Preparation, Premedication, and Surveillance

The main criteria for assessing conscious sedation (perhaps now more correctly termed ”moderate sedation/analgesia”) continue to be patient satisfaction and comfort, short duration, amnesia, and above all, patient safety. The problems reviewed last year - including the increasing pressure on endoscopy units to perform yet more procedures, reduce costs, and achieve shorter patient turn-around times - certainly have not gone away. Studies reviewed this year suggest that although many endoscopic procedures, such as oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD), colonoscopy, and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) can indeed be performed without intravenous sedation, many patients still prefer to be sedated.
Further papers on the possible role of ultrathin endoscopes in unsedated OGD are reviewed here. A study in Italy comparing virtual computed-tomographic (CT) colonography and conventional colonoscopy suggests that unsedated colonoscopy is unlikely to meet with wide acceptance. Audits of colonoscopy in both the United States and the United Kingdom suggest that there is still a long way to go before caecal intubation rates of more than 90 % are regularly attained. The evidence suggests that some endoscopists are using larger doses of a midazolam and pethidine combination than are generally recommended (particularly in elderly patients), and sedation-related deaths are still occurring. Impressively large clinical studies, particularly those from Switzerland, on the use of propofol administered by nonanaesthetists are leading to reconsideration of the earlier view that propofol should only be used by anaesthetists. If propofol is to be used more widely and become an agent administered by endoscopists (or nursing staff), then considerable improvements in the standard of airways management will be needed. Several new studies relating to bowel-cleansing agents and the use of a carbohydrate/electrolyte ”cholera mixture” to prevent the associated intravascular volume contraction have been published. Warm water is a cheap and effective way of reducing colonic spasm during colonoscopy, and intraluminal peppermint oil is a good antispasmodic in the stomach as well as the colon. Sedation should still be regarded as one part of an overall ”endoscopy package”.
Finally, more attention needs to be given to patients’ complaints regarding what are often considered by endoscopists to be ”trivial complications” if the patients are to have a positive experience of their examination that will lead to them being prepared to come back a second time.

References

• 1 Lazzaroni M, Bianchi-Porro G. Preparation, premedication and surveillance.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 103-111
• 2 Bell G D. Premedication and surveillance.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 2-12
• 3 Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D. et al . Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale - update based on new evidence.  Gastroenterology. 2003;  124 544-560
• 4 Faigel D O, Baron T H, Goldstein J L. et al . Guidelines for the use of deep sedation and anesthesia for GI endoscopy. Standards Practice Committee, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 613-617
• 5 Heuss L T, Schnieper P, Drewe J. et al . Risk stratification and safe administration of propofol by registered nurses supervised by the gastroenterologist: a prospective observational study of more than 2000 cases.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 664-671
• 6 Kulling D, Rothenbuhler R, Inauen W. Safety of nonanesthetist sedation with propofol for outpatient colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 679-682
• 7 Bright E, Roseveare C, Dalgleish D. et al . Patient-controlled sedation for colonoscopy: a randomized trial comparing patient-controlled administration of propofol and alfentanil with physician-administered midazolam and pethidine.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 683-687
• 8 Smale S, Bjarnason I, Forgacs I. et al . Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy performed by nurses: scope for the future?.  Gut. 2003;  52 1090-1094
• 9 Varadarajulu S, Petruff C, Ramsey W H. Patient preference for gender of endoscopists.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 170-173
• 10 Aoyagi K, Maeda K, Morita I. et al . Endoscopic removal of a spoon from the stomach with a double-snare and balloon.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 990-991
• 11 Cotton P B, Connor P, McGee D. et al . Colonoscopy: practice variation among 69 hospital-based endoscopists.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 352-357
• 12 Bowles C JA, Leicester R, Romaya C. et al . A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the United Kingdom today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow.  Gut. 2003;  [in press]
• 13 Quine M A, Bell G D, McCloy R F. et al . Prospective audit of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in two regions of England: safety, staffing and sedation methods.  Gut. 1995;  36 462-467
• 14 Dumortier J, Napoleon B, Hedelius F. et al . Unsedated transnasal EGD in daily practice: results of 1100 consecutive patients.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 198-204
• 15 Catanzaro A, Faulx A, Isenberg G A. et al . Prospective evaluation of 4 mm diameter endoscopes for esophagoscopy in sedated and unsedated patients.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 300-304
• 16 Wildi S M, Wallace M B, Glenn T F. et al . Accuracy of esophagoscopy performed by a non-physician endoscopist with a 4 mm diameter battery-powered endoscope.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 305-310
• 17 Saeian K, Staffs D M, Vasilopoulos S. et al . Unsedated transnasal endoscopy accurately detects Barrett’s metaplasia and dysplasia.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 472-478
• 18 Preis C, Charton J P, Schumacher B, Neuhaus N. A randomized trial of unsedated transnasal small-caliber EGD versus conventional EGD.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 641-646
• 19 Birkner B, Fritz N, Schatke W, Hasford J. A prospective randomized comparison of unsedated ultrathin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: does it work better through the nose?.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 647-651
• 20 Botoman V A. Ultrathin crossroads: is smaller better? [editorial].  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 377-380
• 21 Sorbi D, Chak A. Unsedated EGD.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  58 102-110
• 22 Laghi A, Iannaccone R, Carbone I. et al . Detection of colorectal lesions with virtual computed tomographic colonography.  Am J Surg. 2002;  183 124-131
• 23 Jonnalagadda S. Virtual colonography: a step forward?.  Gastroenterology. 2003;  125 258-259
• 24 Pineau B C, Vining D J. Better tolerance for colonoscopy or intolerance to virtual colonoscopy?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 609
• 25 Shah S G, Pearson H J, Moss S. et al . Magnetic endoscope imaging: a new technique for localizing colonic lesions.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 900-904
• 26 Wehrmann K, Frühmorgen P. Evaluation of a new three-dimensional magnetic imaging system for use during colonoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 905-908
• 27 Shah S G, Thomas-Gibson S, Lockett M. et al . Effect of real-time magnetic endoscope imaging on the teaching and acquisition of colonoscopy skills: results from a single trainee.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 421-425
• 28 Shah S, Brooker J C, Williams C B. et al . The variable stiffness colonoscope: assessment of efficacy by magnetic endoscope imaging.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 195-201
• 29 Bini E J, Firoozi B, Choung R J. et al . Systematic evaluation of complications related to endoscopy in a training setting: a prospective 30-day outcome study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 8-16
• 30 Harewood G C. From major to minor: are all endoscopic complications created equal? [editorial].  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 141-144
• 31 Abraham N, Barkun A, LaRoche M. et al . Predicting which patient can undergo upper endoscopy comfortably without conscious sedation.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 180-189
• 32 Bonta P I, Kok M F, Bergman J JGHM. et al . Conscious sedation for EUS of the esophagus and stomach: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial comparing midazolam with placebo.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 842-847
• 33 Keizman D, Brill S, Umansky M. et al . Diagnostic yield of routine push enteroscopy with a graded stiffness enteroscope without overtube.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 877-882
• 34 Lee D WH, Chan A CW, Sze T S. et al . Patient-controlled sedation versus intravenous sedation for colonoscopy in elderly patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 629-632
• 35 Kaassis M, Boyer J, Dumas R. et al . Plastic or metal stents for malignant stricture of the common bile dust? Results of a randomized prospective study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 178-182
• 36 Rudner R, Jalowiecki P, Kawecki P. et al . Conscious analgesia/sedation with remifentanil and propofol versus total intravenous anesthesia with fentanyl, midazolam, and propofol for outpatient endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 657-663
• 37 Jaca I J, Desai D, Barkin J S. Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia after administration of glucagon during upper endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 304-n
• 38 Hiki N, Kurosaka H, Tatsutomi Y. et al . Peppermint oil reduces gastric spasm during upper endoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy controlled trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 475-482
• 39 Church J M. Warm water irrigation for dealing with spasm during colonoscopy: simple, inexpensive, and effective.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 672-674
• 40 Christensen M, Hendel H W, Rasmussen V. et al . Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography causes reduced myocardial blood flow.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 797-800
• 41 Rudolph S J, Landsverk B K, Freeman M L. Endotracheal intubation for airways protection for severe upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 58-61
• 42 Osborn I P, Cohen J, Soper R J, Roth L A. Laryngeal mask airway: a novel method of airways protection during ERCP: comparison with endotracheal intubation.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 122-127
• 43 Harewood G C, Sharma V K, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  58 76-79
• 44 Urita Y, Hike K, Torii N. et al . Hydrogen breath test as an indicator of the quality of colonic preparation for colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 174-177
• 45 Ayus J C, Levine R, Arieff A I. Fatal dysnatremia caused by elective colonoscopy.  BMJ. 2003;  362 382-384
• 46 Barclay R L, Depew W T, Vanner S J. Carbohydrate-electrolyte rehydration protects against intravascular volume contraction during colonic cleansing with orally administered sodium phosphate.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 633-638
• 47 Bretthauer M, Hoff G S, Thiis-Evensen E. et al . Air and carbon dioxide volumes insufflated during colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  58 203-206
• 48 Hilzenrat N, Fich A, Odes H S. et al . Does insertion of a rectal tube after colonoscopy reduce patient discomfort and improve satisfaction?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 54-57
• 49 Sumanac K, Zeally I, Fox B M. et al . Minimizing postcolonoscopy abdominal pain by using CO₂ insufflation: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial evaluating a new commercially available CO₂ delivery system.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 190-194
• 50 Raymer G S, Hartman D E, Rowe W A. et al . An open-label trial of l-glucose as a colon-cleansing agent before colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  58 30-35