Summary
Disorders of platelet function are important causes of abnormal bleeding that require
laboratory tests for diagnosis. Currently there are limited guidelines on how to perform
clinical testing for these disorders. The goal of our study was to obtain information
on how disorders of platelet function are currently evaluated in clinical laboratories.
Two patterns-of-practice surveys were distributed to laboratories of the North American
Specialized Coagulation Laboratory Association (NASCOLA). The information collected was analyzed to determine practices and common problems.
Forty-seven NASCOLA laboratories participated and 54% completed both surveys. The majority of the laboratories
that responded performed more than 50 aggregation tests per year, mainly using platelet
rich plasma based methodologies. A minority performed testing for platelet secretion
and dense granule abnormalities. While platelet aggregation results were reviewed
in various ways, laboratories most commonly issued a combined report containing quantitative
values (% aggregation and/or slope) and a qualitative interpretation. Although laboratories
used similar agonists for aggregation testing, the final agonist concentrations varied
widely. Several approaches were also used to obtain reference intervals. Comments
offered by the participants indicated that performing, and interpreting platelet function
tests were challenging for many clinical laboratories. Although common practices have
evolved, there is considerable variability in the diagnostic test procedures used
by clinical laboratories to evaluate disorders of platelet function. These patterns-of-practice
surveys illustrate a need for guidelines and recommendations for clinical laboratories
performing tests of platelet function.
Keywords
Platelet disorders - platelet function testing - platelet secretion