Bleeding Risk in Elderly Patients with Venous Thromboembolism Who Would Have Been Excluded from Anticoagulation Trials

Abstract

Older patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) are underrepresented in clinical anticoagulation trials. We examined to which extent elderly patients with VTE would be excluded from such trials and compared the bleeding risk between hypothetically excluded and enrolled patients. We studied 991 patients aged ≥65 years with acute VTE in a prospective multicenter cohort. We identified 12 landmark VTE oral anticoagulation trials from the eighth and updated ninth American College of Chest Physician Guidelines. For each trial, we abstracted the exclusion criteria and calculated the proportion of our study patients who would have been excluded from trial participation. We examined the association between five common exclusion criteria (hemodynamic instability, high bleeding risk, comorbidity, co-medication, and invasive treatments) and major bleeding (MB) within 36 months using competing risk regression, adjusting for age, sex, and periods of anticoagulation. A median of 31% (range: 20–52%) of our patients would have been excluded from participation in the landmark trials. Hemodynamic instability (sub-hazard ratio [SHR]: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.1–4.7), comorbidity (SHR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1–2.2), and co-medication (SHR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.0–2.3) were associated with MB. Compared to eligible patients, those with ≥2 exclusion criteria had a twofold (SHR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.38–3.39) increased risk of MB. Overall, about one-third of older patients would not be eligible for participation in guideline-defining VTE anticoagulation trials. The bleeding risk increases significantly with the number of exclusion criteria present. Thus, results from such trials may not be generalizable to older, multimorbid, and co-medicated patients.

Keywords

venous thromboembolism - anticoagulation - bleeding risk - exclusion criteria - elderly

Authors Contribution

Concept and design: C.S., O.S., M.M., D.A. Data acquisition: M.M., M.R., N.R., D.A. Statistical analysis: O.S. Drafting of the manuscript: C.S., D.A. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: all authors. Final approval of the manuscript: all authors.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 02. Mai 2022

Angenommen: 16. November 2022

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
09. Januar 2023

• References

• 1 Kearon C, Kahn SR, Agnelli G, Goldhaber S, Raskob GE, Comerota AJ. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008; 133 (6, Suppl): 454S-545S
• 2 Nieto JA, Solano R, Ruiz-Ribó MD. et al; Riete Investigators. Fatal bleeding in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy for venous thromboembolism: findings from the RIETE registry. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8 (06) 1216-1222
• 3 Spencer FA, Gore JM, Lessard D. et al. Venous thromboembolism in the elderly. A community-based perspective. Thromb Haemost 2008; 100 (05) 780-788
• 4 Kearon C, Akl EA, Ornelas J. et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest 2016; 149 (02) 315-352
• 5 Ortel TL, Neumann I, Ageno W. et al. American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Blood Adv 2020; 4 (19) 4693-4738
• 6 Silverstein RL, Bauer KA, Cushman M, Esmon CT, Ershler WB, Tracy RP. Venous thrombosis in the elderly: more questions than answers. Blood 2007; 110 (09) 3097-3101
• 7 Candeias Faria D, Bicho Augusto J, Borges Santos M. et al. Eligibility criteria for non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants in patients with pulmonary embolism in a real world portuguese population. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2016; 5: 138-139 , Abstract P298
• 8 Levi M, Hovingh GK, Cannegieter SC, Vermeulen M, Büller HR, Rosendaal FR. Bleeding in patients receiving vitamin K antagonists who would have been excluded from trials on which the indication for anticoagulation was based. Blood 2008; 111 (09) 4471-4476
• 9 Moustafa F, Pesavento R, di Micco P. et al; RIETE Investigators. Real-life use of anticoagulants in venous thromboembolism with a focus on patients with exclusion criteria for direct oral anticoagulants. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2018; 103 (04) 684-691
• 10 Méan M, Righini M, Jaeger K. et al. The Swiss cohort of elderly patients with venous thromboembolism (SWITCO65+): rationale and methodology. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2013; 36 (04) 475-483
• 11 Fiessinger JN, Huisman MV, Davidson BL. et al; THRIVE Treatment Study Investigators. Ximelagatran vs low-molecular-weight heparin and warfarin for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis: a randomized trial. JAMA 2005; 293 (06) 681-689
• 12 Pinede L, Ninet J, Duhaut P. et al; Investigators of the “Durée Optimale du Traitement AntiVitamines K” (DOTAVK) Study. Comparison of 3 and 6 months of oral anticoagulant therapy after a first episode of proximal deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism and comparison of 6 and 12 weeks of therapy after isolated calf deep vein thrombosis. Circulation 2001; 103 (20) 2453-2460
• 13 Schulman S, Wåhlander K, Lundström T, Clason SB, Eriksson H. THRIVE III Investigators. Secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism with the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran. N Engl J Med 2003; 349 (18) 1713-1721
• 14 Sudlow MF, Campbell IA, Angel JH. et al; Research Committee of the British Thoracic Society. Optimum duration of anticoagulation for deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Lancet 1992; 340 (8824): 873-876
• 15 Kearon C, Ginsberg JS, Anderson DR. et al; SOFAST Investigators. Comparison of 1 month with 3 months of anticoagulation for a first episode of venous thromboembolism associated with a transient risk factor. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 2 (05) 743-749
• 16 Levine MN, Hirsh J, Gent M. et al. Optimal duration of oral anticoagulant therapy: a randomized trial comparing four weeks with three months of warfarin in patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 1995; 74 (02) 606-611
• 17 Büller HR, Davidson BL, Decousus H. et al; Matisse Investigators. Subcutaneous fondaparinux versus intravenous unfractionated heparin in the initial treatment of pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2003; 349 (18) 1695-1702
• 18 Deitcher SR, Kessler CM, Merli G, Rigas JR, Lyons RM, Fareed J. ONCENOX Investigators. Secondary prevention of venous thromboembolic events in patients with active cancer: enoxaparin alone versus initial enoxaparin followed by warfarin for a 180-day period. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2006; 12 (04) 389-396
• 19 Faivre R, Neuhart Y, Kieffer Y. et al. A new treatment of deep venous thrombosis: low molecular weight heparin fractions. Randomized study [in French]. Presse Med 1988; 17 (05) 197-200
• 20 Hull RD, Pineo GF, Brant RF. et al; LITE Trial Investigators. Long-term low-molecular-weight heparin versus usual care in proximal-vein thrombosis patients with cancer. Am J Med 2006; 119 (12) 1062-1072
• 21 Hull RD, Pineo GF, Brant RF. et al; LITE Trial Investigators. Self-managed long-term low-molecular-weight heparin therapy: the balance of benefits and harms. Am J Med 2007; 120 (01) 72-82
• 22 Kearon C, Ginsberg JS, Julian JA. et al; Fixed-Dose Heparin (FIDO) Investigators. Comparison of fixed-dose weight-adjusted unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin for acute treatment of venous thromboembolism. JAMA 2006; 296 (08) 935-942
• 23 Lee AYY, Kamphuisen PW, Meyer G. et al; CATCH Investigators. Tinzaparin vs warfarin for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in patients with active cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015; 314 (07) 677-686
• 24 Lee AYY, Levine MN, Baker RI. et al; Randomized Comparison of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin versus Oral Anticoagulant Therapy for the Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer (CLOT) Investigators. Low-molecular-weight heparin versus a coumarin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. N Engl J Med 2003; 349 (02) 146-153
• 25 Lopaciuk S, Bielska-Falda H, Noszczyk W. et al. Low molecular weight heparin versus acenocoumarol in the secondary prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 1999; 81 (01) 26-31
• 26 Lopaciuk S, Meissner AJ, Filipecki S. et al. Subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin versus subcutaneous unfractionated heparin in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis: a Polish multicenter trial. Thromb Haemost 1992; 68 (01) 14-18
• 27 López-Beret P, Orgaz A, Fontcuberta J. et al. Low molecular weight heparin versus oral anticoagulants in the long-term treatment of deep venous thrombosis. J Vasc Surg 2001; 33 (01) 77-90
• 28 Meyer G, Brenot F, Pacouret G. et al. Subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin fragmin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin in the treatment of acute non massive pulmonary embolism: an open randomized pilot study. Thromb Haemost 1995; 74 (06) 1432-1435
• 29 Meyer G, Marjanovic Z, Valcke J. et al. Comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin and warfarin for the secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: a randomized controlled study. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162 (15) 1729-1735
• 30 Prandoni P, Carnovali M, Marchiori A. Galilei Investigators. Subcutaneous adjusted-dose unfractionated heparin vs fixed-dose low-molecular-weight heparin in the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164 (10) 1077-1083
• 31 Romera A, Cairols MA, Vila-Coll R. et al. A randomised open-label trial comparing long-term sub-cutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin compared with oral-anticoagulant therapy in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009; 37 (03) 349-356
• 32 Simonneau G, Sors H, Charbonnier B. et al. A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin with unfractionated heparin for acute pulmonary embolism. The THESEE Study Group. Tinzaparine ou Heparine Standard: Evaluations dans l'Embolie Pulmonaire. N Engl J Med 1997; 337 (10) 663-669
• 33 Théry C, Simonneau G, Meyer G. et al. Randomized trial of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin CY 216 (Fraxiparine) compared with intravenous unfractionated heparin in the curative treatment of submassive pulmonary embolism. A dose-ranging study. Circulation 1992; 85 (04) 1380-1389
• 34 Büller HR, Prins MH, Lensin AW. et al; EINSTEIN–PE Investigators. Oral rivaroxaban for the treatment of symptomatic pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2012; 366 (14) 1287-1297
• 35 Agnelli G, Prandoni P, Becattini C. et al; Warfarin Optimal Duration Italian Trial Investigators. Extended oral anticoagulant therapy after a first episode of pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139 (01) 19-25
• 36 Schulman S, Granqvist S, Holmström M. et al; The Duration of Anticoagulation Trial Study Group. The duration of oral anticoagulant therapy after a second episode of venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 1997; 336 (06) 393-398
• 37 Agnelli G, Prandoni P, Santamaria MG. et al; Warfarin Optimal Duration Italian Trial Investigators. Three months versus one year of oral anticoagulant therapy for idiopathic deep venous thrombosis. N Engl J Med 2001; 345 (03) 165-169
• 38 Campbell IA, Bentley DP, Prescott RJ, Routledge PA, Shetty HGM, Williamson IJ. Anticoagulation for three versus six months in patients with deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, or both: randomised trial. BMJ 2007; 334 (7595): 674
• 39 Kearon C, Gent M, Hirsh J. et al. A comparison of three months of anticoagulation with extended anticoagulation for a first episode of idiopathic venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 1999; 340 (12) 901-907
• 40 Kearon C, Ginsberg JS, Kovacs MJ. et al; Extended Low-Intensity Anticoagulation for Thrombo-Embolism Investigators. Comparison of low-intensity warfarin therapy with conventional-intensity warfarin therapy for long-term prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2003; 349 (07) 631-639
• 41 Ridker PM, Goldhaber SZ, Danielson E. et al; PREVENT Investigators. Long-term, low-intensity warfarin therapy for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2003; 348 (15) 1425-1434
• 42 Schulman S, Rhedin A-S, Lindmarker P. et al; Duration of Anticoagulation Trial Study Group. A comparison of six weeks with six months of oral anticoagulant therapy after a first episode of venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 1995; 332 (25) 1661-1665
• 43 Agnelli G, Buller HR, Cohen A. et al; AMPLIFY Investigators. Oral apixaban for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2013; 369 (09) 799-808
• 44 Agnelli G, Buller HR, Cohen A. et al; AMPLIFY-EXT Investigators. Apixaban for extended treatment of venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2013; 368 (08) 699-708
• 45 Büller HR, Décousus H, Grosso MA. et al; Hokusai-VTE Investigators. Edoxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2013; 369 (15) 1406-1415
• 46 Schulman S, Kearon C, Kakkar AK. et al; RE-COVER Study Group. Dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2009; 361 (24) 2342-2352
• 47 Schulman S, Kearon C, Kakkar AK. et al; RE-MEDY Trial Investigators, ; RE-SONATE Trial Investigators. Extended use of dabigatran, warfarin, or placebo in venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2013; 368 (08) 709-718
• 48 Bauersachs R, Berkowitz SD, Brenner B. et al; EINSTEIN Investigators. Oral rivaroxaban for symptomatic venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2010; 363 (26) 2499-2510
• 49 Schulman S, Kearon C. Subcommittee on Control of Anticoagulation of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients. J Thromb Haemost 2005; 3 (04) 692-694
• 50 Frei AN, Stalder O, Limacher A. et al. Comparison of bleeding risk scores in elderly patients receiving extended anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists for venous thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost 2021; 121 (11) 1512-1522
• 51 Büller HR, Gent M, Gallus AS, Ginsberg J, Prins MH, Baildon R. Columbus Investigators. Low-molecular-weight heparin in the treatment of patients with venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 1997; 337 (10) 657-662
• 52 Jakobsson C, Jiménez D, Gómez V, Zamarro C, Méan M, Aujesky D. Validation of a clinical algorithm to identify low-risk patients with pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8 (06) 1242-1247
• 53 Fine JP, Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc 1999; 94 (446) 496-509
• 54 Beers E, Moerkerken DC, Leufkens HGM, Egberts TCG, Jansen PA. Participation of older people in preauthorization trials of recently approved medicines. J Am Geriatr Soc 2014; 62 (10) 1883-1890
• 55 Crome P, Cherubini A, Oristrell J. The PREDICT (increasing the participation of the elderly in clinical trials) study: the charter and beyond. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2014; 7 (04) 457-468
• 56 European Medicines Agency. Adequacy of guidance on the elderly regarding medicinal products for human use. Valid from 2006–12–14. Accessed October 7, 2021 at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/research-development/medicines-older-people
• 57 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry. E7 studies in support of special populations: geriatrics - questions and answers. 2012 Accessed October 7, 2021 at: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/e7-studies-support-special-populations-geriatrics-questions-and-answers
• 58 Rothwell PM. External validity of randomised controlled trials: “to whom do the results of this trial apply?”. Lancet 2005; 365 (9453): 82-93
• 59 Geldhof V, Vandenbriele C, Verhamme P, Vanassche T. Venous thromboembolism in the elderly: efficacy and safety of non-VKA oral anticoagulants. Thromb J 2014; 12: 21