychiatrische Zwangsmaßnahmen: Prävention und Präferenzen aus Patientenperspektive

Coercive Interventions in Psychiatry: Prevention and Patients’ Preferences
Juliane Mielau   *
1   Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Campus Mitte (PUK Charité im SHK), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
,
Jasmin Altunbay   *
1   Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Campus Mitte (PUK Charité im SHK), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
,
Andreas Heinz
1   Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Campus Mitte (PUK Charité im SHK), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
,
Benedikt Reuter
2   Humboldt Universität zu Berlin
,
Felix Bermpohl
1   Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Campus Mitte (PUK Charité im SHK), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
,
Johannes Rentzsch
1   Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Campus Mitte (PUK Charité im SHK), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
,
Anja Lehmann
1   Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Campus Mitte (PUK Charité im SHK), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
,
Christiane Montag
1   Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Campus Mitte (PUK Charité im SHK), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
11 July 2016 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Anliegen Präventionsstrategien und Präferenzen von Zwangsmaßnahmen (ZM) wurden aus der Sicht von psychiatrischen Patienten erfasst.

Methode Teilstrukturierte Interviews mit 90 überwiegend zwangserfahrenen Patienten mit psychotischen Erkrankungen.

Ergebnis und Diskussion Aus Patientensicht könnten ZM durch ein größeres Angebot an Einzeltherapien, Verbesserungen der Personalschlüssel, Ausbildung und Kommunikation sowie räumliche Rückzugsmöglichkeiten reduziert werden. Die Mehrheit der Befragten präferierte eine – im Falle der Selbstgefährdung durch Festhalten, bei Fremdgefährdung durch Fixierung ermöglichte – Zwangsmedikation gegenüber anderen Sicherungsmaßnahmen.

Abstract

Objective This study explores patients’ preferences and measures of prevention of coercive methods in psychiatric treatment.

Methods Structured interviews of 90 patients with psychotic disorders were undertaken, most of whom had previously experienced coercive methods.

Results Participants saw preventive potential in a wider availability of individual non-pharmacological therapy, improvement of staff professional competence and communication skills, high staff-to-patient ratios and retreat facilities. The majority of participants preferred forced medication and manual restraint in case of self-endangerment, and forced medication and mechanical restraint in the event of endangerment of others.

Conclusion Patients’ suggestions relating to prevention of coercion are in line with most expert’s opinions. In case coercive methods are required, manual restraint and application of forced medication is accepted as the treatment of choice according to most patients in case of self-endangerment.

Schlüsselwörter

Zwangsmaßnahmen - Fixierung - Patientenperspektive - Prävention

Keywords

coercion - involuntary treatment - consumers’ perspective - prevention strategies - preference

* Beide Autorinnen haben gleiche Anteile zu dieser Arbeit beigetragen.


 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik und Nervenheilkunde. Achtung der Selbstbestimmung und Anwendung von Zwang bei der Behandlung von psychisch erkrankten Menschen – Eine ethische Stellungnahme der DGPP. (23.09.2014). Im Internet: www.dgppn.de/en/presse/pressemitteilungen/detailansicht/article/307/achtung-der.html (Stand 17.12.2015)
  • 2 Terkelsen TB, Larsen IB. Fear, danger and aggression in a Norwegian locked psychiatric ward: Dialogue and ethics of care as contributions to combating difficult situations. Nurs Ethics
    PubMed
  • 3 Bundesverfassungsgericht (BVerfG). Beschluss des Zweiten Senats vom 23. März 2011. – 2 BvR 882/09 – Rn. (1-83) (23.3.2011). Im Internet: www.bverfg.de/e/rs20110323_2bvr088209.html (Stand: 17.12.2015)
  • 4 Müller S, Walter H, Heinz A. Zwangsbehandlungen bei psychisch Kranken: Fixieren statt behandeln?. Dtsch Ärztebl International 2012; 109: 198-202
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Steinert T, Hinüber W, Arenz D. et al. Ethische Konflikte bei der Zwangsbehandlung schizophrener Patienten. Nervenarzt 2001; 72: 700-708
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Petit M, Klein JP. Zwangsbehandlung mit richterlicher Genehmigung wieder möglich. Dtsch Arztebl 2013; 110: 377-379
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Berry K, Ford S, Jellicoe-Jones HG. PTSD symptoms associated with the experiences of psychosis and hospitalisation: a review of the literature. Clin Psychol Rev 2013; 33: 526-538
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Grubaugh AL, Frueh BC, Zinzow HM. et al. Patients’ perceptions of care and safety within psychiatric settings. Psychol Serv 2007; 4: 193-201
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 O’Donoghue B, Lyne J, Hill M. et al. Physical coercion, perceived pressures and procedural justice in the involuntary admission and future engagement with mental health services. Eur Psychiatry 2011; 26: 208-214
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Swartz MS, Swanson JW, Hannon MJ. Does fear of coercion keep people away from mental health treatment? Evidence from a survey of persons with schizophrenia and mental health professionals. Behav Sci Law 2003; 21: 459-472
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Lincoln TM, Heumann K, Teichert M. The last resort? An overview on discussion and research on the use of compulsary drug treatment in psychiatry. Verhaltenstherapie 2014; 24: 22-32
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Nelstrop L, Chandler-Oatts J, Bingley W. et al. A systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of restraint and seclusion as interventions for the short-term management of violence in adult psychiatric inpatient settings and emergency departments. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2006; 3: 8-18
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Lang UE, Hartmann S, Schulz-Hartmann S. et al. Do locked doors in psychiatric hospitals prevent patients from absconding?. Eur J Psychiat 2010; 24: 199-204
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Ketelsen R, Zechert C, Driessen M. Kooperationsmodell zwischen psychiatrischen Kliniken mit dem Ziel der Qualitätssicherung bei Zwangsmaßnahmen. Psychiat Prax 2007; 34: 208-211
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Anderl-Doliwa B, Breitmaier J, Elsner S. et al. Leitlinien für den Umgang mit Zwangsmaßnahmen. Psych Pflege Heute 2005; 11: 100-102
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Nervenheilkunde e. V. (DGPPN). Therapeutische Maßnahmen bei aggressivem Verhalten in der Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie. Heidelberg: Springer; 2010
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 17 Steinert T, Bohnet U, Eisele F. et al. Freiheitseinschränkende Zwangsmaßnahmen bei Patienten in psychiatrischen Krankenhäusern. Epidemiologie und Qualitätsaspekte. Nervenarzt 2006; 12: 1539-1544
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Georgieva I, Mulder CL, Wierdsma A. Patients’ Preference and Experiences of Forced Medication and Seclusion. Psychiatr Q 2012; 83: 1-13
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Bergk J, Einsiedler B, Flammer E. et al. A Randomized Controlled Comparison of Seclusion and Mechanical Restraint in Inpatient Settings. Psychiatr Serv 2011; 62: 1310-1317
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Steinert T, Birk M, Flammer E. et al. Subjective Distress After Seclusion or Mechanical Restraint: One-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Study. Psychiatr Serv 2013; 64: 1012-1017
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Steinert T. After 200 years of psychiatry: are mechanical restraints in Germany still inevitable?. Psychiat Prax 2011; 38: 348-351
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Bundesärztekammer. Stellungnahme der Zentralen Kommission zur Wahrung ethischer Grundsätze in der Medizin und ihren Grenzgebieten (Zentrale Ethikkommission) bei der Bundesärztekammer Zwangsbehandlung bei psychischen Erkrankungen. Dtsch Ärztebl 2013; 110: A-1334 / B-1170 / C-1154
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 van der Schaaf PS, Dusseldorp E, Keuning FM. et al. Impact of the physical environment of psychiatric wards on the use of seclusion. Br J Psychiatry 2013; 202: 142-149
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Kho K, Sensky T, Mortimer A. et al. Prospective study into factors associated with aggressive incidents in psychiatric acute admission wards. Br J Psychiatry 1998; 172: 38-43
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Lanza M, Kayne H, Hicks C. et al. Environmental characteristics related to patient assault. Iss Ment Health Nurs 1994; 15: 319-335
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Dresler T, Rohe T, Weber M. et al. Effects of improved hospital architecture on coercive measures. World Psychiatry 2015; 14: 105-106
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 van der Merwe M, Bowers L, Jones J. et al. Locked doors in acute inpatient psychiatry: a literature review. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2009; 16: 293-299
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Chou KR, Lu RB, Mao WC. Factors relevant to patient assaultive behavior and assault in acute inpatient psychiatric untis in Taiwan. Arch Psychiat Nurs 2002; 16: 187-195
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Soininen P, Putkonen H, Joffe G. et al. Methodological and ethical challenges in studying patients’ perceptions of coercion: a systematic mixed studies review. BMC Psychiatry 2014; 14: 162
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Nelstrop L, Chandler-Oatts J, Bingley W. et al. A systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of restraint and seclusion as interventions for the short-term management of violence in adult psychiatric inpatient settings and emergency departments. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2006; 3: 8-18
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health. Violence and Aggression – Short-term management in mental health, health and community settings. 2015. Im Internet: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng10/evidence/full-guideline-70830253 (Stand: 17.02.2015)
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 32 Bowers L, Jarrett M, Clark N. et al. Absconding: why patients leave. J Psychiatric Mental Health Nurs 1999; 6: 199-205
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Dilling H, Mombour W, Schmidt MH. et al. Internationale Klassifikation psychischer Störungen: ICD-10 Kapitel V (F) Klinisch-diagnostische Leitlinien. 5. Aufl. Bern: Hans Huber; 2004
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 34 Mielau J, Gallinat J, Heinz A. et al. Subjective experience of coercion in psychiatric care: a study comparing the attitudes of patients and healthy volunteers towards coercive methods and their justification. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci
    PubMed
  • 35 Young RC, Biggs JT, Ziegler VE, Meyer DA. Young Mania Rating Scale. Handbook of Psychiatric Measures. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000: 540-542
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 36 Addington D, Addington J, Maticka-Tyndale E. et al. Reliability and validity of a depression rating scale for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Res 1992; 6: 201-208
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Müller MJ, Benkert O. German version of the Calgary Depression Rating Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS): Validity and Specificity. Pharmacopsychiatry 1999; 32: 198
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Kay S, Fiszbein A, Opler L. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for Schizophrenia. Schiz Bull 1987; 13: 261-276
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 40 David AS. Insight and psychosis. Br J Psychiatry 1990; 156: 798-808
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Mahler L, Jarchov-Jádi I, Montag C, Gallinat J. Das Weddinger Modell. Resilienz- und Ressourcenorientierung im klinischen Kontext. 1. Aufl. Bonn: Psychiatrie-Verlag; 2013
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 42 Ljungberg A, Denhov A, Topor A. The Art of Helpful Relationships with Professionals: A Meta-ethnography of the Perspective of Persons with Severe Mental Illness. Psychiat Quart 2015; 86: 471-495
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Sheehan KA, Burns T. Perceived coercion and the therapeutic relationship: a neglected association?. Psychiatr Serv 2011; 62: 471-476
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Beauford JE, McNiel DE, Binder RL. Utility of the initial therapeutic alliance in evaluating psychiatric patients’ risk of violence. Am J Psychiatry 1997; 154: 1272-1276
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Schöttle D, Schimmelmann BG, Karow A. et al. Effectiveness of integrated care including therapeutic assertive community treatment in severe schizophrenia spectrum and bipolar I disorders: the 24-month follow-up ACCESS II study. J Clin Psychiatry 2014; 75: 1371-1379
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 46 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Nervenheilkunde. Behandlungsleitlinie Psychosoziale Therapien bei Menschen mit schweren psychischen Erkrankungen. Heidelberg: Springer; 2012
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 47 Needham I, Abderhalden C, Meer R. et al. The effectiveness of two interventions in the managements of patient violence in acute mental inpatient settings: report on a pilot study. J Psych Men Health Nurs 2004; 11: 595-601
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Lang UE. Innovative Psychiatrie mit offenen Türen. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2013
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 49 Price O, Baker J, Bee P. et al. Learning and performance outcomes of mental health staff training in de-escalation techniques for the management of violence and aggression. Br J Psychiatry 2015; 206: 447-455
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Sheline Y, Nelson T. Patient choice: deciding between psychotropic medication and physical restraints in an emergency. Bull Am Acad Psych Law 1993; 21: 321-329
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Naber D, Kircher T, Hessel K. Schizophrenic patients’ retrospective attitudes regarding involuntary psychopharmacological treatment and restraint. Eur Psychiatry 1996; 11: 7-11
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Georgieva I, Mulder CL, Whittington R. Evaluation of behavioral changes and subjective distress after exposure to coercive inpatient interventions. BMC Psychiatry 2012; 12: 54
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 53 Georgieva I, Mulder CL, Noorthoorn E. Reducing seclusion through involuntary medication: a randomized clinical trial. Psychiatry Res 2013; 205: 48-53
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Huf G, Coutinho ES, Adams CE. Physical restraints versus seclusion room for management of people with acute aggression or agitation due to psychotic illness (TREC-SAVE): a randomized trial. Psychol Med 2012; 42: 2265-2273
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 55 Bowers L, Wright S, Stewart D. Patients subject to high levels of coercion: staff’s understanding. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2014; 35: 364-371
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 56 Bowers L, van der Merwe M, Paterson B. et al. Manual restraint and shows of force: the City-128 study. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2012; 21: 30-40
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 57 Wesuls R, Heinzmann T, Pester U. et al. Das Vier-Stufen-Immobilisationskonzept (4-SIK), Revolutionierung der Fixierungspraxis?. Psych Pflege 2013; 19: 69-73
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 58 UN-General-Assembly. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. 2006. Im Internet: www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull/shtml (Stand: 17.12.2015)
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 59 Gaskin CJ, Elsom SJ, Happell B. Interventions for reducing the use of seclusion in psychiatric facilities: review of the literature. Br J Psychiatry 2007; 191: 298-303
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 60 Heinz A, Müller S, Wackerhagen C. et al. Human rights in psychiatry. Swiss Arch Neurol Psych 2015; 166: 4-7
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 61 Wolff J, Berger M, Normann C. et al. Wohin führt die Konvergenz der Psychiatriebudgets?. Nervenarzt 2015; 86: 852-856
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar