Intramolecular Diels-Alder Strategy in a Synthetic Approach to the ­Eleutherobin Core

Hélène Bruyère; Simona Samaritani; Stéphanie Ballereau; Alain Tomas; Jacques Royer

doi:10.1055/s-2005-869830

Subscribe to RSS

Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.

https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00000083.xml

Share / Bookmark

Facebook X Linkedin Weibo

Download PDF

Synlett 2005(9): 1421-1424
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-869830

LETTER

Intramolecular Diels-Alder Strategy in a Synthetic Approach to the Eleutherobin Core

Hélène Bruyère^a, Simona Samaritani^a,, Stéphanie Ballereau^a, Alain Tomas^b, Jacques Royer*^a
^a Synthèse et structure de molécules d’intérêt pharmacologique, UMR 8638, (CNRS-Université René Descartes), Faculté de pharmacie, 4 avenue de l’Observatoire, 75270 Paris cedex 06, France
^b Laboratoire de cristallographie et RMN biologiques, UMR 8015, (CNRS-Université René Descartes), Faculté de pharmacie, 4 avenue de l’Observatoire, 75270 Paris cedex 06, France
Fax: +33(1)43291403; e-Mail: jacques.royer@univ-paris5.fr;

Further Information

Publication History

Received 24 March 2005
Publication Date:
04 May 2005 (online)

Abstract
Full Text
References

Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

An attractive intermediate in the total synthesis of eleutherobin has been synthesised. The key step of this synthesis is an intramolecular Diels-Alder reaction, which leads to intermediate possessing rings A and C of the eleutherobin skeleton.

Key words

eleutherobin - intramolecular Diels-Alder reaction - antitumor agents - eleuthesides - sulfolene

References

2 Fenical W, Jensen PR, and Lindel T. inventors; U.S. Patent 5473057. ; Chem. Abstr. 1996, 102, 194297z
3a D’Ambrosio M. Guerriero A. Pietra F. Helv. Chim. Acta 1987, 70: 2019

Crossref Search in Google Scholar
3b D’Ambrosio M. Guerriero A. Pietra F. Helv. Chim. Acta 1988, 71: 964

Crossref Search in Google Scholar
4 Lindel T. Jensen PR. Fenical W. Long BH. Casazza AM. Carboni JM. Fairchild CR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119: 8744

Crossref Search in Google Scholar
5a Nicolaou KC. van Delft F. Ohshima T. Vourloumis D. Xu JY. Hosokawa S. Pfefferkorn J. Kim S. Li T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36: 2520

Crossref Search in Google Scholar
5b Nicolaou KC. Ohshima T. Hosokawa S. van Delft F. Vourloumis D. Xu JY. Pfefferkorn J. Kim S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120: 8674

Crossref Search in Google Scholar
5c Chen XT. Bhattacharya SK. Zhou BS. Gutteridge CE. Pettus TRR. Danishefsky SJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121: 6563

Crossref Search in Google Scholar
6 Nicolaou KC. Xu JY. Kim S. Pfefferkorn J. Ohshima T. Vourloumis D. Hosokawa S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120: 8661

Crossref Search in Google Scholar
7a Nicolaou KC. Winssinger N. Vourloumis D. Ohshima T. Kim S. Pfefferkorn J. Xu JY. Li T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120: 10814

Crossref Search in Google Scholar
7b Telser J. Beumer R. Bell AA. Ceccarelli SM. Monti D. Gennari C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42: 9187

Crossref Search in Google Scholar
7c Beumer R. Bayon P. Bugada P. Ducki S. Mongelli N. Sirtori FR. Telser J. Gennari C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44: 681

Crossref Search in Google Scholar
7d Chandrasekhar S. Jagadeshwar V. Narsihmulu C. Sarangapani M. Krishna DR. Vidyasagar J. Vijay D. Sastry GN. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14: 3687

Crossref Search in Google Scholar
7e Castoldi D. Caggiano L. Panigada L. Sharon O. Costa AM. Gennari C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44: 588

Crossref Search in Google Scholar
7f Castoldi D. Caggiano L. Bayon P. Costa AM. Cappella P. Sharon O. Gennari C. Tetrahedron 2005, 61: 2123

Crossref Search in Google Scholar
8a Carter R. Hodgetts K. McKenna J. Magnus P. Wren S. Tetrahedron 2000, 56: 4367

Crossref Search in Google Scholar
8b Ceccarelli SM. Piarulli U. Gennari C. Tetrahedron 2001, 57: 8531

Crossref Search in Google Scholar
8c Sandoval C. Redero E. Mateos-Timoneda MA. Bermejo FA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43: 6521

Crossref Search in Google Scholar
8d Scalabrino G. Sun X.-W. Mann J. Baron A. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1: 318

Crossref Search in Google Scholar
8e Friedel M. Golz G. Mayer P. Lindel T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46: 1623

Crossref Search in Google Scholar
9a Kim P. Nantz MH. Kurth MJ. Olmstead MM. Org. Lett. 2000, 2: 1831

Thieme Connect Search in Google Scholar
9b Jung ME. Huang A. Johnson TW. Org. Lett. 2000, 2: 1835

Thieme Connect Search in Google Scholar
9c Winkler JD. Quinn KJ. MacKinnon CH. Hiscock SD. McLaughlin EC. Org. Lett. 2003, 5: 1805

Thieme Connect Search in Google Scholar
9d Ritter N. Metz P. Synlett 2003, 2422

Thieme Connect
10 Samaritani S. Bruyère H. Ballereau S. Royer J. C. R. Chim. 2005, 8: in press

Search in Google Scholar
11 Bruyère H. Ballereau S. Selkti M. Royer J. Tetrahedron 2003, 59: 5879

Crossref Search in Google Scholar
15 Agarwal SG. Thappa RK. Dhar KL. Atal CK. Indian J. Chem., Sect. B. 1981, 20: 164

Search in Google Scholar
19 Schlessinger RH. Pettus LH. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63: 9089

Crossref Search in Google Scholar

1

Present address: Dipartimento di Chimica e Chimica Industriale, Università di Pisa, Via Risorgimento 35, 56126 Pisa, Italy.

12

Compound 6: ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 1.88 (s, 3 H), 3.29 (dd, J = 18.8, 5.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.47 (dd, J = 18.8, 7.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.70-3.90 (m, 2 H), 4.00 (dd, J = 6.1 Hz, 1 H), 5.77 (br s, 1 H). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 18.0, 44.7, 56.2, 63.2, 119.0, 135.9, 171.0.

13

Compound 10a: ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 1.66 (s, 3 H), 1.89 (s, 3 H), 2.00-2.10 (m, 5 H), 2.20 (dt, J = 16.1, 2.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.30-3.60 (m, 4 H), 3.60-3.80 (m, 3 H), 4.09 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1 H), 4.50 (s, 1 H), 5.69 (br s, 1 H). ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 18.4, 19.3, 21.1, 25.3, 50.1, 55.9, 66.5, 72.9, 83.4, 86.3, 117.2, 138.5, 167.9, 170.4. HRMS: m/z calcd for C₁₆H₂₃NO₅S + H: 342.1375; found: 342.1381.

14

The crystal structure has been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre; deposition number CCDC 268676.

16

Compound 14: ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 0.93 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 6 H), 1.45 (dt, J = 13.8, 11.4 Hz, 1 H), 1.60-1.70 [m, 7 H containing at 1.64 (s, 3 H) and at 1.70 (s, 3 H)], 1.70-1.8 0(m, 1 H), 2.00-2.20 (m, 6 H), 2.23 (ddd, J = 14.0, 5.7, 3.0 Hz, 1 H), 2.50 (dt, J = 11.4, 5.6 Hz, 1 H), 2.71 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1 H), 3.30-3.50 (m, 4 H), 4.49 (dd, J = 11.5, 2.9 Hz, 1 H), 4.51 (s, 1 H), 5.42 (br s, 1 H). ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 17.9, 20.8, 21.1, 23.7, 25.3, 26.7, 27.6, 34.7, 36.9, 41.9, 50.1, 79.8, 84.1, 104.7, 121.8, 132.2, 168.6, 172.3, 172.6. HRMS: m/z calcd for C₂₂H₃₁NO₄ + Na: 396.2151; found: 396.2169.

17

NOESY experiment for compound 14.

18

Comparable chemical shifts and coupling constants for protons H-8, H-1, H-10 and H-14 were observed.

20

Compound 15: ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 0.92 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 6 H), 1.20-1.30 (m, 1 H), 1.50-1.70 (m, 7 H), 1.70-1.80 (m, 1 H), 1.90-2.10 (m, 1 H), 2.10-2.30 (m, 2 H), 2.54 (dt, J = 11.0, 7.0 Hz, 1 H), 2.76 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1 H), 4.44 (dd, J = 11.9, 2.6 Hz, 1 H), 5.40 (br s, 1 H), 6.16 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 1 H), 7.45 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 1 H). ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 20.8, 20.9, 21.3, 23.5, 26.8, 27.2, 33.7, 37.0, 41.2, 79.3, 87.7, 121.6, 122.0, 136.2, 147.5, 157.0, 171.5.