Open Access
Endosc Int Open 2016; 04(12): E1286-E1291
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-118176
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Learning curve for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of pancreatic lesions in a novel ex-vivo simulation model

J. M. Gonzalez
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
2   Department of Gastroenterology, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, AP-HM, Marseille, France
,
J. Cohen
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
,
M. A. Gromski
3   Division of Gastroenterology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
,
K. Saito
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
,
A. Loundou
4   Department of Public Health, Medical Evaluation, Aix-Marseille University, AP-HM, Marseille, France
,
K. Matthes
5   Department of Anesthesiology, Kaiser Permanente Maui Memorial Medical Center, Wailuku, HI, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 06 April 2016

accepted after revision 13 September 2016

Publication Date:
15 December 2016 (online)

Preview

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is essential in the management of digestive cancers. However, teaching and learning this technique remain challenging due to the lack of cost-effective models.

Material and methods: This was a prospective experimental study using a complete porcine upper gastrointestinal ex-vivo organ package, placed in an Erlangen Active Simulator for Interventional Endoscopy (EASIE-R), and prepared with one cyst and two solid masses (2 cm). Five fellows inexperienced in EUS-FNA were enrolled, performing 10 procedures on each lesion, alternatively. The total time, number of attempts for success, of needle view losses, and of scope handling were recorded, associated with an independent skills rating by procedure. We compared the first 15 procedures with the last 15 for each fellow.

Results: The fellows successfully performed all procedures in 2 to 40 minutes, requiring 1 to 6 attempts. All (5/5) improved their total time taken (P < 0.001), number of times when the EUS view of the needle was lost (P < 0.05), scope handling (P < 0.005), and skills rating (P < 0.001), whereas 4/5 (80 %) improved their number of attempts. The overall evaluation showed a significant decrease (P < 0.001) in the total time taken (11.2 ± 7.8 vs 4.3 ± 2.2 minutes), number of attempts (2.6 ± 1.2 vs 1.2 ± 0.7), number of times when the EUS view of the needle was lost (2.3 ± 2 vs 0.5 ± 0.7), and need for scope handling (1.1 ± 1.7 vs 0.1 ± 0.2). We also observed an improvement in skills rating (5 ± 1.9 vs. 7.7 ± 1.1).

Conclusion: This newly designed ex-vivo model seems to be an effective way to improve the initial learning of EUS-FNA, by performing 30 procedures.