Thromb Haemost 2003; 90(04): 636-641
DOI: 10.1160/TH03-03-0151
Blood Coagulation, Fibrinolysis and Cellular Haemostasis
Schattauer GmbH

Antibodies directed to protein S in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: prevalence and clinical significance

Maria Laura Bertolaccini
1   Lupus Research Unit, The Rayne Institute, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
,
Giovanni Sanna
1   Lupus Research Unit, The Rayne Institute, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
,
Shvaita Ralhan
1   Lupus Research Unit, The Rayne Institute, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
,
Laura C. Gennari
1   Lupus Research Unit, The Rayne Institute, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
,
Joan T. Merrill
2   Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, St. Lukes-Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, USA
,
Munther A. Khamashta
1   Lupus Research Unit, The Rayne Institute, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
,
Graham R.V. Hughes
1   Lupus Research Unit, The Rayne Institute, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
› Author Affiliations
Financial support: This work was supported by grants from Lupus UK and the St Thomas’ Lupus Trust.
Further Information

Publication History

Received 14 March 2003

Accepted after revision 20 May 2003

Publication Date:
05 December 2017 (online)

Zoom Image

Summary

Antibodies directed against protein S (anti-ProtS) may be involved in the development of thrombosis in patients with the antiphospholipid syndrome. We assessed the prevalence and clinical significance of anti-ProtS and evaluated their immunological characteristics in 184 patients with SLE and 99 healthy donors. All patients were tested for IgG anti-ProtS by an in-house ELISA. Plasma levels and functional activity of protein S were also tested.

Anti-ProtS were found in 57 patients (31%) and 4 healthy controls (4%). Patients with thrombosis had anti-ProtS more frequently than controls (29% vs 4%, OR 9.5 [95% CI 3.07-29.3], p<0.0001). Anti-ProtS were more frequent in patients with venous thrombosis and in those with arterial thrombosis, than in controls (41% vs. 4%, OR 16.5 [95% CI 5-54], p< 0.0001 and 23% vs. 4%, OR 7 [95%CI 2.1-23.5], p=0.0008, respective-ly). Patients with prematurity, preeclampsia and intra-uterine growth restriction had anti-ProtS more frequently than the control group (36%, 47% and 44% vs. 4%; OR 13.6 [95% CI 2.8-66], p=0.003, OR 21 [95% CI 5-86], p<0.0001 and OR 19 [95% CI 4-99], p=0.0014, respectively). Plasma levels of free protein S were not statistically different between patients with and without anti-ProtS and controls (77.9% [20.7-100] vs. 83.7% [52.7-100] vs. 89% [62-101], respectively). Free protein S functional activity was no different between subgroups (105% [48-230] in anti-ProtS positive vs. 123% [95-283] in anti-ProtS negative vs. 136% [60-174] in controls).

Anti-ProtS are frequent in SLE patients with thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity. These antibodies do not interfere with free protein S in plasma since its level and/or functional activity are not impaired.