Exploiting Online Discussions to Discover Unrecognized Drug Side Effects

Summary

Background: Drugs can treat human diseases through chemical interactions between the ingredients and intended targets in the human body. However, the ingredients could unexpectedly interact with off-targets, which may cause adverse drug side effects. Notifying patients and physicians of potential drug effects is an important step in improving healthcare quality and delivery.

Objective: With the increasing popularity of Web 2.0 applications, more and more patients start discussing drug side effects in many online sources. These online discussions form a valuable source for mining interesting knowledge about side effects. The main goal of this paper is to investigate the feasibility of exploiting these discussions to discover unrecognized drug side effects.

Methods: We propose methods that can 1) build a knowledge base for drug side effects by automatically integrating the in -formation related to drug side effects from different sources; and 2) monitor online discussions about drugs and discover potential unrecognized drug side effects.

Results: Experiment results show that the online discussions indeed provide useful information discovering unrecognized drug side effects. We find that the integrated knowledge base contains more information than individual online sources. Moreover, both proposed detection methods can identi -fy the side effects related to the four recently recalled drugs, and the information from online discussions makes it possible to make the detection much earlier than official announcements. Finally, the proposed genera -tive modeling method is shown to be more effective than the discriminative method.

Conclusions: We find that it is possible to monitor online discussions to detect un -recognized drug side effects. The developed system is expected to serve as a com -plementary tool for drug companies and FDA to receive feedbacks from the patients, and it has the potentials to expedite the discovery process of unrecognized drug side effects and to improve the quality of healthcare.

Keywords

Algorithms - adverse effects - online discussions

• References

• 1 Bertsche T, Pfaff J, Schiller P, Kaltschmidt J, Pruszydio MG, Stremmel W, Walter-Sack I, Haefeli WE, Encke J. Prevention of adverse drug reactions in intensive care patients by personal intervention based on an electronic clinical decision support systems. Intensive Care Medicine 2010; 36 (04) 665-672.
• 2 Campillos M, Kuhn M, Gavin AC, Jensen LJ, Bork P. Drug Target Identification Using Side-Effect Similarity. Science 2008; 321: 263-266.
• 3 Edwards IR, Aronson JK. Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management. The Lancet 2000; 356 9237 1255-1259.
• 4 Berry DC, Knapp P, Raynor DK. Provision of information about drug side-effects to patients. The Lancet 2002; 359 9309 853-854.
• 5 Curino CA, Jia YY, Lambert B, West PM, Yu C. Mining officially unrecognized side effects of drugs by combining web search and machine learning. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. 2005: 365-372.
• 6 Rocchio JJ. Relevance feedback in information retrieval. In Gerard S. editor The SMART Retrieval System: Experiments in Automatic Document Processing. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1971: 313-323.
• 7 Cover T, Hart PE. Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 1967; 13 (01) 21-27.
• 8 Yang Y, Pierce T, Carbonell JG. A study on retrospective and on-line event detection. In Proceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 1998: 28-36.
• 9 Kuhn M, Campillos M, Letunic I, Jensen LJ, Bork PA. Side effect resource to capture phenotypic effects of drugs. Molecular Systems Biology 2010; 6: 343
• 10 Chee BW, Berlin R, Schatz B. Predicting adverse drug events from personal health messages. In Proceedings of AMIA Annual Symposium. 2011: 217-226.
• 11 Leaman R, Wojtulewicz L, Sullivan R, Skariah A, Yang J, Gonzalez G. Towards internet-age pharmacovigilance: extracting adverse drug reactions from user posts to health-related social networks. In Proceedings of the 2010 Workshop on Biomedical Natural Language Processing. 2010: 117-125.
• 12 Kamel Boulos MN, Sanfilippo AP, Corley CD, Wheeler S. Social Web mining and exploitation for serious applications: Technosocial Predictive Analytics and related technologies for public health, environmental and national security surveillance. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2010; 100 (01) 16-23.
• 13 Chew C, Eysenbach G. Pandemics in the age of Twitter: content analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak. PLoS ONE 2010; 5: 11
• 14 Cook S, Conrad C, Fowlkes AL, Mohebbi MH. Assessing Google flu trends performance in the United States during the 2009 influenza virus A (H1N1) pandemic. PLoS ONE 2011; 6: 8
• 15 Heaivilin N, Gerbert B, Page JE, Gibbs JL. Public health surveillance of dental pain via Twitter. Journal of Dental Research 2011; 90 (09) 1047-1051.
• 16 Paul MJ, Dredze M. You are what you tweet: analyzing twitter for public health. In Proceedings of the 5th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. 2001: 265-272.
• 17 Signorini A, Segre AM, Polgreen PM. The use of Twitter to track levels of disease activity and public concern in the U.S. during the influenza A H1N1 pandemic. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6: 5
• 18 FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Surveillance/AdverseDrugEffects/default.htm.
• 19 FDA’s Sentinel Initiative. http://www.fda.gov/Safety/FDAsSentinelInitiative/default.htm.