On Using References as Evidence

Summary

Background: One has to start to consider references as a kind of evidence similar to measured data and observations. Moreover, proper referencing adds to the credibility of a paper and gives appropriate credits to work of others. Experience of reviewers and editors indicate that there is room for improvement in the way that our scientific evidence base is referred to.

Objective: To provide guidelines for referencing in medical informatics publications.

Method: The authors have collected examples of poor as well as good referencing as encountered in manuscripts submitted for review as well as in published literature.

Results and Conclusion: A set of 12 rules for proper referencing was derived. The rationale for each rule is provided and examples of rule violations and proper use of the rule are pre sented.

Keywords

Referencing - publication guideline

• References

• 1 McD Taylor D. The appropriate use of references in a scientific research paper. Emerg Med (Fremantle) 2002; 14 (02) 166-170.
• 2 Lukić IK, Lukić A, Glunčić V, Katavić V, Vuĉenik V, Marušić A. Citation and Quotation Accuracy in Three Anatomy Journals. Clin Anatomy 2004; 17: 534-539.
• 3 Hansen ME, McIntire DD. Reference Citations in Radiology: Accuracy and Appropriateness of Use in Two Major Journals. Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163 (03) 719-723.
• 4 Gosling CM, Cameron M, Gibbons PF. Referencing and quotation accuracy in four manual therapy journals. Man Ther 2004; 9 (01) 36-40.
• 5 Martin JR, White PRR. The Language of Evaluation, Appraisal in English. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005
• 6 Steers WD. Out of Cite: Reflections on Selective Referencing. J Urol 2007; 178: 373-374.
• 7 Maisonneuve H. Scientific writing: the choice of references. Santé 1994; 4 (01) 53-56 (in French).